Agreed. She had it coming really.coxafloppin said:Id taser any ***** that kicked me in the nuts.
Agreed. She had it coming really.coxafloppin said:Id taser any ***** that kicked me in the nuts.
Oooh, yeah, that stupid 10 year old *****. Taze that stupid disrespectful *****.Id taser any ***** that kicked me in the nuts.
So pins and arm holds on a 10 year old is excessive force, making Tasering a legitimate alternative? Not a chance! I have 10 year old family member who I have wrestled with for fun, and I have pinned them with no danger and no fuss (I let them win most of the time of course). Granted a problem child will likely flail a lot more, but if you're even remotely competent, you will be unlucky if you get a light bruise, with almost no danger to the kid. As for tasers...well, lets just say that there's a reason why they have moved away from calling them, "Non-lethal weapons", and towards calling them, "Less-lethal weapons". Sure, a properly used taser on a full grown, healthy adult presents a fairly small risk, but a 10 year old girl? There's a fairly decent chance of that killing the child. Using basic pins and restraints would have been both easy and far, far safer.UltraParanoia said:Good for you. And no, the cops generally aren't allowed to use "magicalninjermoves" on people because the precincts don't like excessive force lawsuits every time someone uses them.TexaNigerian said:I personally know a few takedown manuvers that work on grown men and these law-enforcement professionals counld use one on an unarmed little girl?
Oh, I'm sorry, which factors in the situation am I failing to notice against your keen eye?PuppetMaster said:if a six year old in a no loitering zone who, when asked to comply, attacks and injures an officer, then yes. You have to look at all the factors instead of "OMG a cop tazered a little girl because she didn't want to shower?!!!1eleven!!"
I applaud you good sir. Especially on the first part. People get all nostalgic about the past, and completely forget that 99 times out of 100, it was just as bad, if not worse, back then.funguy2121 said:I'm sick of hearing all this "kids these days" bullshit. How old are the guys saying this, 80? Kids were always little shits.
I'd say after 14 taserin's fair game if there's no other way to subdue the kid. But a grown-ass man, and a trained police officer at that, who can't get a 10-yr-old into handcuffs and his squadcar backseat? Either it's bullshit, or that's one pussy-fied cop. I haven't worked out a day in my life, but I'd take a 10-year-old quarterback down before I tried to taser him/her.
At the very least, the cop should lose his badge forever. I wouldn't lose sleep if both he and the mother were charged with assault on a child, as well.
I guess that's why children from violent backgrounds always become high achievers in life.JimmyBassatti said:No one seems to realize she attacked a police officer. But, then again, when children are regarded as living Gods, it's pretty fucking stupid. If I was the mother, I'd simply beat the damn child. "Oh, child abuse, you monster!". No, it's called teaching a child respect.
I know you're just playing around, but I'm not playing around, sorry. This isn't a grown woman on drugs refusing to comply with a law enforcement officer (law enforcement, key term here folks). It was a 10 year old little girl. It's not funny, at all. I know you all think, "Well shit, I know it's bad, and a lot of cops are out of control, but I can't do anything about, so whatever." You can think that, fine, but you don't have to crack jokes at this crap. It's just evil Have none of you ever watched a Disney movie? You should know these things by now.HG131 said:Wow, were you a jock in school? Seriosuly, we like our BALLS!
I was really shocked to see you're from the UK. (Wait for me to conceal my sarcastic face.)Gingerman said:Good for the police officer and those who keep on yammering about how he shouldn't be a officer I really pity your narrow view on the world.
That approach is probably the most sure fire way of creating a little monster like this girl. Corporeal Punishment hasn't fallen out of favor because we have become weak as a society, it has fallen out of favor because it doesn't really work. It teaches a child to solve problems with violence. In the folksy wisdom of the average firm-handed nostalgic versus the peer reviewed science on behavior, I'm going with the science.JimmyBassatti said:No one seems to realize she attacked a police officer. But, then again, when children are regarded as living Gods, it's pretty fucking stupid. If I was the mother, I'd simply beat the damn child. "Oh, child abuse, you monster!". No, it's called teaching a child respect.
laughable on paper, but age is subjective. if the article was girl A called the cops on her room mate, girl B for situation X, when the cops arrived girl B was unruly, violent, ect and assaulted the officer, resulting in a tazering. you and anyone else would call that "problem solved" but as soon as girl B is a minor, you turn blind to the real issue.ugeine said:Oh, I'm sorry, which factors in the situation am I failing to notice against your keen eye?PuppetMaster said:if a six year old in a no loitering zone who, when asked to comply, attacks and injures an officer, then yes. You have to look at all the factors instead of "OMG a cop tazered a little girl because she didn't want to shower?!!!1eleven!!"
Possibly, the child's loitering could cause major civil unrest, and when finished injuring the officer she's going to go on a one girl rampage of wanton Hannah Montana influenced carnage? At which point assault with a weapon becomes the last option and the only way of stopping somebody that's about three foot tall?