Nuclear Armageddon is here... (Wheres The Satellite?)

Recommended Videos

vultureX21

New member
Feb 26, 2009
300
0
0
Roamin11 said:
Appeasement it?s a good thing!!!!
Unless your Czechoslovakia.

But really it won't be appeasement so much as it will be a teacher staring down a misbehaving student for shooting rubber bands in class. The kid will avert his eyes, flick the rubber band on the ground in a final act of weak defiance, and then stop. North Korea doesn't want to rile anyone up enough to provoke a real forceful response because they couldn't survive one. Unless Jong-Il goes "bat-shit crazy" as I said before.

So the chances are about 50/50 with Elvis in charge... I jest... but just a little.
 

Inverse Skies

New member
Feb 3, 2009
3,630
0
0
Meh, how many times was the doomsday clock set at five minutes or whatever during the cold war? I sincerely doubt anything will come of this, because really, why bother? What does Pyongyang stand to gain by firing any sort of ballistic missile? The answer is nothing, making the concept laughable.
 

Dele

New member
Oct 25, 2008
552
0
0
Dastardos said:
That's basically it, except for NK saying they will invade and destroy Japan. I realize, most likely, nothing will happen, but it is still something to be somewhat worried about.
North Korea GDP 2007: $25.96 billion
Japan military spending 2008: $48.86 billion

Yeah I can see invasion happening especially when NK practically has no navy.
In case they launch missiles at Japan, I will find hard to feel sympathy as US, Japan and South Korea have been constantly giving FOOD AID to North Korea and thus preventing the collapse of stalinistic regime from it's own stupidy.
 

Eclectic Dreck

New member
Sep 3, 2008
6,662
0
0
Booze Zombie said:
If it's actually just a satellite, then the Koreans are justified to respond, I do believe.
If not... what's one missile gonna do?
Depending on how well it works and what it's carrying, I guess the answer varies. In actual terms, probably not a lot even if it is accurate AND carrying a nuclear payload given it's estimated range means it probably can't raech any major US population centers, but that never stopped anyone from getting hysterical.
 

Dastardos

New member
Jan 4, 2009
1,760
0
0
Inverse Skies said:
Meh, how many times was the doomsday clock set at five minutes or whatever during the cold war? I sincerely doubt anything will come of this, because really, why bother? What does Pyongyang stand to gain by firing any sort of ballistic missile? The answer is nothing, making the concept laughable.
Yes but at the same time North Korea has nothing to lose.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Actually if we fought North Korea like a real war and simply decimated the place instead of trying to walk in and police it, we could make some progress, and send a message to the rest of the world.

At any rate, all we can do is wait and see how things play out.
 

Hunde Des Krieg

New member
Sep 30, 2008
2,442
0
0
TheFacelessOne said:
LewsTherin said:
Booze Zombie said:
If it's actually just a satellite, then the Koreans are justified to respond, I do believe.
If not... what's one missile gonna do?
Theres about 20 million people in the greater Los Angeles area, 100 million in Japan, 3 million in the area of Vancouver, 50 million in South Korea, and then of course there's China, but I'm not sure of their relations with North Korea.

One nuke in the right spot and a LOT of people die.
Xactly.

Don't forget the radiation cloud. If a nuke was launched on a windy day, that radiation cloud will spread.

Say a nuke is dropped in LA. The wind is blowing to the East. That cloud spreads across U.S. and kills ALOT more people.
It probably wouldn't go more than one or two states at most, and even then only a limited area of those states. I have read How to Survive a Nuclear holocaust. A very serious book every survivalist should have in their library. It has fairly detailed maps of the likely paths of fallout spread by wind from various potential targets. It doesn't ever really matter to me, I truly live in nowhere.
 
Apr 3, 2009
26
0
0
Simply put; a lot of military theorists and pundits will get their panties in a twist, the American Right will use the incident as justification for their military budget, politicians will ride in on a wave of paranoia and bugger all will actually happen.
 

