Obama is a Fascist and a Communist?

Recommended Videos

smudgey

New member
May 8, 2008
347
0
0
Dormin111 said:
One could argue that it is fascist to order corporations around through federal directives.
But if said corporations go bankrupt and ask for $700 billion of taxpayer money to bail them out, or if they create the biggest environmental disaster of a nation's history, directly affecting the lives of thousands, if not millions of a nation's people, then you'd expect the government to step in, wouldn't you?
 

Lem0nade Inlay

New member
Apr 3, 2010
1,166
0
0
Although you could say that the Right Wing and Left Wing politics is not like a straight line, each going off into the distance. Because eventually Communists will become Fascists and vice versa, so I like to think of Right and Left wings making up a circle, each starting the same way, then as they drift further apart and become more obscure they turn into each other.
 

ShadowKatt

New member
Mar 19, 2009
1,410
0
0
I don't believe he's a facist or a communist, but I do believe that he's a socialist and he's not doing this country any good in the least.
 

BlumiereBleck

New member
Dec 11, 2008
5,402
0
0
Yes he is a fascist, a communist supporter and socialist. Therefore he is the enemy of the State, because in my country our government is a Constitutional Capitalistic Republic.
 

smudgey

New member
May 8, 2008
347
0
0
AgentBJ09 said:
Karl Marx argued that an economic minority, the rich, can dominate the working class. So far, that's not true. In fact, the rich pay the most for their wealth. So ten percent may own the most money in America, but those same people provide %70 of the total tax revenues. The Middle class, the %60 in the middle, pay the remainder of the taxes. The impoverished, the lowest %30, pay nothing, and they also receive the majority of government aid that is funded by taxpayer money.

So, given that, why would Obama want more money from the rich and the middle class for the poor when there's no reason to do so? The answer is because those people who have nothing often believe that some one should provide for them, whether they deserve it or not.
Have you ever thought that those who have nothing might actually be hard working people who are getting screwed over by the companies they work for? Take hero pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger for example. The guy who landed a plane on the Hudson. He spoke in front of congress about how his pay had been cut 40% and his pension, like other airline pensions, was terminated and replaced by a PBGC guarantee worth only pennies on the dollar.
Shouldn't someone as highly skilled as an airline pilot be getting a good pay?
And what about all the people working in your supermarkets, waiting your table at the restaurant and collecting your garbage? They all do jobs that are demanded by today's society. Someone HAS to do those jobs. Yet the people that do, get paid next to nothing for it.
And it's not like everyone can go be a doctor, lawyer or junior executive. There are only so many college/university places available, only so many scholarships and then only so many open positions. During the GFC, for example, there were thousands of people lining up for jobs to flip burgers, many of them overqualified.
AgentBJ09 said:
The problem is if you punish those who have to provide for those who do not have, you get a class of people who refuse to work and live off the government and the working class. Then, when people see that their work is being punished, what reason would they have to keep their businesses large and profitable? They would choose to shrink their businesses to escape the taxes and in the process, Capitalism dies. That leads into Communism.
Absolute rubbish. You really think people WANT to live on handouts and the minimum wage? Between 1933 to 1985, the highest tax rate in the USA did not drop below 50%. It even went to well over 80%. But did that stop people from wanting to be wealthy? Wanting to be successful? Of course not!
AgentBJ09 said:
Is that good? Hell no. Capitalism is part of our culture, as well as nearly every other successful nation out there. It's the reason sites like The Escapist even exist
....So internet sites aren't created in Socialist or Communists countries then?
 

Pegghead

New member
Aug 4, 2009
4,017
0
0
Well they're two contrasting ideologies, fascism is all about the people licking the boots of the one true boss and communism is all about giving the people equality and certain levels of control (But imo both haven't worked very well in the past when done by the book so I support neither, good old democracy for me).

