- Mar 31, 2010
- 7,170
- 143
- 68
- Country
-
- Gender
-
True, that would put an end to all suffering, all pain, all torment. But it would also end all the good things in this world; the laugh of a happy child, the tenderness of two lover's first kiss, the excitement of a rollercoaster, the beauty of the sun coming up over the mountains... life is a great treasure and to threw it all away would be a loss greater than any other.Epifols said:Sure the initial threshold might seem, counterintuitive. But if you think about it, this one time "bad" act will stop an infinite amount of suffering.JoJoDeathunter said:Epifols said:No, your option to save them is disguising. How can you possibly justify the continuation of greed, hate, murder, exploitation, disease, overpopulation, starvation, corruption, and just overall suffering?LuckyClover95 said:I actually can't believe almost 20% of the people who voted would kill everybody else on this planet for the sake of themselves. To me this seems disgusting....
The only humane thing to do is to let them all die, and then live the rest of your life knowing that you solved all of those terrible problems.![]()
I really hope you're joking or trolling, when you consider all of the beauty and love in this world those problems pale, better to live a flawed existence than not at all.
So tell me, is it not cowardice to think yourself too righteous to put the human race out of it's suffering? If it had been done long ago, it would have been a lot easier. Plus, afterwards, no one will be around to mind your decision.