Dastardos

New member
Jan 4, 2009
1,760
0
0
Therumancer said:
Actually if we fought North Korea like a real war and simply decimated the place instead of trying to walk in and police it, we could make some progress, and send a message to the rest of the world.

At any rate, all we can do is wait and see how things play out.
That would be incredibly stupid.
Do you think no one would care if we did this?
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
Dastardos said:
Therumancer said:
Actually if we fought North Korea like a real war and simply decimated the place instead of trying to walk in and police it, we could make some progress, and send a message to the rest of the world.

At any rate, all we can do is wait and see how things play out.
That would be incredibly stupid.
Do you think no one would care if we did this?

Doubtlessly people would care, and that would be the point.

The fact that we don't do things like this is why nobody takes us seriously. Nobody fears America which is why we are slipping. Push and America backs down. If we respond it's ineffective because of our morality and we get involved in a gueriella war that does as much damage to us as if we had simply chosen to do nothing.

The thing is our nation is currently full of cowardly "peace at any price" liberals with no conception of reality. Russia just invaded Georgia, threatened to nuke Poland over us building a defensive missle site for them there, and rather blatently tried to assasinate a pro-american leader in Ukraine... all with no repercussions. Why was there no repercussions pray tell? Because people are scared of Russia because Russia will strike back hard and people figure it's best not to provoke them.

Our prosperity and lifestyle is directly proportionate to our military dominance and using that dominance to ensure trade and world policy on our terms. As that slips, so does our success, leading to more power and resources going to the competition (like China).

North Korea has basically just threatened to launch a nuke, we warned them off. They are unlikely to listen because they figure we aren't going to do crap about it, and if we do it's going to cause an even bigger mess for us because of how we do business. They aren't scared of the US and don't take us seriously.

If we turn around and decimate North Korea as a result, and then just go "meh" when confronted with the dead civilians and such (unlike our usual response) the rest of the world is going to respond with outrage up until the point we send the clear message that
we really don't give a cr@p anymore. As a result everyone will start taking their relations with us more seriously (as opposed to sneaking behind our back to violate sanctions through things like the "Oil For Food" program), and our prosperity will increase.

The rest of the world isn't going to gang up on the US. We have the firepower to destroy the world twenty times over, at least at the moment. The world can't push because if they do so too hard it's the equivilent of putting a gun up to their head and pulling the trigger. According to the most pessimistic estimates the US has like a mere 20% chance of surviving in anything close to an intact condition if we were to engage the entire world simultaneously with WMD. This includes enviromental fallout. That's not good until you consider that the odds of the rest of the world surviving are 0%.

Under the circumstances we might as well act like it. China rattles their sabers and gets respect and increases in power. Russia invades and assinates and gets respect and increases in power. Well heck, let's stop being wusses and remind people why America is in charge and that we're trying to be nice when it comes to things like "The War On Terror" we don't HAVE to use kid gloves. If North Korea pushes they are an ideal target for a reminder.

I understand many others are going to disagree, after all I am a militant, and that is not as common an attitude as it should be. But honestly I feel the US is getting kicked around like a Hackey Sack and I'm tired of it. I mean honestly, how many times do we have to turn the other cheek, or engage in ineffective police actions to try and make some kind of obtuse moral point that only matters to liberal armchair acaademics.

>>>----Therumancer--->
 

cuddly_tomato

New member
Nov 12, 2008
3,404
0
0
Therumancer said:
If we turn around and decimate North Korea as a result, and then just go "meh" when confronted with the dead civilians and such (unlike our usual response) the rest of the world is going to respond with outrage up until the point we send the clear message that
we really don't give a cr@p anymore. As a result everyone will start taking their relations with us more seriously (as opposed to sneaking behind our back to violate sanctions through things like the "Oil For Food" program), and our prosperity will increase.
No. The rest of the world would boycott US goods and refuse to aid the USA in military endeavours. I know this might come as a shock to you but the rest of the world is rather important, and the USA can't just ignore it.

