Poll: YOUR political affiliation!

Recommended Videos

paragon1

New member
Dec 8, 2008
1,121
0
0
Akai Shizuku said:
paragon1 said:
Akai Shizuku said:
My avatar, comrade, is the flag of the Japanese Communist Party. As to my particular branch of communism, I'm somewhere on the fence between Marxist-Leninist and what they call anarcho-communist, which is when the state is abolished at the same time as capitalism rather than going through an intermediate stage of socialism. I think both can work, but I feel more comfortable with anarcho-communism because of what Stalin showed us can happen to the socialist phase.
Alright, so I have a question for you. What will keep that anarchy from becoming feudalism? Who will uphold the law wtih no one too enforce it? Or too state it differently, who will protect us from each other? What's too stop the stronger man from taking what he wants, when he wants?
The people's democratic laws will keep society intact. The people will collectively enforce the law which they decide upon. For your last question, I answer again - the people. The masses can be a much stronger force than many people think.
Interesting, so who among the people will stop professional criminals, or prevent foreign invasion (I think that you can agree that such change will not happen everywhere simultaneously, right?)? Will the people still hire professional law enforcement and maintain a military? If so, who would they answer too? Elected officials, perhaps?
 

Akai Shizuku

New member
Jul 24, 2009
3,183
0
0
paragon1 said:
Akai Shizuku said:
paragon1 said:
Akai Shizuku said:
My avatar, comrade, is the flag of the Japanese Communist Party. As to my particular branch of communism, I'm somewhere on the fence between Marxist-Leninist and what they call anarcho-communist, which is when the state is abolished at the same time as capitalism rather than going through an intermediate stage of socialism. I think both can work, but I feel more comfortable with anarcho-communism because of what Stalin showed us can happen to the socialist phase.
Alright, so I have a question for you. What will keep that anarchy from becoming feudalism? Who will uphold the law wtih no one too enforce it? Or too state it differently, who will protect us from each other? What's too stop the stronger man from taking what he wants, when he wants?
The people's democratic laws will keep society intact. The people will collectively enforce the law which they decide upon. For your last question, I answer again - the people. The masses can be a much stronger force than many people think.
Interesting, so who among the people will stop professional criminals, or prevent foreign invasion (I think that you can agree that such change will not happen everywhere simultaneously, right?)? Will the people still hire professional law enforcement and maintain a military? If so, who would they answer too? Elected officials, perhaps?
The people will collectively stop criminals and prevent foreign invasion with the knowledge that failure to do so could result in the gruesome deaths of everyone they love. A standing law enforcement agency or military would not be necessary, but it will be a reality if the people democratically decide upon it. In communism, everything is decided via direct democratic process.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
I would consider myself a libertarian of my own definition, but until we get proportional representation I shall vote repub and ron paul if he runs again.
 

high_castle

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,162
0
0
Interesting mix of opinions floating around. Personally, I'm liberal. I registered Democrat mostly to be able to vote in primaries and other such things, but I consider myself more of an independent. Very liberal on social issues (pro women's choice, pro gay marriage, etc.) but more conservative when it comes to fiscal matters. But that's just me (and because paying your own taxes when you're lower-middle class is tough; you don't get the tax right-offs and you end up footing a lot of the country's bills).
 

AvsJoe

Elite Member
May 28, 2009
9,055
0
41
I guess I'm a liberal, but I'm not far from the center; though I'm not big into politics (yet).
 

paragon1

New member
Dec 8, 2008
1,121
0
0
Akai Shizuku said:
paragon1 said:
Akai Shizuku said:
paragon1 said:
Akai Shizuku said:
My avatar, comrade, is the flag of the Japanese Communist Party. As to my particular branch of communism, I'm somewhere on the fence between Marxist-Leninist and what they call anarcho-communist, which is when the state is abolished at the same time as capitalism rather than going through an intermediate stage of socialism. I think both can work, but I feel more comfortable with anarcho-communism because of what Stalin showed us can happen to the socialist phase.
Alright, so I have a question for you. What will keep that anarchy from becoming feudalism? Who will uphold the law wtih no one too enforce it? Or too state it differently, who will protect us from each other? What's too stop the stronger man from taking what he wants, when he wants?
The people's democratic laws will keep society intact. The people will collectively enforce the law which they decide upon. For your last question, I answer again - the people. The masses can be a much stronger force than many people think.
Interesting, so who among the people will stop professional criminals, or prevent foreign invasion (I think that you can agree that such change will not happen everywhere simultaneously, right?)? Will the people still hire professional law enforcement and maintain a military? If so, who would they answer too? Elected officials, perhaps?
The people will collectively stop criminals and prevent foreign invasion with the knowledge that failure to do so could result in the gruesome deaths of everyone they love. A standing law enforcement agency or military would not be necessary, but it will be a reality if the people democratically decide upon it. In communism, everything is decided via direct democratic process.
Well, that sounds very nice. Unfortunately, it also seems incredibly impractical and unlikely. The reasons being that most sociological studies show that the best interests of the individual and group often conflict. For example, while it might be in the community's best interest for an individual to report the identity of armed robbers, the threat of violence makes it unhealthy for him to do so (the same for anyone who defends him). I wish your vision of society could come true, but the obstacles present in human nature just seem too insurmountable.
 

Combined

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,625
0
0
Start with a base of technocracy and traditional conservatism, add some hate for the Reds, a dash of anti-liberalism, a heap of anti-welfare and a handful of pro-Law.

And you get me, basically. An anti-communist, anti-welfare, anti-liberal Capitalist Conservative with a bit of Technocracy mixed in, who thinks that the Law is the most important thing.
 

Captain Blackout

New member
Feb 17, 2009
1,056
0
0
I'm a Taoist. Dynamic approaches require fluid adaptations and I'm a card carrying member (as much as one can be in this state) of the Pirate Party in order to further my political goals.
 

hotacidbath

New member
Mar 2, 2009
1,046
0
0
Monkeytacoz said:
no political party out there good, so i made up my own called the Shark Party.
I would like to hear more about your party good sir!

As for the original question, I guess I'm a left leaning moderate.
 

jboking

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,694
0
0
Akai Shizuku said:
Hey, you missed Reactionaries in your poll. They should be next to Fascists. It's cool, I doubt there is anyone who is willing to call themselves a reactionary.

As for my political affiliation. I make it my duty not to have one. It forces me to look at each issue instead of just voting one way or the other based on their party, which I know many of my fellow Americans do.