Poll: Modern Warfare Three Is Better Than Battlefield 3

Recommended Videos

holographicman

New member
Oct 6, 2009
382
0
0
Custard_Angel said:
From what I've seen of MW3 and BF3:

IT'S THE SAME FUCKING GAME YOU ELITIST DICKS

Graphics be damned.
this.
a military shooter is a military shooter is a military shooter
 

TG MLPDashie

New member
Apr 9, 2010
152
0
0
LebbyLegs said:
scoober1111 said:
WHAT THE F**K!!

i make a poll just like this, but mine was better as in wasn't sided towards modern warfare 3 or BF3, but mine is removed and this one stays up. come on Moderators get off your ass and don't be one sided with peoples topics...
XD Im a lucky sonovabitch :p
Im sure retribution is coming my way young Phelps
1. Im most likely older than you.
2. I make polls that aren't one sided.
3. Your not lucky and the moderators just take pity on you.
 

5t3v0

New member
Jan 15, 2011
317
0
0
Im here thinking that the BF3 story will actually be better or at least more coherant than MW3. Seriously, Fridge logic kicked in hard in MW2. I was playing it thinking "OMFG this is SOOOO awesome!" then later, I thought about it again, and it hit me... "WHAT THE FUCK? WHY DID YOUR GENERAL JUST KILL YOU? And how the hell did that EMP reach that far? And how did russia invade the US with a crippled infrastructure possibly still recovering from the civil war? Why am I also shooting a country that is realistically not even evil either? What happened to the Government loyalists?" and so forth.

Also, that destruction makes me cream meself. Oh i7... You are going to be put to use when I finish buying the rest of your parts...
 

BloodSquirrel

New member
Jun 23, 2008
1,263
0
0
When CoD starts focusing on gameplay again instead of scripted sequences I'll consider that, potentially, it could be better than Battlefield 3. Until then, it'll be at the very bottom of the shooter heap for me.
 

Swaggerfi

New member
May 26, 2009
1
0
0
Personally I enjoy both COD games and BF games
that said I think both will be good but BF3 will be the better
 

Dragunai

New member
Feb 5, 2007
534
0
0
Juk3n said:
Dragunai said:
Right well, Thanks for bringing quickscopers into Black ops, I guess I was having too much fun without those no skill c**ts around to ruin the game.
Black Ops has a different developer from Modern Warfare.

The AK74u is NOT over powered, it is simply over used. People get the two confused when they keep getting pwned by the same weapon on multiple enemies.

Quickscoping takes skill, and it's not even a factor, have you seen the KD'S of quickscopers? Even Optic "pros" go through multiple trash gameplays before they get a Youtube worthy one. Know why? Because if you're even HALF competent at FPSs a quickscoper rushing spawn shouldn't get anywhere near you before you've mowed him down.

People don't play MW for the "realism" we play for the thrills.

And even though you're only 14 years old, you shouldnt really need this stuff explained to you.

/signed A CoD FanBoy.
Right:

unfunny, pointlessly inserted Age quips ... Check
"You cant play the game" ... Check
"You dont know what you're talking about" ... Check

Yep you clear the checklist of someone who just got utterly burned by someone and is doing their best to offend them with the same crap everyone hears and makes jokes about in millions of forums just like this one.

SO, Thanks for being such an easy mark without me even aiming for you.

Still, Feel like saying something worthwhile? or you just going to keep sitting saying the same clichés I can find in any of 10,000,000 other posts regarding this game?

Although Thank you for being the perfect example of a COD player harkening to why the BF community is considerably better as it is not infested with 101 12yr olds like the ones I have had the misfortune of meeting in games like MW2 who sit making racist comments because they think they are baby "gangstas"

The 74u IS over powered as I can happily prove in my theater where I have effectively used it to snipe across massive distances, which in itself, is hilariously and ironically inaccurate of the weapons design as it is an SMG and if you actually understood real warfare instead of play pretending you do because you played a game of COD once and because take your dad's rifle up the ass daily, you would know SMGs are breach and enter weapons design for close range engagements and thus suffer massive accuracy loss over long range.

Yes I know Bl:Ops is a separate Dev - Infinity ward did the MW series and Treyarch did the WW2 games and the laughably poor Vietnam one. You're lucky you have wikipedia to help you with these things else you'd look like more of a moron than you did to begin with.

As for the whole quickscoper thing. You're right if you are half competent they don't get near you when they rush. Too bad many of them camp in close quarters areas or hide around corners with only a handful charging head long into my assault rifle. How many times a game do you die to them I wonder? After all you presented such deep findings I am left to assume you must be their favorite lunch.

