I know it's a debate. And this is my opinion! Woo hoo! OPINIONS R GRATE.Zeeky_Santos said:It's a debate man, there are affirmative and negative, that's it.tehweave said:Okay, there needs to be a third option.
I've had sex. I've had GOOD sex. But you can't really compare the two. Sex is used for two things: A fun activity for two adults to do, to create another person. While neither is necessary, both are fun to a certain extent.
We need food to LIVE. If we don't get a steady diet of sustanance, our bodies will whither away. If we don't eat ANYTHING in 30 days, we die. If we don't have sex for 30 days either we're married or going through a dry spell.
The point I'm trying to make? You can't compare the two. One is REQUIRED for us to live, the other, some people go their entire lives without. (Those people are known as CRAZY.)
That being said, the greatest food I have ever eaten is better than the best blowjob I've ever received. The greatest pie I've ever had is better than the best sexual experience I've ever had.
Don't let your guard down, now.Greyfox105 said:Food is necessary for life to continue, sex isn't...
Sure, sex is necessary for a species to continue, but we could remove sex from our lives, and the species could continue through other methods.
Food beats sex, any day.
Plus, I don't think you'd catch a rather nasty STD from a hamburger...
Sorry, my joke-detection-meter is a little off when I'm hungry.Reenix said:True, but I think you missed the joke that 100.1% of people suggests that some like their food a little TOO much...and thus count for .1 of an another person.Dyp100 said:Why do you say that? Some people like sex, we're designed to.Reenix said:Hmm, 100.1% people have voted. Which is surprising since only 33.8% voted for food - although I suspect most people voted 'sex' for their self-confidence issues.
OP is asking what is better, not what is more essential.
But you're right in that some people (myself included) would rather have a 3-course shag than a 3-course meal![]()
Lmao...you read my mind. It's true that even when the sex isn't stellar, it's still pretty good. Food on the other hand..... if it's bad...yuck. Think food poisoning. Not good at all.Frequen-Z said:Bad sex is still good sex, but bad food is not good food.
So, I voted sex.
Exactly. I don't see how a big bowl of sauerkraut could be better than sex. For at any time sex can easily be around 50% in your head, meaning it's not always as visceral as you'd expect. However, there is little mistaking that undeniable quality of fermented cabbage (Which is a good thing, don't get me wrong). I hope I don't see the day when I'm hankering for a bowl of sauerkraut when good old fashioned vagina is on the menu...Jack_Uzi said:Could be both, depends on what's on the menu, really.