I wanted to like it, but just couldn't bring myself to do so. I did enjoy Waltz's portrayal of his character and found myself oddly wishing that the movie had been about his character and that the "inglorious basterds" were totally absent from the movie.atalanta said:I agree that was how it was marketed, and I dragged my feet on going to see it for exactly this reason (I loved Reservoir Dogs like burning, but I didn't care so much for Kill Bill), but I was pleasantly surprised by it -- sure it was bloody, but the scenes starring Landa or Shosanna, and the Mexican stand-off in the pub (before the SHOOT EVERYONEEEE bit) were excellent without having blood splurting everywhere.Mythbhavd said:No, I didn't like the movie. It was just another attempt by Tarantino to try to make money by putting in bloody scenes ad nauseum. He knows that the 13-21 crowd loves it. Acting wise, however, Christoph Waltz did a fantastic job. The movie is worth seeing just to see such a good job acting. I'm glad I didn't pay anything to see it. Even free, except for Waltz' acting, the movie wasn't worth the price.