I see you one striker and raise you a Groza.Mr.Black said:What is the ugliest gun you've ever seen? Right now my money is on the Striker.
that is what we in the know refer to as tacticoolStarke said:Fulminated Mercury filled hollowpoints?GeneralGrant said:No, that isn't true. That all depends on what you shoot the head with.SteveBurger said:Is it true that there is a place in a man's head that, if you shoot it, it will blow up?
Is this as hillariously rediculous as I think it is?
![]()
Yes, they're very popular among hunters. I live in a county which doesn't allow you to hunt deer with modern rifles, and the season is extended for muzzel-loaders. I plan on taking mine out next week (Last week of the season).Exictednuke said:I have heard that some companies still produce muzzle loading rifles, is that true?
Sure thing. I might call you up on that tomorrow.Stickyreiss said:this deep of a debate is too much for a forum, typing all of this out can be much more efficient in an instant rely settingDanny Ocean said:snip
feel free to IM me
MSN-stickyrice@ameritech.net (old email, don't bother spamming)
Stickyreiss said:from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/may/10/20040510-122711-8996r/WestMountain said:Let the police handle it, and its better that less people die then that more people will feel safe with owning gun for threatening situations.
The statistics, contained in the department's fiscal 2005 budget performance report, show that the average response time for the highest-priority calls -- Priority 1 -- was 8 minutes, 25 seconds in fiscal 2003, up from 7 minutes, 19 seconds in fiscal 2002 and 7 minutes, 47 seconds in fiscal 2001.
think about what an intruder in your home, or a mugger on the streets can accomplish in 7 minutes. A weapon takes seconds to draw.
heroin is highly illegal right? most people who use it aren't exactly MENSA status, yet they can circumvent the system. I'm unable to find a real statistic, but I would estimate that just the sight of a gun drawn on them will cause most street criminals (the most common varieties) will flee. And in 47-49 states a CCW license is required to carry, and CCW permits require a class on self defense from a certified instructor.Steelfists said:That argument comes up a lot, and I always think that it is very unlikely that the ordinary citizen would be able to effectively defend himself or herself when faced with a criminal with a gun, AND if the country's prohibition laws work properly, the average criminal will either not have access to a gun or would not use the gun to rob an ordinary citizen.
What do you want to know about it?Starke said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS2MEN-C31U&feature=related ?
most criminals dont carry a loaded gun and use the sight of a gun to scare peopleStickyreiss said:from http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/may/10/20040510-122711-8996r/WestMountain said:Let the police handle it, and its better that less people die then that more people will feel safe with owning gun for threatening situations.
The statistics, contained in the department's fiscal 2005 budget performance report, show that the average response time for the highest-priority calls -- Priority 1 -- was 8 minutes, 25 seconds in fiscal 2003, up from 7 minutes, 19 seconds in fiscal 2002 and 7 minutes, 47 seconds in fiscal 2001.
think about what an intruder in your home, or a mugger on the streets can accomplish in 7 minutes. A weapon takes seconds to draw.
heroin is highly illegal right? most people who use it aren't exactly MENSA status, yet they can circumvent the system. I'm unable to find a real statistic, but I would estimate that just the sight of a gun drawn on them will cause most street criminals (the most common varieties) will flee. And in 47-49 states a CCW license is required to carry, and CCW permits require a class on self defense from a certified instructor.Steelfists said:That argument comes up a lot, and I always think that it is very unlikely that the ordinary citizen would be able to effectively defend himself or herself when faced with a criminal with a gun, AND if the country's prohibition laws work properly, the average criminal will either not have access to a gun or would not use the gun to rob an ordinary citizen.
Every time someone brings up gun control, people on the other side say let the police handle it. Time from when a burglar enters your house to when he could hurt or kill you: I'd give that one a minute tops. Police response time: average 8 or so minutes, isn't it?WestMountain said:Let the police handle it, and its better that less people die then that more people will feel safe with owning gun for threatening situations.Stickyreiss said:majorly simplified answer: If owning guns is a criminal act, law abiding citizens will not have them, the majority criminals however will not be stopped. Then, how do we defend ourselves in a threatening situation? I can go on if you want, thats just the one of the strongest points IMO.Steelfists said:...
That thing is just too damn huge.
OT: Justify the right to bear arms in the USA when the firearms murder rate is substantialy lower in countries where the average citizen cannot own a gun, and specifically handguns.
yes. There is even a muzzle-loader only season in some states.Exictednuke said:I have heard that some companies still produce muzzle loading rifles, is that true?