Don't look into her boobs! [Image not available].Blindswordmaster said:Don;t look into her.....eyes!
Talia al Ghul?
Poll: Does Batman really need Robin?
- Thread starter Blindswordmaster
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Ive seen people saying that the current batman need robin to sort of act as a anchor for Batman and keep him flying strait and true.. I respond that the other character are doing that...
So I voted for Bat Girl because I like girls in Tight clothes....
Now if they added Robin in and DIDEN'T give him tights... Id be ok with it. Make it his Nickname or something. Perhaps another Alfred style character, that might be a nice spin on the lore. But Batman is enough.
So I voted for Bat Girl because I like girls in Tight clothes....
Now if they added Robin in and DIDEN'T give him tights... Id be ok with it. Make it his Nickname or something. Perhaps another Alfred style character, that might be a nice spin on the lore. But Batman is enough.
To be in all serious and being a hardcore Batman fan I have say Robin does not fit in right now with this series of movies becauses its just right after he got into character and Robin is just there to help out but no sir no sir. Robin is very cool but just not now maybe if they made a dark robin like in the comics like an older Tim Drake because he would be the best but if they wanna go in order start with Grayson and just foreget about Jason Todd cause he was not worth mentioning at all even though he died by the Joker. So hey its hollywood they do what they want
"Does Batman really need Robin?"
Better question: does Robin really need Batman?
I liked the recent movie's "The Dark Knight Returns"-style take on the vigilante copycatism that might generate someone like Robin. People are more likely to emulate Batman by dressing up AS Batman. And Batman is more likely to hand those people over to the authorities than to take them under his wing. Why, they're vigilantes after all. That's against the law! ;D
So in reality, if Robin really was the truly intelligent contender for the Batman throne, a cut above the rest in both skill and creativity...then why on Earth would he think tagging along with Batman himself is a good idea?? Seems like a poor career decision to me.
Better question: does Robin really need Batman?
I liked the recent movie's "The Dark Knight Returns"-style take on the vigilante copycatism that might generate someone like Robin. People are more likely to emulate Batman by dressing up AS Batman. And Batman is more likely to hand those people over to the authorities than to take them under his wing. Why, they're vigilantes after all. That's against the law! ;D
So in reality, if Robin really was the truly intelligent contender for the Batman throne, a cut above the rest in both skill and creativity...then why on Earth would he think tagging along with Batman himself is a good idea?? Seems like a poor career decision to me.
There is a site that catelogues several of the many, many double entendre's implying homosexuality between Batman and Robin, but I cannot in good conscience post a link to it, as several of the ads on the site give viruses and other problems these days.Blindswordmaster said:
Judging by the path and tone the movies have taken so far, i would only expect Robin to be brought into it as a non superhero character. Most likely to control batman due to the likely death of Alfred, because honestly im putting my money on him being killed in the next movie. Which will probably be due to Batman for some reason or something causing him to relive the death of his parents sending him over the edge blah blah blah. You can probably tell what im getting at.
see the problem with robin is that they always make him a child. Yes i know he is one but thats dont mean he should act like one if you know what i mean. Robin is added so the kids have something to relate to unless ur a brooding man with obsession with bats. I dont think robin should be in the next movie unless. However, they cant make him too dark or hell be just batman but smaller, pretty much making him pointless. If they were to put robin in the next movie they should make him dark but not so dark that there isnt a contrast between him and batman. at the same time they cant make him to light and happy cause it simply muddies batman and the whole dark and edgy thing hes got going.
Though I am perfectly content with Batman going solo. I think it is more than possible to write Robin in, and make him every bit as dark as Batman. It has to be done properly, but i think it could work. Heaven for-fend if we ever get another "Batman and Robin" movie that was a total joke. I can even watch the first 5 minutes of that ...thing.
In Bludhaven they have prisons. Those don't work any better than Arkham. Just sayin' it isn't always an asylum. Only 99.9% of the time.Zeromaeus said:
Which reminds me, why does Bats think it's a good idea to keep sending The Joker to the same insane asylum he keeps escaping from over and over? Batman could drive across the state line and get Joker thrown in an actual prison. Or tie him up and ditch him in a bad part of Tijuana. Or just kill the freaking idiot, like he should be doing with ANY villain who has proven he/she is capable of committing premeditated murder. This is the whole reason why people (like me) think Bats is a sociopathic kook, and why I welcome the injection of some humanity and pathos into the storyline.
1) Robin fulfills Batman's moral need to take care of people in a different way than beating the shit out of them. He also realises that the first Robin (Dick Grayson) is similar to him and thus doesn't want him to turn out the same.
2) Robin grounds Batman, makes sure he doesn't become evil or psycho. Basically makes him happy.
3) Batgirl is just cheesecake, but I want her too.
2) Robin grounds Batman, makes sure he doesn't become evil or psycho. Basically makes him happy.
3) Batgirl is just cheesecake, but I want her too.