Entitled said:
This goes both ways, there were plenty of games that's direction the average hardcore gamer was pretty cynical about, that indeed ended up selling below expectations, like Resident Evil 6, Dead Space 3, Syndicate, or Warfighter.
That's not "going both ways." RE6 sold roughly 5 million as was deemed a failure. Dead Space 3 was set to sales expectations of over five million just to consider continuing the franchise. You might as well include Tomb Raider in this list. Or any other SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEENIX title that was "disappointing."
Yes, you can argue that they sold worse than their predecessors (in a couple cases), but the sales predictions were unrealistic and the outcomes are still in sync with that. But I think you're on about something different entirely here, so...
Even if someone on an online forum crying "boycott" would be an ineffective way of predicting failure, it would hardly be a countereffective way, so that you can use it as an inndicator predicting success.
This is like saying "Last time my magic 8 Ball said that the Republicans would win the election and they still lost, and this time it says the same that they will win, therefore I think that they will lose again."
It's more like saying "Gamers have demonstrated they will buy anyway, and even Entitled's claims demonstrate games that sold pretty damn well like Resident Evil 6, so I have a foundation for a speculative opinion that it will sell well."
But hey, don't let actual statements get in the way of imagined ones.
I'm not trying to be a scientific predictor here. Speaking of....
No, it's not even really like that. A magic 8 Ball is entirely random, while whether or not hardcore gamers like a game is indeed the indicator of a corporation failing to appeal to a certain audience. Maybe it's sometimes a weak indicator, as hardcore gamers can be circumvented, but it's still a bad sign, and it needs proof of WHY another audience would like the Xbox One.
Can you actually demonstrate it's the hardcore base that's shunning these games? I'm betting you can't, because that would be an impressive feat. Not quite the saga of Hercules, but it would be impressive nonetheless.
To recap, you're offering a counterclaim to a claim I'm not making while making a claim on the nature of the sales in question that appears to be based in assumption. And somehow, you're questioning my logic (the logic you're disputing not being my own)?
Huh. That's...odd.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: a lot of what gamers are calling "victories" are not gamers standing up and fighting so much as the games industry over-extending themselves. It's their game to lose, and they're losing it. They're predicting twenty million sales or whatever on a sequel to a game that only made two or three (and I use "only" in comparison) and then gamers cheer when the game still sells twice as many units as before because "we sure showed them buy only buying the new game two to one over the last one! WOOHOO!"
To borrow from Jim Sterling, game companies need to understand that having a higher number at the end of a title is not a guarantee of higher sales. But I think also, gamers need to be reminded of the same, as a lot of the "failures" expressed here are predicated on the projections that come from a corporate need for rapid growth to please shareholders. THQ, Ubisoft and CDProjekt all value(d) their bases as comparable or greater to the install base of the Call of Duty franchise, a franchise that sets records pretty much every year. EA wants Call of Duty sales, and sets projections in that ballpark. And that's the problem.
I would like those numbers on hardcore gamers, though. Until I have some sort of real numbers, though, I'll tend to look at the rather lukewarm response the casual market had towards a lot of these games and just go "hmmmm...."
correlation doesn't indicate causation, but correlation is enough to investigate further or hypothesise.
You are right about one thing, though. Even if the Xbone sells well, it won't be because of my opinion on the matter. My opinion exists regardless of any future data gathered on sales. It's speculation, as this thread asked for.