Steelfists said:
Stickyreiss said:
Steelfists said:
...
That thing is just too damn huge.
OT: Justify the right to bear arms in the USA when the firearms murder rate is substantialy lower in countries where the average citizen cannot own a gun, and specifically handguns.
majorly simplified answer: If owning guns is a criminal act, law abiding citizens will not have them, the majority criminals however will not be stopped. Then, how do we defend ourselves in a threatening situation? I can go on if you want, thats just the one of the strongest points IMO.
*EDIT*
My most recent paper was actually about the firearms policies in america, and i can post excerpts if requested
That argument comes up a lot, and I always think that it is very unlikely that the ordinary citizen would be able to effectively defend himself or herself when faced with a criminal with a gun, AND if the country's prohibition laws work properly, the average criminal will either not have access to a gun or
would not use the gun to rob an ordinary citizen.
I think the last point is key.
And to answer AlexTheBucket I was talking to a judge yesterday and he said that most countries have constitutions (he was talking about how the UK doesn't have a constitution).
first off, that point you think is key is bunk. MOST guns used in crimes in the united states are illegally possessed to begin with, so you argument that the criminals wont use them is flawed.
second, when you look at the us as a whole yes, the violent crime rates are high. HOWEVER, when you look at each individual state the situation becomes much different. funnily enough the states with the MOST RESTRICTIVE gun laws also usually happen to have the HIGHEST violent crime rates, where states with more lax gun laws typically have LOWER violent crime rates.
also, when you factor in prosecution of gun crimes (aka, illegal gun ownership), those states that prosecute violators of such crimes again have lower crime rates. as an example, virginia, a state with only 16 million residents, had more prosecutions in 2002 for people found with illegal weapons than california, pennsylvania, new york, illionis and washington dc COMBINED, despite those states having a population of over 100 million combined. another fact is that in washington dc2002, out of over 2000 illegal gun owners arrested, only 2 were actually prosecuted.
and heres some more facts. despite america having a higher violent crime rate countries with restrictive gun laws, those same countries typically have higher petty crime rates (home burglary, robbery, muggings, etc) than the us. also, germany, which has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the world, has had 3 times more school shootings resulting in 5 times more deaths than the us has.
sorry, but guns arent the problem, the problem is loopholes that allow criminals to get guns in the first place and court systems that dont prosecute laws that are in effect.
finally, how would the ordinary citizen NOT be able to effectively defend themselves against those threatening them with guns? do you know women who are in a threatening situation have a significantly higher chance of escaping unharmed if they even pull out a gun, let alone use it? the statistics are there, people CAN effectively defend themselves with guns, and MOST OF THE TIME they can do so without ever firing it.