Interesting, so who among the people will stop professional criminals, or prevent foreign invasion (I think that you can agree that such change will not happen everywhere simultaneously, right?)? Will the people still hire professional law enforcement and maintain a military? If so, who would they answer too? Elected officials, perhaps?Akai Shizuku said:The people's democratic laws will keep society intact. The people will collectively enforce the law which they decide upon. For your last question, I answer again - the people. The masses can be a much stronger force than many people think.paragon1 said:Alright, so I have a question for you. What will keep that anarchy from becoming feudalism? Who will uphold the law wtih no one too enforce it? Or too state it differently, who will protect us from each other? What's too stop the stronger man from taking what he wants, when he wants?Akai Shizuku said:My avatar, comrade, is the flag of the Japanese Communist Party. As to my particular branch of communism, I'm somewhere on the fence between Marxist-Leninist and what they call anarcho-communist, which is when the state is abolished at the same time as capitalism rather than going through an intermediate stage of socialism. I think both can work, but I feel more comfortable with anarcho-communism because of what Stalin showed us can happen to the socialist phase.
The people will collectively stop criminals and prevent foreign invasion with the knowledge that failure to do so could result in the gruesome deaths of everyone they love. A standing law enforcement agency or military would not be necessary, but it will be a reality if the people democratically decide upon it. In communism, everything is decided via direct democratic process.paragon1 said:Interesting, so who among the people will stop professional criminals, or prevent foreign invasion (I think that you can agree that such change will not happen everywhere simultaneously, right?)? Will the people still hire professional law enforcement and maintain a military? If so, who would they answer too? Elected officials, perhaps?Akai Shizuku said:The people's democratic laws will keep society intact. The people will collectively enforce the law which they decide upon. For your last question, I answer again - the people. The masses can be a much stronger force than many people think.paragon1 said:Alright, so I have a question for you. What will keep that anarchy from becoming feudalism? Who will uphold the law wtih no one too enforce it? Or too state it differently, who will protect us from each other? What's too stop the stronger man from taking what he wants, when he wants?Akai Shizuku said:My avatar, comrade, is the flag of the Japanese Communist Party. As to my particular branch of communism, I'm somewhere on the fence between Marxist-Leninist and what they call anarcho-communist, which is when the state is abolished at the same time as capitalism rather than going through an intermediate stage of socialism. I think both can work, but I feel more comfortable with anarcho-communism because of what Stalin showed us can happen to the socialist phase.
Its a thumbs up on msnAkai Shizuku said:And what, may I ask, is the (Y) for?scrambledeggs said:Democratic Australia (Y)
Well, that sounds very nice. Unfortunately, it also seems incredibly impractical and unlikely. The reasons being that most sociological studies show that the best interests of the individual and group often conflict. For example, while it might be in the community's best interest for an individual to report the identity of armed robbers, the threat of violence makes it unhealthy for him to do so (the same for anyone who defends him). I wish your vision of society could come true, but the obstacles present in human nature just seem too insurmountable.Akai Shizuku said:The people will collectively stop criminals and prevent foreign invasion with the knowledge that failure to do so could result in the gruesome deaths of everyone they love. A standing law enforcement agency or military would not be necessary, but it will be a reality if the people democratically decide upon it. In communism, everything is decided via direct democratic process.paragon1 said:Interesting, so who among the people will stop professional criminals, or prevent foreign invasion (I think that you can agree that such change will not happen everywhere simultaneously, right?)? Will the people still hire professional law enforcement and maintain a military? If so, who would they answer too? Elected officials, perhaps?Akai Shizuku said:The people's democratic laws will keep society intact. The people will collectively enforce the law which they decide upon. For your last question, I answer again - the people. The masses can be a much stronger force than many people think.paragon1 said:Alright, so I have a question for you. What will keep that anarchy from becoming feudalism? Who will uphold the law wtih no one too enforce it? Or too state it differently, who will protect us from each other? What's too stop the stronger man from taking what he wants, when he wants?Akai Shizuku said:My avatar, comrade, is the flag of the Japanese Communist Party. As to my particular branch of communism, I'm somewhere on the fence between Marxist-Leninist and what they call anarcho-communist, which is when the state is abolished at the same time as capitalism rather than going through an intermediate stage of socialism. I think both can work, but I feel more comfortable with anarcho-communism because of what Stalin showed us can happen to the socialist phase.
I would like to hear more about your party good sir!Monkeytacoz said:no political party out there good, so i made up my own called the Shark Party.
Hey, you missed Reactionaries in your poll. They should be next to Fascists. It's cool, I doubt there is anyone who is willing to call themselves a reactionary.Akai Shizuku said:snip