lolmynamewastaken said:
M1911 all the way. i love modern pistols because they're pretty much all based on that...
...apart from the Browning 9mm Hi-Power mk III, on which John Moses Browning based the design of the .45 pistol that became the 1911, 1911A1 and so on.
To those of you going for revolvers because they fire such big rounds, isn't the Desert Eagle .50 AE [http://www.magnumresearch.com/Expand.asp?ProductCode=DE50] enough?
Unless you're an amazingly good shot and trying to take out a hostage-taker on the far side of the street, accuracy boils down to how well you shoot with that weapon.
At 25 metres this little chunk of steel can put a group the size of a lady's palm into a non-threatening paper target:
... but that's its job. It's probably a good choice for rats and rabbits, if you can get a holster for it.
If you want that length with bigger bullets, we're back to Magnum Research:
If you're actually trying to be accurate, of course, you want a two-handed weapon.
One big advantage of a revolver, as mentioned above, is that you can fire shorter, less powerful rounds from it. They're cheaper, the recoil's lighter, the weapon's still scary and, as Harry points out, the heavier weapon is more stable:
Yeah, oops?
Overall, for design, manufacturer, model, calibre, power, bullet type and everything else, the most effective one is the one with which you can most reliably hit your target.
...
Oh, and gold plating? Rather expensive way to rust-proof a gun, but hey, it works.