I like this guy. I agree completely, it's extremely frustrating having all friends that buy a new game and never play the single player. It makes Developers not care about the single player(at least it's seeming that way) and focus only on multiplayer. It sucks for people like me who should be the majority but is obviously not.DevilWolf47 said:Not only Nay but if i ever see someone who advocates it, i will blow his head off, use his thyroid as a condom and fuck his pets and then force his family to watch the videos. So many people have this frankly backwards notion that multiplayer is more important than the main campaign, and it's beginning to do serious harm to the quality of games as a whole.
I did read the whole post, I just cut part of it because it wasn't relevant.manythings said:Valkyrie101 said:It's not that simple. Time and money expended on a multiplayer mode are time and money not expended on single player, and there's a finite amount of both. I don't see the point of attaching a multiplayer option that's going to be inferior to dedicated multi games already in existence, and just be ignored.manythings said:I'm not a nay or a yay. If they don't it's not like it needed it, if they do it's not like we have to play it. If it's there I'll give it a try, maybe they'll make it good.If you're going to respond read my whole post in the future.manythings said:I'm not a nay or a yay. If they don't it's not like it needed it, if they do it's not like we have to play it. If it's there I'll give it a try, maybe they'll make it good.
It's still just a rumour and since pretty much everything is getting multiplayer it's just one of a hundred rumours that sounded more plausible and was picked up. Co-op would be cool.
It's wholly relevant, I view the news as spurious and just something that was said because the times make it sound likely.Valkyrie101 said:I did read the whole post, I just cut part of it because it wasn't relevant.
No, it isn't relevant. I was discussing whether or not it would be a good thing. It probably is a rumour, but that does not affect this hypothetical scenario.manythings said:It's wholly relevant, I view the news as spurious and just something that was said because the times make it sound likely.Valkyrie101 said:I did read the whole post, I just cut part of it because it wasn't relevant.