Police taser 10 year old.

Recommended Videos

0p3rati0n

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,885
0
0
When a girl get tazed by the police you know when its time to call super nanny.......

OT- assault towards a police officer. So yeah they had the right to do it. But it was still unnecessary. Plus how can then not restrain her? Are they trying to go easy???!!!
 

Zildjin81

New member
Feb 7, 2009
1,135
0
0
Ummm she did physically assault the officer... even if she's only 10.
The officer probably wasn't thinking very clearly and regrets what he did. That's the kind of thing that can get you unemployed for life.
 

PuppetMaster

New member
Aug 28, 2009
247
0
0
robman1130 said:
PuppetMaster said:
robman1130 said:
HG131 said:
ravens_nest said:
They should have called the RSPCA instead...

That's the Animal Cops to non-Britons...

Using a tazer is probably overkill in this situation. But what were they gonna do? Shoot her with a tranq gun? Gassed her? Smack with a club? The kid was acting like an animal, I think the police were justified to defend themselves especially since she attacked them. But her mum is clearly a ***** who can't raise a decent child...
Exactly. They had every right to tase her.
would yall have liked it better if the cop shot her?
I'm sure if instead of merely assaulting an officer, she assaulted him with a knife or bat then yes, Feuer frei
merely assaulted? she kicked his nuts
I consider assault with a deadly weapon a bit more serious, but regardless, we're on the same side
 

Zac_Dai

New member
Oct 21, 2008
1,092
0
0
For all of Britain's faults, stories like these make me glad I don't live in the USA.
 

PuppetMaster

New member
Aug 28, 2009
247
0
0
0p3rati0n said:
When a girl get tazed by the police you know when its time to call super nanny.......

OT- assault towards a police officer. So yeah they had the right to do it. But it was still unnecessary. Plus how can then not restrain her? Are they trying to go easy???!!!
I'm sure if they tried conventional methods intended for 180-200lb "usual suspects" the girl could risk serious injury. tazing was appropriate and acceptable given the circumstances
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
no not at all

her mom gave the green light and kid or not you cant kick the police in the balls
 

PuppetMaster

New member
Aug 28, 2009
247
0
0
HG131 said:
PuppetMaster said:
Maikan Bacon said:
RAND00M said:
coxafloppin said:
Id taser any ***** that kicked me in the nuts.
But a ten year old?...Dude that's cold.
I second the tazering of crotch kicking bitches.
I call to order the 1st gathering of the "That ***** kicked me in the nuts! Taze her!" club
Hello. Do we get free Tasers?
it's similar to the NRA, we don't hand out tazers, but we encourage liberal use of them
 

Noone From Nowhere

New member
Feb 20, 2009
568
0
0
Power corrupts and when one weilds the power of Zeus in handy-dandy pocket-sized scale, expect mere mortals and their whelps to be smitten at the raise of an eyebrow.

I personally know a few takedown manuvers that work on grown men and these law-enforcement professionals couldn't use one on an unarmed little girl?

The whole groin kick thing isn't an excuse. If I can take it without any trouble, why can't some tough guy cops do so? Does anyone in real life have such a low pain tolerance? It's almost enough to make me call shenanigans on the whole news story.

That said...why can't players tazer children in police-themed videogames?! Nick Kang is enough of a jerk where it would completely be in character for him!
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
Kollega said:
On one hand, a ten-year old girl. On the other, she actually assaulted the officer. It's not completely justified and/or reasonable, and it's kinda strange that policemen couldn't just grab her, but... well. I can see why.

[HEADING=3]And hey, all people who say we should just beat our children! You know who, among others, was beaten as a child? ADOLF HITLER, that's who. No points for guessing the consequences.[/HEADING]
your statement is so damn arrogant i just lost brain cells

1 beating is not the same as giving them a smack
2 many kids have been beaten, how many have killed millions of people? 1? now how many have been beaten? problay over a couple billion
3 your basically using the "columbine shootings were caused by doom" arguement in fact thats exactly what you are doing just about different thing
 

FolkLikePanda

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,710
0
0
HG131 said:
FolkLikePanda said:
Something I would have done. "Get in the shower now or I'll taser ya!". Whatever happened to kids obeying out of fear of their parents give them a smack or something.
They figured out smacks don't hurt much.
Fair enough
 
Sep 4, 2009
354
0
0
I support the actions of the police in what was situation. Its not like they pulled a billy club on her.

