woem said:
Merteg said:
"Dating violence is where a person in a relationship feel intimated by their partner, whether physically or mentally. Why do these things happen? They are widely because of drugs, video games, and abuse."
I'm glad you posted the complete reference. Here's the thing: those are not the real reason. Take for instance drugs. Drugs don't make you do things. There's usually a reason why people do drugs. If you find those reasons, then you will probably find that those are the real reasons why "dating violence" happens.
That completely disregards pretty much all the knowledge we have on pharmaceuticals. It is KNOWN for several drugs to cause irrationality, or completely upset emotional stability. Ever wonder where the term "roid rage" comes from? Because steroids can cause you to go into irrational and uncontrollable anger!
Now, you could argue that only body builders use roids, and thus the activity (body building) leaves the subjects (body builders) to fall into the syndrome (roid rage). This is essentially equivalent to your argument (people do drugs for a reason, and that underlying reason is the problem, not the drugs). The problem is that roid rage was discovered in CHILDREN who take steroids for disorders. The children with the disorders are essentially randomly distributed, with very weak correlations on race and other genetic predispositions, as were the incidents of roid rage! This essentially debunks your line of reasoning, because randomly distributed children of various backgrounds, with nothing in common with each other, all developed similar symptoms. It was the drug, not the person.
Now, you could argue this does not apply to recreational drugs, which would be equally wrong, as we have a multitude of cases of date rape directly associated with BAC levels. As BAC goes up, the chance for date rape goes up. Most drugs have typical results from usage: amphetamines cause violence and heart attacks to scale, alcohol has rape and abuse scaling with it, etc etc. These are among RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED PERSONS, including those who unwittingly or unwillingly were given drugs (which is relatively common in some areas).
Basically, to blame the users internal state of mind for what is obviously caused by the compound they use is criminally negligent to the years of medical research and billions of dollars spent studying addiction. Not to mention case studies, experiments with drugs, etc etc. It is simply a fundamental attributional error, to blame the internal state when it is so clearly the external influence.