Overated Movies

Recommended Videos

VincentMm

New member
Feb 13, 2009
107
0
0
To be honest, everything since about 1992 has seemed over-rated because it's all just shoved in my face constantly, whether it's media frenzy or people just going on and on about whichever film it is.

There are so many really good films that I've had to FORCE myself to watch because I'm so sick of hearing about them.

Ignoring that, I'd have to say Cloverfield.
I can understand why people like most films but seriously, I really thought that film was utter rubbish.
 

maninahat

New member
Nov 8, 2007
4,397
0
0
||XIII said:
maninahat said:
I'm going with 2001: A Space Odyssey. An absurdly drawn out and pretentious work in which scenes mercilessly drag on and on and on, way after making their point.
Full Metal Jacket, and Platoon, perhaps.. But Apocalypse now? Really? I've spend hours re-watching and marveling at that piece.
Exactly Hours...I once watched a five hour long version of that film. Actually, apart from that Apocalypse is probably the least overrated of the three (in other words, it is the most deserving of praise).
 

Grey_Focks

New member
Jan 12, 2010
1,969
0
0
I think you all are confusing "overrated movies" with "movies that most people like that I do not."

Just because YOU don't like a movie doesn't mean it's "overrated", and this goes with anything. The whole idea behind these "overrated" threads is just dumb. If you want to make a thread where you list things that are popular that YOU don't like, then make a thread with an appropriate title, just don't call them "overrated."

EDIT- Okay...you people think because you saw a movie and didn't like, but a lot of other people like it, than that classifies it as overrated? No, you're wrong, it just means you have a dissenting opinion. An opinion you are all of course entitled to, but that isn't the same thing as a movie being overrated. Calling anything overrated just makes you sound pretentious.
 

chozo_hybrid

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets.
Jul 15, 2009
3,479
14
43
I'm going to come out and say it, while I thought it was okay, I would have to say Pulp Fiction is over rated.
 

Slaanax

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,532
0
0
FargoDog said:
Slaanax said:
FargoDog said:
I have more than a few. Aliens, Avatar, Eraserhead, Pulp Fiction, The Mist, Hurt Locker, Inglorious Basterds, Goodfellas, A Clockwork Orange, The Human Centipede (more hype than anything), Salo, Gone with the Wind and there's a few more that I can't think off.

EDIT: Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz too.
Sounds more like a list to anger the people in this forum than movies you don't like.

For me its 300 its unbelievably over hyped and the dialogue was annoying after a while.
It wasn't a list of movies I disliked, it was a list of movies I found over rated. I enjoyed almost all of the movies that I stated, I just thought they were over rated. And I doubt people on this site are petty enough to be wound up by my movie tastes.
Seems like a lot of people actually agree with you more than I thought, still Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz are two of my new Favorite movies, then again I love comedy movies that make fun of other genres.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
Nautical Honors Society said:
Miumaru said:
Any movie people go "You never saw ____!?"
Mostly just because that is annoying. Godfather, ET and Aliens are the main ones.
We can judge movies we haven't seen simply on the fact that our friends annoy us? Sweet!

In that case I hate mystic river, citizen cane, and gangs of new york!

OT: Where the Wild Things Are was one of the worst movies I have ever seen, so boring.
Mostly it is because apparently I HAVE to see them if I want to have been alive. I mean, if I was an avid gangster movie fan, but never saw The Godfather movies and someone was surprised, that would be more understandable. Those movies just do not appeal to me, so it should not be a big deal I did not see them.
 

Tehlanna TPX

New member
Mar 23, 2010
284
0
0
sabbat said:
Anyone remember how apeshit people went for Doom? Any of you actually sank so low as to watch that piece of crap? GAMES DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO MOVIES WELL. Except for Silent Hill and Resident Evil. They are awesome.
going with what the other poster said about it all being a matter of taste. I honestly enjoyed Doom. I even own the DVD.

I enjoy high brow, international, subtitled fair. And cheesefest pure shit (helloooooooo Street Fighter?)

OP: Twilight. Ugh.
 

SlowShootinPete

New member
Apr 21, 2010
404
0
0
Nazulu said:
WALL-E and Toy Story are some others.
WALL-E isn't just overrated, it's bad. Not awful, but not good either.

The first act was great. But then once they got to the Axiom and introduced human characters, everything went downhill.

John is an awful character. When he tries to get Wall-E to take the empty cup from him, why does he completely flip out? "Here, take the cup. Take the cup. TAKE THE CU-" *falls* Seriously? The robot doesn't respond immediately, so you practically jump out of your seat over a minor inconvenience? We're supposed to like this asshole?

Then we meet that fat lady, I forget what her name was. She and John meet each other later in the movie and become friends. I felt that her awe at seeing the rest of the ship once her holographic screen thing gets shut off was a bit lame, but that's just a minor niggle. What really bothered me was the "We have a pool?!" joke. It's a very weak joke, and it has already been established that she's discovering things she never noticed before. It's a pointless moment.

