yeah i would stay away from the inbreeding dont want insane inbred people running around with chainsaws 0.o
*cough*Texas chainsaw Massacre*cough*
*cough*Texas chainsaw Massacre*cough*
Poll: Cousin Lovin'
- Thread starter ToastyTheCommie
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Cite the Hapsburgs he doesn't want mentally challenged childeren with oversized toungues and funny lips now does he? (All real side effects of incest in monarchies, these people were actually put on the throne, you see thats why monarchy is disgusting it always leads to incest)
Do you know where it's from, as in where in the world that image originates from?Shru1kan said:
I have a really hot second cousin but I don't want to have sex with her, I guess thats coz we are RELATED. Also one of my uncles married his 3rd cousin, they have kids, they're fine.
Okay, I'm seeing a lot of bigots on this thread.
Regardless of the genetic mutations that may occur if they have a kid (hint: they probably won't (double hint: first cousins have only a 6.25% chance of having the same alleles)), it would be wrong to deny them the opportunity to date/fuck each other. Would you restrict a man born without hands from breeding? Would you restrict a woman who was prne to breast cancer from breeding? Would you keep people with deadly allergies from breeding? These are all genetic traits that may harm the child, but as far as I know, nobody wants to stop these people from having kids.
So why the double standard? Why is it ok for some genetically risky people to breed and not others? I see no justification for seperating people just because they're cousins. If someone can make a moral argument that convinces me, do so. If you can tell me why giving your kids any kind of disorder at all is a crime, do that, too. But don't come in here and talk about genetic mutations when we already have cancer patients and mentally unstable folk having kids.
Regardless of the genetic mutations that may occur if they have a kid (hint: they probably won't (double hint: first cousins have only a 6.25% chance of having the same alleles)), it would be wrong to deny them the opportunity to date/fuck each other. Would you restrict a man born without hands from breeding? Would you restrict a woman who was prne to breast cancer from breeding? Would you keep people with deadly allergies from breeding? These are all genetic traits that may harm the child, but as far as I know, nobody wants to stop these people from having kids.
So why the double standard? Why is it ok for some genetically risky people to breed and not others? I see no justification for seperating people just because they're cousins. If someone can make a moral argument that convinces me, do so. If you can tell me why giving your kids any kind of disorder at all is a crime, do that, too. But don't come in here and talk about genetic mutations when we already have cancer patients and mentally unstable folk having kids.
If he hits it, he is required by law to put pics on the net.
I don't have problem with it.
Not in all states.TheTruePharoah said:
I don't have problem with it.
My second-cousin from Germany has the BIGGEST crush on me. I honestly don't know how to respond to her advances. But for your friend, advise him that it's probably not a good idea, as it'll cause family issues at the least, and that he should under no circumstances try to have kids with her. Aside from that, let him do what he wants- you've had your say.
QFT. But I vote you get extra points if you can successfully blame your cousins' pregnancy on some other cousin.Furburt said:
Well for starters there's a slight (very slight) logic failure there. You're talking about preventing one person an individual from reproducing at all... ever. The topic is dealing specifically with a pair of people. Now nobody is suggesting the lad or his cousin can't go out and have sex with people they aren't related to, simply that it is ill advised to do so between themselves.Godavari said:
Personally I don't see the whole "think of the mutant children" thing to be a contributing facotr. It just seems wrong to me, there's certainly the fear that the habit will carry on through that family thus leading to rather severe genetic issues. I think it has a lot to do with the standards of society, sure a 20 yr old and a 50 yr old could have a great relationship, but personally I don't think they should. Similarily if you're related to someone, you're not supposed to fall for them, that's something I think has been naturally (as well as socially) programmed into us.
But then it doesn't affect me. If it were happening in my family I'd be more concerned.