I think it has something to do with his plan for free health care, mind you I think the image of Obama being some kind of pseudo-communist leader is birthed from the good ol' boys who stew together terms such as "Communist", "Homosexual", "Atheist" and various other kinds of creeds and beliefs into one big ol' collective insult for those who step a toe out of line when it comes to following what they've been brought up to believe. So when the hip, change-bearing, fresh idea laden Obama won against an elderly, caucasian, conservative, straight-faced war veteran you can see that there's potential for a knee jerk reaction.
 

smudgey

New member
May 8, 2008
347
0
0
Dormin111 said:
smudgey said:
Dormin111 said:
One could argue that it is fascist to order corporations around through federal directives.
But if said corporations go bankrupt and ask for $700 billion of taxpayer money to bail them out, or if they create the biggest environmental disaster of a nation's history, directly affecting the lives of thousands, if not millions of a nation's people, then you'd expect the government to step in, wouldn't you?
I never said that. I merely suggested that Obama's increased interference in the business world could be called fascist just like FDR back in the day.
It could be called fascist. It could also be called necessary. He's only doing it because he has to. The dude's got one of, if not the most demanding job in the world. I doubt he wants to seriously add to his workload. If he interferes with businesses, he gets called a fascist. If he doesn't, people complain that he isn't doing enough. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
You may call it "interference", but the way companies are run these days i wouldn't trust a CEO with a lemonade stand.
 

mattttherman3

New member
Dec 16, 2008
3,105
0
0
I gotta say, if Obama had total power he'd probably be good for a time, then power would corrupt, but unfortunately he has to deal with congress and senators that are all paid by some lobbyest to get taxbreaks for their companies.
 

AgentBJ09

New member
May 24, 2010
818
0
0
smudgey said:
AgentBJ09 said:
Karl Marx argued that an economic minority, the rich, can dominate the working class. So far, that's not true. In fact, the rich pay the most for their wealth. So ten percent may own the most money in America, but those same people provide %70 of the total tax revenues. The Middle class, the %60 in the middle, pay the remainder of the taxes. The impoverished, the lowest %30, pay nothing, and they also receive the majority of government aid that is funded by taxpayer money.

So, given that, why would Obama want more money from the rich and the middle class for the poor when there's no reason to do so? The answer is because those people who have nothing often believe that some one should provide for them, whether they deserve it or not.
Have you ever thought that those who have nothing might actually be hard working people who are getting screwed over by the companies they work for? Take hero pilot Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger for example. The guy who landed a plane on the Hudson. He spoke in front of congress about how his pay had been cut 40% and his pension, like other airline pensions, was terminated and replaced by a PBGC guarantee worth only pennies on the dollar.
Shouldn't someone as highly skilled as an airline pilot be getting a good pay?
And what about all the people working in your supermarkets, waiting your table at the restaurant and collecting your garbage? They all do jobs that are demanded by today's society. Someone HAS to do those jobs. Yet the people that do, get paid next to nothing for it.
And it's not like everyone can go be a doctor, lawyer or junior executive. There are only so many college/university places available, only so many scholarships and then only so many open positions. During the GFC, for example, there were thousands of people lining up for jobs to flip burgers, many of them overqualified.

AgentBJ09 said:
The problem is if you punish those who have to provide for those who do not have, you get a class of people who refuse to work and live off the government and the working class. Then, when people see that their work is being punished, what reason would they have to keep their businesses large and profitable? They would choose to shrink their businesses to escape the taxes and in the process, Capitalism dies. That leads into Communism.
Absolute rubbish. You really think people WANT to live on handouts and the minimum wage? Between 1933 to 1985, the highest tax rate in the USA did not drop below 50%. It even went to well over 80%. But did that stop people from wanting to be wealthy? Wanting to be successful? Of course not!

AgentBJ09 said:
Is that good? Hell no. Capitalism is part of our culture, as well as nearly every other successful nation out there. It's the reason sites like The Escapist even exist
....So internet sites aren't created in Socialist or Communists countries then?
Ok. Let's go down the line here.