When Wall-E and Eve are being taken to the bridge, they pass through this lobby with a one-eyed secretary robot hanging from the ceiling. This is actually my favorite character, because out of all the others it receives some of the most meaningful development. Wall-E waves to it before riding up the elevator, and the robot tentatively waves back, and then looks at its arm-thing curiously and repeats the gesture. Later, when it shows up again, it waves vigorously at Wall-E as he passes by. I didn't even notice what that meant at first. This is a non-speaking character you only see twice, but its actions give it a surprising amount of personality and are a very simple example of how Wall-E's appearance on the ship has influenced people.

The sad thing about the secretary robot is that it is more compelling than the villain, Otto. Otto has no personality at all. Its motivations are simplistic, and it has no distinguishing features aside from copying the appearance of Hal-9000. Why is it that, while over the course of 700 years of solitude a little trash-collection robot has developed a distinct personality, the ship AI who has interacted with hundreds of human beings for an equal amount of time is the same mindless drone that it was when it was made? Why are all the other robots in the movie apparently programmed to demonstrate complex, individual behaviors, while the one specifically designed to be intelligent is so dull?

The captain is almost as bad. He makes a big deal about almost missing a daily announcement, apparently one of the highlights of his day, but then when he actually gives it he looks and sounds so bemused. He makes a cheap fat joke ("We have a gym?"). After searching through the ship's database and finding various facts about Earth, he's completely enthralled. But later when he and Otto are discussing whether the Axiom should go back to Earth, he sounds like he's arguing that humans have a duty to take care of their home, when it would make much more sense for him to say something like "We've been cooped up on this ship doing nothing for 700 years, and now we have this chance to do something new and glorious." This is a man who has never known real responsibility in his entire life, because everything is automated.

Why the hell do they need a plant sample to be able to return to Earth? Doesn't the ship have navigation computers? Couldn't they just look up Earth's coordinates?

Why does Buy and Large give an order that the Axiom should never return to Earth? It's almost understandable that they would give up the salvage attempt, but why completely burn that bridge when there was a possibility that the Earth could have healed enough to sustain human life again on its own? Why continue sending down probes if it didn't matter anyway? It isn't as if any of the passengers would know.

Why does the presence of plant life show that Earth is habitable again? Couldn't the plants have adapted to survive a toxic atmosphere? Why not just have the Eve probes analyze the atmosphere directly, reading the chemical makeup of the air to determine if it's breathable?

Why, in 700 years, is this the first time Wall-E has ever seen one of these probes? Judging by his reaction to that rocket the first time it lands, and his reaction upon seeing Eve, this is completely new to him. Did the Axiom just then start sending probes down? Do they pick random spots to search in? Why do they fly back to the Axiom after searching for such a short period? Couldn't they just stay there and travel back only when the atmosphere improved enough for the humans do go back home?

Why does Eve have a cannon in her arm? What possible use could that serve? (On a slightly related note, why does Wall-E have a cassette player built into his body?) She appears to be the most technologically advanced robot on the entire ship, able to fly, inflict massive destruction with her arm-cannon, and somehow articulate her limbs and head without them needing to physically connect to her body. Why waste something like that to look for weeds when they could be put to such better use as ship security? Eve completely outclasses the guard robots that the Axiom does use.

Is the Axiom the only ship that actually returns to Earth? Early in the movie, a Buy and Large commercial on a billboard says that there's an entire fleet of ships. What happened to all of them?

This writing is terrible, and nothing makes sense.

But the thing that really ruined the movie for me is from when Wall-E is trying to bring the plant sample to that plant-analyzer thing, and Otto tilts the ship. Everything starts sliding "down" in the direction that the ship tilts (gravity does not work like that in space, damnit), including a big goup of small children. John and that fat woman from earlier show up again and they rescue the children from being crushed under a large bench or something, and just before they do the woman makes the most terrible pun I have ever heard in my entire life:

"John, get ready to have som kids."

WHAT SICK PERSON WROTE THIS

Wall-E is so overrated it isn't funny. I think it's probably the worst Pixar film I've ever seen.
 

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
Dodgeball. My friends loved it, I hated it. The only time I laughed when first watching was "Fucking Chuck Norris" right at the end.

Oh and the re-make of the Italian Job. Horrible, horrible.
 
Sep 17, 2009
2,851
0
0
Miumaru said:
Nautical Honors Society said:
Miumaru said:
Any movie people go "You never saw ____!?"
Mostly just because that is annoying. Godfather, ET and Aliens are the main ones.
We can judge movies we haven't seen simply on the fact that our friends annoy us? Sweet!

In that case I hate mystic river, citizen cane, and gangs of new york!

OT: Where the Wild Things Are was one of the worst movies I have ever seen, so boring.
Mostly it is because apparently I HAVE to see them if I want to have been alive. I mean, if I was an avid gangster movie fan, but never saw The Godfather movies and someone was surprised, that would be more understandable. Those movies just do not appeal to me, so it should not be a big deal I did not see them.
Hey it makes no difference to me some people don't care to see certain movies it is no big deal.

I just meant don't call movies overrated unless you have watched them to formulate an opinion besides the fact that people pester you about not having seen it.

BTW I have never seen Aliens, ET was ok (i may have been to young to see it), but I do happen to love the Godfather.
 