Feel free to come back at me with more cheap shots as I really am unphased by them and merely enjoy stomping on peoples feeble attempts to attack me with remarks you get when you google "things a 12yr old would say on forums" before you copy paste them here =)

Indecently staying on topic:

Despite the easier use of sniper rifles in BC2 / Vietnam you get proportionally fewer snipers (in my experience anyway) than you do on any CoD game. Mainly cause BF players have the balls to come out and fight.

BC2 / Vietnam see's more engineers and medics than it does the other classes however this is because the medic is an easy point scorer and a functionally fun class to play with the LMGs being balanced (good stopping power / ammo count HUGE reload times in some cases) with the Engineers using SMGs and being tank hunters to wipe out the COD players who play BF games and then hide in tanks the whole time.

There is a better choice of weapons in BC2 which was expanded in 'nam

BC2 has better gfx, I know its a petty statement but its one most people retreat to so I'm going to mention it now. These gfx were improved in the 'nam expansion meaning that a DLC for BC2 is actually better than the core engine for Bl:eek:ps

You can't drop shot in BC2 meaning no sackless cowards diving to the floor crying the instant someone see's them.

No perks in BC2 meaning that player effectiveness in a round is on their back not modified by the same perks you saw in MW1 just reshuffled in MW2 then shuffled some more in World at War before being shuffled one more time into Bl:Ops and they will undoubtedly be shuffled again in MW3... Thanks for the effort IW

You can shoot though more than the preordained set pieces in BC2

If realism isn't a factor then why play Black ops? Its designed to be realistic as far as sucking your thumb to regen lost limbs goes. And if I hadnt stapled that point to your forehead you would have said "But Bl:Ops is realistic" so it really is just a "Wave the flag in the direction that most suits you" point of case.

Long Story short?
(ironically BC2 has a longer more interesting story than CoDs)

In BC2 I have had the immersive thrill of charging into a town as tanks roll by me dropping walls and firing on the enemy as my comrades fire into the enemy position, medics reviving the fallen as helicopters fly over head strafing the enemy positions.

You can't replicate that feeling in Black Ops. You wont get it in MW3 either but BF3 will bring it to the table.

So That's my 2nd reason on why I am going with Dice over IW.

Want to come at me again try hard?
 

SoloStoffe

New member
Apr 2, 2010
2,044
0
0
Battlefield 3 will simply be better.

http://thegamingliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/DINOBF3.jpg
Muddaeffin' dinosaurs.
 

0p3rati0n

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,885
0
0
LebbyLegs said:
Personally I think Modern Warfare Three is going to be a much more fulfilling experience than Battlefield Three,
If your talking about fulfilling as in no one figures out the exploits for about a month, then yes. But here's a thought?? WAIT TILL BOTH GAMES COME OUT! Then you can tell us which one is more fulfilling than the other with some decent backup to your theory.

mainly due to the story which will finally see its conclusion.
Are you serious? 90% of the CoD community gets Call of Duty for the multiplayer. I know people who barely even touch single player.

However I seem to be in the vast minority on this opinion, everyone seems to think Battlefield Three will be an epic experience of jesus proportions!
Thoughts below.
Battlefield will probably stay alive longer than MW because they don't create a game every year. MW3 will be fun for the first month or two. Then people will find out exploits and all shit goes down hill. Even if IW does what Treyarch did in terms of updates and patches there will still be idiots using exploits. Don't believe me? Rewind and evaluate with every Call of Duty down to CoD4. Hell Treyarch is putting out patches and updates on a steady stream and yet there are still Famas and ghost assholes.
 

EternalFacepalm

Senior Member
Feb 1, 2011
809
0
21
Battlefield 3. Also, don't make more of the same option, it makes it harder to see the actual damn result. >_<
I don't think I'll buy it anyway, though. My computer is basically crap.
 

aba1

New member
Mar 18, 2010
3,248
0
0
I already bought modern warfare 2 so I own both those games already
 

Juk3n

New member
Aug 14, 2010
222
0
0
Dragunai said:
Juk3n said:
Dragunai said:
Right well, Thanks for bringing quickscopers into Black ops, I guess I was having too much fun without those no skill c**ts around to ruin the game.
Black Ops has a different developer from Modern Warfare.

The AK74u is NOT over powered, it is simply over used. People get the two confused when they keep getting pwned by the same weapon on multiple enemies.

