ugeine said:
PuppetMaster said:
if a six year old in a no loitering zone who, when asked to comply, attacks and injures an officer, then yes. You have to look at all the factors instead of "OMG a cop tazered a little girl because she didn't want to shower?!!!1eleven!!"
Oh, I'm sorry, which factors in the situation am I failing to notice against your keen eye?
Possibly, the child's loitering could cause major civil unrest, and when finished injuring the officer she's going to go on a one girl rampage of wanton Hannah Montana influenced carnage? At which point assault with a weapon becomes the last option and the only way of stopping somebody that's about three foot tall?
laughable on paper, but age is subjective. if the article was girl A called the cops on her room mate, girl B for situation X, when the cops arrived girl B was unruly, violent, ect and assaulted the officer, resulting in a tazering. you and anyone else would call that "problem solved" but as soon as girl B is a minor, you turn blind to the real issue.
you do NOT assault an officer
you do NOT dissobey your parents