Poll: Would you kill a man?
- Thread starter XxNoMercyxX
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Hmmm...to defend myself, maybe. To defend my significant other/friend/family, hell yes. Straight up, he'd get a kunai in the throat. I practice with mine every day and sharpen them every night. I can hit a target the size of a maple leaf from twelve paces consistently.
I'd really try not too, as there is no way of knowing what's going on in the intruder's head. People can sometimes do crazy things entirely out of character if something snaps, and I personally feel it would be a terrible thing to kill someone without knowing the reason why they're in my house in the first place.
Having never been in this situation however, I really can't give a proper answer.
Having never been in this situation however, I really can't give a proper answer.
Well I've made a comfortable hobby out of inviting women over to my house, sleeping with them then drugging their water, killing them and dissecting their bodies so yeah killing a man would be a nice fresh new thing.
Okay seriously only in self defence or Rorschach style stret justice killing the criminals that the law couldn't arrest.
Okay seriously only in self defence or Rorschach style stret justice killing the criminals that the law couldn't arrest.
If I couldn't think/act clearly enough to shoot him in, say, the arm holding the gun or the leg or something then yes, I'd shoot to kill. I'd rather shoot the legs (knees as a last resort...it's about as bad as a good shot in the testes and a bit more wheelchair-inducing) or ideally, the arm/hand holding the gun. Or somehow disable the guy. But if it came down to it I'd kill someone who was trying to kill me assuming I hadn't done something and felt like I needed to die for it, but I'd probably not be walking around free after something like that.
I'd kill him, but only after disarming him, binding him in a brutal stress position, stripping off all his clothing, starving him for a few days, flaying off much of his skin, waterboarding him for untold hours, raping him up the arse with writing utensils, roasting him over an open fire, then crucifying him inside an ice-cold meat locker to see whether the hypothermia or asphyxiation get him first. You know, like the CIA does, all non-prosecutable-because-we-have-to-cover-our-own-asses style.
I've never wanted to kill a person, so first of all I'd try to disarm him or knock him out. However if that didn't work then ofcourse I would kill him.
for all those who said they'd simply 'subdue' the guy, you kinda gotta think about those weird cases. ie: robber falls through skylight and falls on a knife. sues and WINS. also, some other robber got attacked by a dog. sued, and WINS.
though killing someone so as not to get sued isn't a very good reason... but as they say, 'don't pull a gun unless you plan to kill.'
or something like that.
though killing someone so as not to get sued isn't a very good reason... but as they say, 'don't pull a gun unless you plan to kill.'
or something like that.
No. I reckon if a man/woman endangered the lives of my family/friends I could probably put him/her in enough pain to immobilize him/her and then I'd phone the police. I couldn't kill a man. I couldn't take a life.