This is my problem with the game really. It's compared to a fantasy rpg and not the previous fallout games.Instant K4rma said:Oblivion was better, but Fallout 3 was still fantastic.
This is my problem with the game really. It's compared to a fantasy rpg and not the previous fallout games.Instant K4rma said:Oblivion was better, but Fallout 3 was still fantastic.
The reason Me and so many others compare it to Oblivion is because it was made by the exact same team from Bethesda (props to Todd Howard). The 2 games are extremely similar gameplay wise, which is why they are always compared. Besides the enviornment, the 2 games have a very similar look, and play a lot alike, almost exactly alike.Hiphophippo said:This is my problem with the game really. It's compared to a fantasy rpg and not the previous fallout games.Instant K4rma said:Oblivion was better, but Fallout 3 was still fantastic.
It was good, but it wasn't the best RPG ever. I loved Oblivion much more.Furburt said:It's good, get it on PC if possible for mods and such. All versions are good though.
Not the best Fallout game, but a damn good game nonetheless.
*Leaves before flame war*
Why should it be compared to the other games? Oblivion and Fallout 3 are more similar.Hiphophippo said:This is my problem with the game really. It's compared to a fantasy rpg and not the previous fallout games.Instant K4rma said:Oblivion was better, but Fallout 3 was still fantastic.
And whos going to miss a few raiders anyway?Internet Kraken said:I definitely enjoyed it. I like dhow it just let the player go where they wanted. It didn't railroad them into certain areas and instead lets you explore the game at your own leisure. It's quite different from Dragon Age, for example. I seem to prefer it when an RPG follows the exploration shown in Fallout 3 and Oblivion. Sometimes I don't want to have to advance the plot to kill some people. Sometimes I just feel like murdering the crap out of some random thugs.