1. I have two jobs right now, one in a grocery store, and I'm about to graduate with a Bachelors in Business Management. I don't expect to be compensated more for my college experience, but I am paid more because I've done cashiering for five years, four of which at the same company.

Also, pilots, right now, are paid around $30,000 for their first year. Is that low? Not really. As a Flight Officer, or first year pilot, they're not flying the plane, but helping keep it on course and safe. The Captain flys the plane, and they get a larger salary.

2. Trust me, I've seen it. Not all of the impoverished do it, but a good number of them do in some fashion. In fact, I've seen several regulars at my grocery store who buy 100 dollars or more on food stamps every time they come in, and families who split up and buy the exact same things with coupons for each item. It's not just living off welfare or government aid that's the issue, it's those people taking advantage the system.

Actually, I just noticed a misquote I made here. I meant to say small businesses die as a result of higher taxes and greater regulations, not Capitalism. Still, since small businesses create the majority of the Capitalist work force in America, it's the same both ways.

3. You missed the point. In which Communist or Socialist nations are websites like this one created and maintained? Do any of these nations create websites where people can communicate like us on the Escapist? Now, in fairness, China has some websites that make people money. The problem is that they usually do so though selling knock-offs that are harmful, or by fraud, unless you're willing to give the gold farmers a pass.

I can draw on experience from this because I bought two DS games I thought were good from an eBay seller, only to find out later that they were pirated and the seller was actually based in China instead of Australia.

Still, Obama cannot be classified one way. From what he, and his people, have done, he can be called a Maoist, a Communist, and a Socialist.

Nice points, though.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Dormin111 said:
Kinguendo said:
Dormin111 said:
One could argue that it is fascist to order corporations around through federal directives.
No one couldnt, one would find (upon doing ones research) that corporations LOVE fascism.

EDIT: And, in fact, America was nearly turned into a fascist state by a bunch of corporation heads including George W. Bush's grandfather.
Whether or not they enjoyed it is irrelevent. it is typical of fascist governments to order corporations around. For instance, Hutler ordered German car companies to make tanks and planes.
I think you will find that every country did that... seriously, just a little research.
 

Kinguendo

New member
Apr 10, 2009
4,267
0
0
Skullkid4187 said:
Yes he is a fascist, a communist supporter and socialist. Therefore he is the enemy of the State, because in my country our government is a Constitutional Capitalistic Republic.
I cant tell if you are being serious or you think you are being funny...
 

Lyri

New member
Dec 8, 2008
2,660
0
0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUPMjC9mq5Y&feature=channel

are these your friends op?
 

Osirisgod16

New member
Feb 23, 2010
52
0
0
If you want ignorance come on down to Utah! Everyone here is very very conservative Republicans, I've been fired for being a democrat. But here it's not surprising to walk down the street and here Obama's latest scheme for world domination.

Edit: And Fox News and Glen Beck, opinions are the basis of their stories, it's kinda like a recipe: 75% opinion 25% truth, and everyone believes them! And recall that Fox News is the site that first brought up Rapelay, Issues in Mass Effect, and saying Wikipedia is the website for pedophiles.
 

kingcom

New member
Jan 14, 2009
867
0
0
Razada said:
Random ignorants. Probably the same people who didn't vote for him cause hes black.

Plus its hard to define either, as Stalin's Russia is closer to a fascist regime then a communist society. True communism would be the antitheses of fascism, but we have not seen true communism in about 33,000 years of human history.

Obama is a good guy who is being over-rated, causing a backlash like this. But hell, thats society for you.

Just phase them by pointing out that technically America is not a democracy, it is a Republic. From there expand to basic trolling.

This is all I can say.
No Stalin was a Socialist totalitarian. Hitler for example was a Facist totalitatirian.
Communism and Facism are economic ideologies. Totalitarianism and Liberalism are Social ideologies.

Also America is BOTH a Republic AND Democracy. A republic is any form of government without a monarchy.