Quickscoping takes skill, and it's not even a factor, have you seen the KD'S of quickscopers? Even Optic "pros" go through multiple trash gameplays before they get a Youtube worthy one. Know why? Because if you're even HALF competent at FPSs a quickscoper rushing spawn shouldn't get anywhere near you before you've mowed him down.

People don't play MW for the "realism" we play for the thrills.

And even though you're only 14 years old, you shouldnt really need this stuff explained to you.

/signed A CoD FanBoy.
if you actually understood real warfare instead of play pretending
no one plays GAMES to experience REAL warfare you numbskull, especially not CoD. And yes, i do try hard, i love trying hard, im competitive, so i try my best when on a team..this is normal for alot of gamers, im not sure why "trying hard" would be a derogatory term? :) kthx
 

jpoon

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,995
0
0
No way at all that MW3 will best BF3. There's just far too much that MW3 won't include that BF3 will, this puts battlefield a new notches above MW by default for me.
 

0p3rati0n

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,885
0
0
Dragunai said:
Being a Try Hard is being that one guy at the party who acts like he is drunk to be the cool one. In gaming terms or online its the lamer who comes into a thread and pointlessly insults someone with crap insults that no one finds funny or offensive before making a total fool of himself. This works irl too.
Your confusing try hard with being cocky. Try hard is a quite self-explanitory. It's someone who puts too much effort into something. Not go off as a douche-bag and suck at a game.

Besides if you have to try in a game you're probably shit at it anyway. I play COD games half awake with a microwave pizza in one hand and still average a 15:4 K/D.
This is why Call of Duty is shit and why is needs more of a learning curve.
 

Hoplon

Jabbering Fool
Mar 31, 2010
1,839
0
0
Where is the "they will both sort of be middle of the road" option?

honestly they make too much money for the publishers to let well enough alone for either of them to be good.
 

Dragunai

New member
Feb 5, 2007
534
0
0
0p3rati0n said:
Dragunai said:
Being a Try Hard is being that one guy at the party who acts like he is drunk to be the cool one. In gaming terms or online its the lamer who comes into a thread and pointlessly insults someone with crap insults that no one finds funny or offensive before making a total fool of himself. This works irl too.
Your confusing try hard with being cocky. Try hard is a quite self-explanitory. It's someone who puts too much effort into something. Not go off as a douche-bag and suck at a game.

Besides if you have to try in a game you're probably shit at it anyway. I play COD games half awake with a microwave pizza in one hand and still average a 15:4 K/D.
This is why Call of Duty is shit and why is needs more of a learning curve.
Yeah I thought I screwed up my definition of Try Hard, Thanks for clearing that up.

When I play BC2 I do tend to have to pay attention to the game to make kills.
My KD on BC2 is worse than my KD on Bl:Ops. Mostly because I use a TB X11 headset with Ninja pro, so I can hear shit before it even happens and know where people are just from their footsteps.

Hell I can even tell you what gun they are using just from them reloading it on the other side of a wall. Cant do that in BC2 though ^^
 

Tdc2182

New member
May 21, 2009
3,623
0
0
Compelling argument.

I think that MW3 is going to be the least innovative out of all the series so far and may in fact mark the end for the series as a whole.
I'll no doubt still like it, because as long as they don't change the engine, IW has yet to make a game that I don't spend a few days worth in.

Battlefield 3 will very much be an amazing and well designed game... for those 10 or so people who can run the highest settings on their PC's which were obtained by sacrificing innocences to Satan. The console version will fall flat on it's face like BC2 did because of poor clunky controls that are too much of a distraction from the gameplay, and rather toned down graphics making everything look like a slideshow.

People will blindly love it because it has sadly gotten to the point where fans of CoD will no longer accept a game that isn't perfect and will learn to hate the shit out of BF3 just as well.

Me... Well, I think I've reached my stride for Modern FPS shooters. I was rather pleased with the titles coming out this year like Skyrim and Assassin's Creed. I figure I'll just bide my time with them.
 

Herbsk

New member
May 31, 2011
184
0
0
Jack and Calumon said:
Where's the option for them both sucking? Or, "I don't give a fuck about either of them"?

Heck, where's the option for "Wait until the games come out before you start making assumptions over the general quality."

Aye aye aye, we have this so often that x will outshine y for no reason. Personally, I think Mass Effect 3 will kick both of their asses, but it's not thread worthy.

OT: I'll judge when they both give us some multiplayer footage to go on.

Calumon: Maybe everyone in this thread has a magical crystal ball and can see anything they want! :D
I select this man's option - Specifically, I don't give a damn about either - Go Mass Effect 3!