But they've innovated all sorts of things (many of which Sega did first).anthony87 said:Funny.....I was thinking the exact same thing regarding their successes.
But they've innovated all sorts of things (many of which Sega did first).anthony87 said:Funny.....I was thinking the exact same thing regarding their successes.
I still don't know where they go from here. Are the 3 mil or so that bought one enthusiasts? Q2 and 3 will tell us a lot more. My question is, once the few million enthusiasts buy one, will sales, still #3 of the big 3, dry up?The Lunatic said:One often forgets how lightly the Xbone got off upon it's unveiling.
Might I add, the first Xbox bombed in Japan, one of the world's biggest gaming markets, IIRC.CriticKitten said:People like us who are paying attention already do think that. People who don't pay attention are too busy declaring the doom of Nintendo to notice what's happening.chozo_hybrid said:I think this year will tell us who's sitting where this generation, I think the Wii U will make a recovery, heck, it's sold over 2 million more units then the Xbox One, I know the Wii U has been out about a year, but the PS4 is less than a million away from the same number of units sold, shouldn't people be thinking Xbox may be the one in trouble if it doesn't pick up soon?
The lead that the PS4 has built up is substantially larger than its rival, and while it's unconfirmed, it's somewhat implied that the PS4 is also costing Sony less than the Xbone is costing MS. And while people keep saying that the PS4 has released in more countries, they need to realize that MS just might never release in those countries at all, because they wouldn't pick up a hell of a lot of sales in those smaller markets (at least, not enough to justify the expense).
So MS has to do something with the markets it has to close this lead gap, because it can't take a $1 billion hit on top of its existing losses. Like I said in my earlier post, if Titanfall (the game that is pretty much supposed to sell the Xbone) fails, I think that'll be a huge red flag that the Xbox division is on its last legs. They're counting on Titanfall to recoup most of the losses from their initial development and release costs, so if it can't do that, then investors will have even more ground to argue for the Xbox division's sell-off.
I agree with with everything you say but I still think some of that has to be bad P.R when you tell gamers where going to spy on you . Then you turn around and tell people where going to spy on them for adds.Lightknight said:There were several other things. Like the Kinect 2 for example. To the public they said it's not for marketing and you don't have to send anything over while in the same week the Marketing VP stood up in front of investors and marketing representatives from other companies to tell them that the Kinect 2 represents the next era of marketing directly to the relevant consumers. He even stated to reporters that they only get a "few" points of biometric data (think age, number of people in the family, general health statistics, etc. There really isn't a lot of biometric data that you'd need).
Unfortunately what Nintendo needs to do is pay for some of the development for these games like what Sony is doing with Borderlands 2 VITA. I actually want to get a VITA for that because it has all of DLC, except the head hunters packs I believe.Panzer Camper said:I think the wii and wii u seem to be following the exact same line of eventually brushing off all third party games once they get some decent console movers out of their own. Remember the wii also had some decent third party support in the beginning and we all know how that turned out.kilenem said:snip
Street Pass. Its pretty legit It kind of makes people bring their 3DS with them and increase interaction with people. Making gamers less anti social when you have to leave the House to progress in some of the video games linked to it. Although I do feel sorry for the people in the middle of no where because they have difficulty meeting people.EvilRoy said:What in recent memory have Nintendo done differently that has attracted people ire? Cause I'm not really finding anything. There was a bump when the first rumors started about Nintendo embracing mobile gaming, and then a dip when they actually released their highly unimpressive plan, but the first reactions have generally been good to them changing.the hidden eagle said:Well when they try to do something different people ***** and moan so Nintendo can't win either way.EvilRoy said:Wait, so what is it called when Nintendo makes the same decisions over and over to pursue their traditional business practices in the face of decreasing consumer confidence, and steadily dropping stock price.VG_Addict said:Nintendo doomsayers don't seem to realize that doing (or in this case, saying)the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.
I'm sitting here matching news stories to stock prices trying to figure out why Nintendo keeps losing me money and 'doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result' seems to be accountable for most of it. You can claim up and down that this or that 'might' be bad for Nintendo, but what they're doing now IS bad for Nintendo.
Who says they hate Nintendo? Why does stating that Nintendo is failing with the Wii U mean that you hate Nintendo? Since when is this a situation where you are either for or against Nintendo? No, being a grown up means you understand that a person can state that something was done poorly without meaning that you hate it and those associated with it.CriticKitten said:Which I always found funny. If they hate Nintendo so much, why would they want Nintendo to go third party?KingWein22 said:OT: I have had faith in Nintendo all the time, and laugh at people when they go all joy-joy about Nintendo's shortcomings. CriticKitten's posts are on point about MS and Sony's losses and peeps tend to look the other way. Nintendo's reports a loss? Well, they should just give up entirely, go 3rd party and then they can make a profit off their Mario and Zelda and others. They can even get a bigger fanbase!!
The answer, of course, is because a lot of those "haters" really just want to play Nintendo's games (because they're generally some of the highest quality games on the market in their respective genres), but don't want to be associated with the negative stigma of owning a Nintendo console because "they're for babies". Well, tough. Part of being grown up means you stop caring about whether or not something is considered "for children", and you just enjoy what you choose to enjoy.
That is the thing, I'm still trying to figure out the logic of it. What exactly has Nintendo done to earn so much ire? If people are still sulking over the N64/GC/Wii/DS/3DS, heck if they're still sulking over the Wii U then they have some SERIOUS freaking issues they need to work out with a therapist. Nintendo exists and they are an entity that likes to go against the grain and do their own thing.It's about time people get over that.CriticKitten said:But there is a very, very regular occurrence on these forums where people will take the slightest bit of Nintendo news to make stupid statements like "Nintendo is failing" or "Nintendo should die" or "Nintendo should go third party".
That's the thing. That doesn't happen. I see threads like this one decrying the "Nintendo Hate" regularly. I could probably set my watch by them. I never see "Nintendo Hate" threads. The closest to these mythical "Nintendo Hate" threads is the stories reporting on Nintendo. And the comments on those are virtually identical to the comments on Sony or Microsoft threads. Except on those threads you actually get people proclaiming how mighty and superior the PC is. I don't think I've seen that in a Nintendo thread, yet.CriticKitten said:Opinions are fine. I don't agree entirely with what you've said but I respect your right to an opinion.Saltyk said:-opinions-
But there is a very, very regular occurrence on these forums where people will take the slightest bit of Nintendo news to make stupid statements like "Nintendo is failing" or "Nintendo should die" or "Nintendo should go third party".
Those are the people I'm talking about. Not you. So I'm not sure why you attributed my statements to yourself when I'm clearly not talking about you.