gof22 said:
Ururu117 said:
gof22 said:
manaman said:
gof22 said:
Unlike MCcain, Bush, and Cheney he know when to exit a fight. I am shy and a loner so I have no real use for people except when I need something. Who ever said one night stands were involved. I plan to die a virgin. As I said relationships are for other people. They are not for me.
That is fine, I mean if you know what you want in life and are going to go for it then more power to you.
You won't really know what you are missing unless you give people a shot through. You are in forums responding to people, so I would think that at least at some level you crave human interaction.
I would give you some advice, that you should not write off everyone. I mean it is still your choice but it seems you have picked a very lonely and non fulfilling path. I just think you need to really take a long look at the reasons for that. Did you pick the path or did it pick you?
I picked it but it also picked. Most of my friends were never truly my friend and so I chouse to cut my losses and not trust anybody instead of taking a chance.
That is a losing proposition in a game with win conditions. Tit for tat is almost universally recognized as the optimal choice in this scenario.
Basically put, you are doomed to fail because you believe you are doomed to fail. Self fulfilling prophecy. Stop dragging our society down with your sub-optimal tactics.
How exactly am I dragging society down by being a loner? I am not causing society to fail in anyway by not talking to people.
Do you not know what sub-optimality is?
Quick lesson: Imagine a curve. Hell, don't imagine one, let me draw one.
Credits to google.
Now, see the top bit? The highest part? That is the maxima. In most economic, political, psychological, etc curves, a maxima represents an optimal point, that is to say, a point where it is impossible to do better. Every factory outputting at 110 percent, for example.
Loners tend to act sub-optimally to a degree that is unpreventable. It is simply infeasible to do your best when you are alone; almost any non-trivial task can be broken down, parallelepiped, or structured in such a way that two people can do the work faster than one. In fact, the job of most efficiency experts is to break big jobs down into the biggest bits that a single person can do better than two people.
So, by refusing to cooperate, you are acting sub-optimally, as you COULD be more productive, and more efficient, by cooperating, instead of defecting. Tit-for-tat is very powerful in social situations. And by refusing to cooperate, and yet taking advantage of the benefits of society (such as a standing army, the infrastructure we all depend on, etc) you are acting as a social leech, bringing us all down a little bit so that you can not be bothered by social interaction and such.
See now?