Huh. Good for her I suppose, to have the guts to say something like that on national television, but whatever. I don't really feel this warrants this kind of attention.
I don't think he takes full blame for all of this, but he definitely has partial blame in it for getting how big it did. The media is also to blame, as usual. Had they not covered this story, and built up so much about it, then it may have well just blown over.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Why is it an infringement of her right to free speech for him to publicly disagree with what she said during a public competition? I mean, I agree people shouldn't be publicly attacked for what they feel in their own heads or even what they express in private, or even sometimes among friends--I'm a big fan of privacy and lifestyle rights.Mr.Pandah said:I said they should've just given her a bad score and be done with it instead of Perez going home and crying to all of the internet about how he was wronged and the gay community needs to fight this oppressor.Cheeze_Pavilion said:I don't know exactly what happened beside her coming in second--why do you say they didn't just give her a bad score and be done with it?Mr.Pandah said:You just said it yourself anyways, they imposed conformity. Whether or not it was there competition, they should've just given her a bad score and been done with it. She wasn't standing up there trying to get someone else to believe her views.
But um, an answer in the Miss USA pageant isn't exactly 'private' or 'personal'. I wouldn't exactly call a gay dude getting all drama queen in his blog about what happened at a beauty pageant that big a deal.
I mean, at this point, *she* and other conservatives are the ones keeping the issue alive, so um, yeah--I don't think she's got any sort of problem with all this controversy. I think, quite frankly, she's loving every second of it.
Actually, I've been more in the mood for Key Lime Pie. Apple is good though. Actually, oatmeal pie sounds good right about now.Arehexes said:Any time someone famous does one stupid thing we have to make a big deal over it. Lets not just forget them about talk about something important...like pie how about that apple pie huh huh...?
Basically opposes gay marriage but dosn't want a constitutional ban, and supports a type of civil union.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Can we have a source for this so we know the context?sneakypenguin said:Then you would call obama a close minded idiot? She didn't say she was against people being gay, just that she supported "traditional" marriage, nothing wrong with that view.The Rogue Wolf said:She has the right to believe what she likes and state her opinion.
And I have the right to call her a closed-minded bigot in response.
Maybe she placed her values over winning the contest? as far as I'm concerned, I'd say that's very honorable. You may not agree with it, but that is the beauty of free speech. No one can stop her. You have just as much of a right to support gay marriage as they do to be against it.GodsOneMistake said:She has the right to say what she wants but she's still an idiot. You don't insult the people that are voting for you if you want to win something.
So essentially, you view yourself as a vigilante for these boards, poking, proding, ever so slighty, for someone to slip up, and say something wrong. Then when that happens, you are on the full offensive.Cheeze_Pavilion said:What do you mean she never said anything that could be wrong? She said "that?s how I think it should be between a man and a woman." How is it not possible to be wrong about what you think should "be"?Mr.Pandah said:How did you even pull that one out of there? Misinterpretations abound on this messageboard in from this beauty pageant apparently. He can go cry about it, but in reality, she never said anything wrong. That is the point I'm making about it.
Um, then why did you make a posting where you put her next to a wooden cross and handed everyone three nails and a hammer?Mr.Pandah said:I don't think he takes full blame for all of this, but he definitely has partial blame in it for getting how big it did. The media is also to blame, as usual. Had they not covered this story, and built up so much about it, then it may have well just blown over.
Of course shes loving all of this coverage though, but I don't think that was her intention in the first place. And yeah, the conservatives are going to use this as well, to fuel their anti-gay views. They're going to say, look at how much of an outrage that gay community causes for a simple expression of freedom of speech.
Besides, there is making your opinion publicly known, but then theres just being a whiny little baby about it.
I stick to my thought that she shouldn't be crucified over some petty little statement about her beliefs.
I hate sloppy logic and muddled thinking, and that's exactly what this issue seems to bring out in people.Besides Cheese, I don't know why you always fight to the death over everything.![]()
Hey--tell us all you're a gay-bashing fundamentalist homophobe: that's fine with me.
However, don't make any reference to objective facts you cannot demonstrate. Do not use any line of logic that is not valid and without error. Do not equivocate in the use of your terms or concepts. These are principles, which every man of every faith can embrace. These are not polite suggestions, these are codes of behavior and those of you that ignore them will pay the dearest cost. There are varying degrees of evil. We urge you lesser forms of filth not to push the bounds and cross over into true corruption, into our domain. But if you do you, one day you will look behind you and you will see we three, and on that day, you will reap it. And we will send you to whatever mod you wish.
Wah...Wuh...Whhattt?? How is that not along the same lines as her? He spoke like a politician in order to keep himself safe, but his intentions were the same. He flat out said, he believes marriage is "between a man and a woman". You even quoted Miss California herself saying that exact same thing!Cheeze_Pavilion said:Yeah, not "along the same lines as Ms Cali" at all.sneakypenguin said:Basically opposes gay marriage but dosn't want a constitutional ban, and supports a type of civil union.Cheeze_Pavilion said:Can we have a source for this so we know the context?sneakypenguin said:Then you would call obama a close minded idiot? She didn't say she was against people being gay, just that she supported "traditional" marriage, nothing wrong with that view.The Rogue Wolf said:She has the right to believe what she likes and state her opinion.
And I have the right to call her a closed-minded bigot in response.
"ABC News' Teddy Davis, Sunlen Miller, Tahman Bradley, and Rigel Anderson report: Barack Obama's nuanced position on same-sex marriage is on full display in an MTV interview which is set to air on Monday.
Obama told MTV he believes marriage is "between a man and a woman" and that he is "not in favor of gay marriage."
At the same time, Obama reiterated his opposition to Proposition 8, the California ballot measure which would eliminate a right to same-sex marriage that the state's Supreme Court recently recognized."
Typical politician view but along the same lines as Ms Cali.
Mary and Joseph were married, but they did not consummate the marriage yet, which is why when she was a pregnant virgin, with that Jesus character you are referring to, the angels came and so on and so forth. They never actually had sex.Cheeze_Pavilion said:I don't know anything about that, but I'm pretty sure they were married before there was Christianity, seeing as how they were the parents of that, you know, Christ guy.
Also, I hear they were part of this group called the Jews, who were also around before Christ, and they had some vague concept of pairbonding that one might call marriage.
"The Miss America Pageant" is run by gay people?GodsOneMistake said:She has the right to say what she wants but she's still an idiot. You don't insult the people that are voting for you if you want to win something.