pretty much sums it upGotta Laugh at How people behave these days.. Jumpin in and oot ae bed wae every tom dick n harry tht will huv them has become the norm a mean wats wrong wae actually gettin 2 know sum1 1st n havin a bit of self respect or im i just old fashioned? Lmao!
Please translate that for meKarma168 said:To quote a friend from facebook:
pretty much sums it upGotta Laugh at How people behave these days.. Jumpin in and oot ae bed wae every tom dick n harry tht will huv them has become the norm a mean wats wrong wae actually gettin 2 know sum1 1st n havin a bit of self respect or im i just old fashioned? Lmao!
"Jumping in and out of bed with every Tom, Dick and Harry that will Have them has become the norm. I mean, what's wrong with actually getting to know someone first and having a bit of self respect? Or Am I just old fashioned?"Ryouma said:Negative poll is negative.
If people feel like sleeping with loads of partners why not?
Just hope they remember to wear protection when they are with people they arent secure about, when it comes to std.
Please translate that for meKarma168 said:To quote a friend from facebook:
pretty much sums it upGotta Laugh at How people behave these days.. Jumpin in and oot ae bed wae every tom dick n harry tht will huv them has become the norm a mean wats wrong wae actually gettin 2 know sum1 1st n havin a bit of self respect or im i just old fashioned? Lmao!![]()
"Other" - really you just need a choice for "I don't mind what people do" - your bias is evident in the "choices" you have in your poll.D Moness said:So, it is likely that many here that sleep around and many that don't. The question isn't whether or not you have a lot of sex with different people but rather how do you view someone who does? The type of person isn't in question because they are how you would image someone that have sex with lots of people to be, whatever that might be. This thread is not meant to bash on those people but is analyze people's perspectives on sex.
To make this a little easier, I've included a poll that doesn't make real sense with the answers but for the sake of trying to be funny i added it.
Your arrogance is borderline incredible when all you've basically said is "I don't like your arguments therefore they are invalid." I love how you basically vetoed responding to anything I specifically said. Classy.immovablemover said:Why would I say "look it up" and call it a fallacy if I was referencing the fact you're scottish? Google is your friend.Jonabob87 said:That's funny because I am a Scotsman (if that's why you brought that up then ignore that sentence).
This is the third and final time I'm going to say this, If you repeat the same glaring and corrected mistake again i'm going to assume you're either a troll, an idiot, or both. Niether are worth my time.I'm actually working from experience, almost everyone I meet around here has a single parent. Testament to the fact that the UK has the highest rates of teen pregnancy in europe and these "couples" rarely stick it.
Let's say 1,000,00 of the 55,000,000 UK population has a one night stand using a condom. 3% of 1,000,000 is still 30,000 and that is no small number. Remembering that the pill can also fail and how much of a joke the rhythm method is (I can tell you THAT from experience) it amounts to larger than 3% of "safe sex" encounters. Also taking into account that so many of these encounters take place under the effects of drugs, alcohol or both very often there is no safe sex at all, just sex.
If a person is SAFE, COURTEOUS and RESPONSIBLE then go ahead and be promiscuous. That means they need to use Contraception, they go into it knowing that its a one night stand and that they take responsibility of the consequences.
Secondly, We are not talking about the amount of sex a person has, we're talking about the amount of sexual partners a person has. Your failure rates examples are a MOOT/INVALID/IRRELEVANT because it addresses a different issue. If I have sex with 1 person 100 times and 3 of those times it fails, I have gotten someone pregnant the exact same amount of times that I would of if i'd had sex with 100 women 1 time with 3 failures.
This is, of course, overlooking Plan B contraception and abortion.
Thirdly, and It is really irking me that you're simply not listening to this -
Stop equating promiscuity to irresponsibility and immaturity
All of your counter examples have hinged on completely ignoring all of my qualifiers. I say "Only when they're safe, know what the deal is, and are responsible" and you just go "But they're unsafe, all drugged up and will run away the moment someone gets pregnant"
Then OBVIOUSLY I don't agree with promiscuity when they're not being safe, not being honest and are not willing to deal with the consequences. Thats why I keep repeating "As long as they do these things".
Understanding yet?
I'd agree if it wasn't for the existing risk of pregnancy or STD transmission REGARDLESS of how safe someone is, which is exactly what I said.If a person is SAFE, COURTEOUS and RESPONSIBLE then go ahead and be promiscuous.
That's exactly my point, if you sleep with one person you can't get them pregnant multiple times can you? If you sleep with 100 people you will (statistically) get 3 different people pregnant and/or cause the transmission of STDs.Secondly, We are not talking about the amount of sex a person has, we're talking about the amount of sexual partners a person has. Your failure rates examples are a MOOT/INVALID/IRRELEVANT because it addresses a different issue. If I have sex with 1 person 100 times and 3 of those times it fails, I have gotten someone pregnant the exact same amount of times that I would of if i'd had sex with 100 women 1 time with 3 failures.
Someone's taking the internet too seriously.Why would I say "look it up" and call it a fallacy if I was referencing the fact you're scottish? Google is your friend.
I'm sure you say the same to everyone who disagrees with you.immovablemover said:and we're done; you're an idiot.Jonabob87 said:snip