My god. Commodore 64. YOU HAVE ONE?!?dirk45 said:I'm in for it. Sounds really fun. Oh, all those nice C64 games. So many years ago.
...I was wondering. Then I saw that you are in Aussieland. Sorry for that.Hey Joe said:Yeah, I'll take a crack at this one. Need an excuse to review something which doesn't cost $100.
Not anymore. But I learned programming on a C64 and used it a long time. I also found the perfect game for review. Hint: It's neither PacMan nor Frogger. And I doubt that somebody could write 500 words on Pong.scotth266 said:My god. Commodore 64. YOU HAVE ONE?!?dirk45 said:I'm in for it. Sounds really fun. Oh, all those nice C64 games. So many years ago.
Sadly, I'm afraid to say that not everyone will have access to the video editing software, microphone, and other miscellany required to do this. In light of that, I'm afraid I cannot allow video reviews to be posted in lieu of written ones. (For which I'm sorry, as I would allow it in a perfect world.)Say Anything said:Possibly shooting myself in the foot here, but are we allowed to post a video review, too? I've got my review typed out, but I really think if I added on this video script that I've worked out it will be that much better. I can understand if we don't want to allow it; one, it cheats out that 500-1500 word limit, adding extra time for the reviewer, and two, it's not exactly fair against those who don't have the equipment nor knowledge of how to make a video (though anyone can do it). However, I only see video segments as a plus - if the intent is to improve a review, well, shouldn't it be encouraged?
Either PM or post. Posts are fine, I check this thread regularly.scotth266 said:Ah, just one: who do we give our interest to? I presume you? Or do we just post them?
Very well then. I claim Deja Vu. I will not be kind.NewClassic said:Either PM or post. Posts are fine, I check this thread regularly.scotth266 said:Ah, just one: who do we give our interest to? I presume you? Or do we just post them?
It just occurred to me that I already had you on my list. No worries, all I needed to know is that "I will be participating." So, you're all good.scotth266 said:Very well then. I claim Deja Vu. I will not be kind.NewClassic said:Either PM or post. Posts are fine, I check this thread regularly.scotth266 said:Ah, just one: who do we give our interest to? I presume you? Or do we just post them?
Oh, I thought that you meant we had to submit the interest of our articles by that point. My bad.NewClassic said:It just occurred to me that I already had you on my list. No worries, all I needed to know is that "I will be participating." So, you're all good.scotth266 said:Very well then. I claim Deja Vu. I will not be kind.NewClassic said:Either PM or post. Posts are fine, I check this thread regularly.scotth266 said:Ah, just one: who do we give our interest to? I presume you? Or do we just post them?
Nah, I just lazy on this one and started ranting about zombies.Danzorz said:I see.Hey Joe said:Handed in my review already because I have a heavy expected workload. It won't win, but I had fun in the 10 minutes I spent writing it.
Hmm.
Will it be as mind blowing as the Sims one?