Miumaru

New member
May 5, 2010
1,765
0
0
Nautical Honors Society said:
Miumaru said:
Nautical Honors Society said:
Miumaru said:
Any movie people go "You never saw ____!?"
Mostly just because that is annoying. Godfather, ET and Aliens are the main ones.
We can judge movies we haven't seen simply on the fact that our friends annoy us? Sweet!

In that case I hate mystic river, citizen cane, and gangs of new york!

OT: Where the Wild Things Are was one of the worst movies I have ever seen, so boring.
Mostly it is because apparently I HAVE to see them if I want to have been alive. I mean, if I was an avid gangster movie fan, but never saw The Godfather movies and someone was surprised, that would be more understandable. Those movies just do not appeal to me, so it should not be a big deal I did not see them.
Hey it makes no difference to me some people don't care to see certain movies it is no big deal.

I just meant don't call movies overrated unless you have watched them to formulate an opinion besides the fact that people pester you about not having seen it.

BTW I have never seen Aliens, ET was ok (i may have been to young to see it), but I do happen to love the Godfather.
By their surprised response, they are suggesting such movies EVERY one should have to see by default. That sounds like overrating a movie to me. Maybe they are great movies, but I have not seen them and been doing fine so far.
 

Jezzascmezza

New member
Aug 18, 2009
2,500
0
0
The Dark Freaking Knight.
Heath Ledger's performance was great, the rest was meh.
and i can't stand Christian Bale's acting.
 

Cody211282

New member
Apr 25, 2009
2,892
0
0
||XIII said:
Saving Private Ryan, really.. The camera work is good and all, but it doesn't get close to portraying war realistically. There's not really any character development outside of Upham, and the plot is rather trivial. It doesn't hold up to movies such as Full Metal Jacket, Apocalypse NOW or Platoon.
I liked it but I do have to say the reason for going and finding the guy was retarded as hell, because the lives of 10 or so highly trained rangers are worth the life of one other guy, even if he is airborne.
 

Slaanax

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,532
0
0
DSK- said:
Dodgeball. My friends loved it, I hated it. The only time I laughed when first watching was "Fucking Chuck Norris" right at the end.

Oh and the re-make of the Italian Job. Horrible, horrible.
My favorite part of Dodgeball the chest full of money says Deus Ex Machina.
 

CK76

New member
Sep 25, 2009
1,620
0
0
Nylis said:
I don't really get this whole "overrated" thing. Everyone has different opinions on what they think makes a good movie.

A lot of the time whenever I see people claiming that a movie is overrated, it just seems to me that the movie didn't suit their own personal tastes. Then they get all bent out of shape when other people actually enjoyed it and they can't understand why.
To me it is the laziest of criticisms. Something has qualities which one likes or does not, others views are irrelevant.
 

SturmDolch

This Title is Ironic
May 17, 2009
2,346
0
0
Must... Accept... People think Tarantino is overrated *cry*.

I'll have to go with anything Steven Soderbergh touches, except maybe the Ocean's Eleven films and maybe Good Night, Good Luck (I haven't seen it).

To list a few:

- The Informant! - An astoundingly horrible movie that critics love, including MovieBob. It was an exercise in boredom, with painfully anti-funny jokes made by an awkward Matt Damon. Seriously, the most exciting part about the film is the exclamation mark in the title. Not to mention it's extremely confusing. It's the first and only movie I have ever walked out of. Although that was close to the end, so unless it was all building up to some Ultra-Joke, I believe I have every right to say it was terrible.

- Michael Clayton - Another excruciatingly boring film. And just as confusing as The Informant! I can't believe Clooney acted in this, but he gravitates towards Soderbergh, as he did in:

- Syriana - Same reasons as before. Watched this one at home. Did not understand what was going on, which wasn't helped by trying to keep myself awake.

Now for some other films...

- Avatar - It was ok. Nothing spectacular. Yay flashy lights! The people that say this is the best thing ever are the film equivalent of gamers that say game A is better because it has better graphics.

- Splice - Another case of the critics loving something that sucks. Go on IMDB, most of the users are saying how it should be seen as a comedy, which was most definitely not intended.


Other than that, I have such diverse taste in film that I like quite a lot. I can't think of any others right now. I love that most of my favourite ones have been mentioned!

And if you want underrated, anything by Robert Rodriguez EDIT: that isn't a kid movie.
 

TheJwalkR

New member
May 20, 2009
148
0
0
I would have to go with full metal jacket. The second half set in Vietnam just doesn't work for me.

And, come on guys how could The Godfather be overrated? You cannot overrate the best movie ever made. I admit three wasn't fantastic but one and two, especially one are works of art.
 

LiquidGrape

New member
Sep 10, 2008
1,336
0
0
Aliens (James Cameron, 1986)

Reduced the untouchable freudian horror into a gung-ho laden bug hunt.

Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino, 1994)

Vacuous pandering which somehow struck a nerve with people who mistook inconsequential pop-culture references for wit.

The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan, 2008)

The cinematic equivalent of a spoiled psychology minor with a video camera.