Therumancer said:
The rest of the world isn't going to gang up on the US. We have the firepower to destroy the world twenty times over, at least at the moment. The world can't push because if they do so too hard it's the equivilent of putting a gun up to their head and pulling the trigger. According to the most pessimistic estimates the US has like a mere 20% chance of surviving in anything close to an intact condition if we were to engage the entire world simultaneously with WMD. This includes enviromental fallout. That's not good until you consider that the odds of the rest of the world surviving are 0%.
The USA can't beat Iraq, and even trying too has overstretched its forces. Ohh sure, they beat that statue of Saddam and made a little "Green Zone" so your political leaders could have a few photo ops and claim victory, but going outside that means violence and possibly death, pretty likely severe wounding. Afghanistan is falling apart, the Taliban are still out there fighting. Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar are still at large. Sorry, but Rambo is not based upon a true story of what American GIs are really like.
 

Grimm91

New member
Jan 8, 2009
1,040
0
0
I would really love to see North Korea get fucked. But at this time it would only cause larger international incidents.
 

Darth_Dude

New member
Jul 11, 2008
1,302
0
0
DannyBoy451 said:
As far as I know Noth Korea's military consists of two-dozen rice farmers with 60-year-old rifles, pointy sticks, and an old Soviet tank with no reverse gear.

I'm not exactly bricking myself.
Actually North Korea is the most militarised country in the world today, having the fourth largest standing army in the world, at an estimated 1.1 million armed personnel

P.S Yes i did copy that of wikipedia

P.P.S What you said was probably sarcasm....
 

keyper159

New member
Dec 13, 2008
407
0
0
If they launch that rocket on April 8th, it will officially be my worst birthday ever.
 

McClaud

New member
Nov 2, 2007
923
0
0
[Insert Evil Laugh Here said:
]Simply put; a lot of military theorists and pundits will get their panties in a twist, the American Right will use the incident as justification for their military budget, politicians will ride in on a wave of paranoia and bugger all will actually happen.
Nah, they tried that during the Clinton years and Congress was like, "Man, we are NOT going back there so shut it." And that was the end of that. No extra military funding for South Korea or anything. In fact, during Bush's administration, the number of US forces in South Korea and their hardware decreased exponentially so they could redeploy all that to Iraq for the surge. I doubt they'll get any more money or troops over there. They have the US Navy and the Air Force out of Japan that could very easily level Pyongyang with a bunch of ALCMs and ship cruise missiles. No one would even have to set foot in the DMZ.

Dastardos said:
Inverse Skies said:
Meh, how many times was the doomsday clock set at five minutes or whatever during the cold war? I sincerely doubt anything will come of this, because really, why bother? What does Pyongyang stand to gain by firing any sort of ballistic missile? The answer is nothing, making the concept laughable.
Yes but at the same time North Korea has nothing to lose.
North Korea has EVERYTHING to lose. As someone mentioned, the only reason they aren't completely devestated yet is because we keep sending them food aid and China's too busy making money. If the dynamic changes in the slightest, they may become the Korean Peoples' Republic of China or worse - starve their million man army and remaining population to death.
 

LordCraigus

New member
May 21, 2008
454
0
0
It's just a test of long-range missile capabilties, they're not about to launch a test missile at anyone. I believe they're simply 'flexing their guns' as someone previously said.

A few people have mentioned that the US should just bomb North Korea to dust, to me the fact that there's people like that who are literally 'thinking with nukes' is scarier than the NK missile test itself.
 

Dastardos

New member
Jan 4, 2009
1,760
0
0
LordCraigus said:
It's just a test of long-range missile capabilties, they're not about to launch a test missile at anyone. I believe they're simply 'flexing their guns' as someone previously said.

A few people have mentioned that the US should just bomb North Korea to dust, to me the fact that there's people like that who are literally 'thinking with nukes' is scarier than the NK missile test itself.
They aren't testing a long-range missile. They are preparing to launch a rocket to space carrying a satellite to set into orbit.