"Ten years old and they shot electricity through her body, and I want to know how the heck in God's green earth can they get away with this.

"If you can't pick the kid up and take her to your car, handcuff her, then I don't think you need to be an officer. She doesn't deserve to be treated like a dog. She's not a tiger."


He makes her sound like an inanimate object.
Inanimate objects don't kick officers in the groin.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Technically, hitting a police officer means the officer of cleared to use a taser...I'm pretty sure the way it works is that an officer is allowed to use a level of force 1 higher then the Assailant, the levels being threats and unruly behavior<unarmed strikes<Nonlethal weapons and Melee weapons<firearms. So Unarmed strikes clear the officer for useing things like a taser (Please, correct me if I'm wrong, I remember this fuzzily, and am curious if I'm remembering accurately.) So strictly speaking, the officer has something to point to in order to prevent him from getting into major problem. Then again, I'm straining my brain to figure out a situation where a 10 year old girl could pose a considerable threat to a Cop. I would imagine that just physically restraining her would be well within his capacity, and hope that this reflects negatively on his career. I am actually going to show a little sympathy here for the mother. Calling a cop in because her daughter won't take a shower seems pretty ridiculous on the surface, but I imagine that the problem goes a lot deeper then just a shower: A shower likely just brought the situation to a head. I think this because if she was willing to kick a Cop, obviously the girl is in serious need of help, well beyond councilling and into the realm of some serious medication. This isn't a matter of a misbehaved child, this is a matter of something being radically wrong with her brain. I guess that a mentally ill child, a parent at there wits end, and a cop who loses his composure when he gets kicked in the nuts is less entertaining then a neglectful parent, evil child, or brutal cop, but I suspect it's closer to the truth.

Off topic, what's the term for the standard that cops use for the zone within (I believe) 14 feet around a cop where a person with a melee weapon would be able to strike the cop before they can fire their gun? The something Standard, I think? I know this is completely unrelated, but I'm hoping that those people pulled to this thread have some cop knowledge, and I recently needed to use the term, and I absolutely can't find it. It's bothering me greatly.
 

UltraParanoia

New member
Oct 11, 2009
697
0
0
TexaNigerian said:
Power corrupts and when one weilds the power of Zeus in handy-dandy pocket-sized scale, expect mere mortals and their whelps to be smitten at the raise of an eyebrow.
No.

TexaNigerian said:
I personally know a few takedown manuvers that work on grown men and these law-enforcement professionals counld use one on an unarmed little girl?
Good for you. And no, the cops generally aren't allowed to use "magicalninjermoves" on people because the precincts don't like excessive force lawsuits every time someone uses them.

TexaNigerian said:
That said...why can't players tazer children in police-themed videogames?! Nick Kang is enough of a jerk where it would completely be in character for him!
For the same reason we aren't allowed to kill the children in video games. Some asshole will get their panties in a bunch and scream about "child murder simulators".

I vote for tazering game developers who include children, make them really annoying, and then don't let you do anything to them.
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
FolkLikePanda said:
HG131 said:
FolkLikePanda said:
Something I would have done. "Get in the shower now or I'll taser ya!". Whatever happened to kids obeying out of fear of their parents give them a smack or something.
They figured out smacks don't hurt much.
Fair enough
The kid kicks cops in the groin. Cops who have guns and can drag you to jail. I'm pretty sure that threatening spankings isn't going to do very much. Besides, positive punishment is accepted as being the least effective reinforcement schedule available. Even if it solves one problem (Which it obviously wouldn't regarding this kid) it would likely do very little to solve the next one.
 

SyphonX

Coffee Bandit
Mar 22, 2009
956
0
0
If I could, I would taser every single one of you. After doing so, I would strip you, throw you in a cold cell for 24 hours, then charge you with an unfounded crime. A crime in which you have no defense because your word means nothing.

After all is said done, and you all feel ready to come back, I most warmly invite you to come restate your "I support the officer" claims, once more.

If you don't agree to that scenario, then you can all promptly shut your useless mouths.

None of you have absolutely any say in "supporting the law" for such a disgusting act, not until you experience pain and misery from out of control police and have your dignity and pride completely raped. If you have, and then you still hold onto your beliefs, then I will respect it. Till then, enjoy your merry little police state, just make sure to not make eye contact with your local officers. Ta