exactly no drama as resulted in an explosion like this, yet according to you, lupa making some posts on a blog caused immediate action from CA. not lupa made a post, spoony continued to make the scene public in his charlie sheen style rants resulting in him leaving for that scene, that would have validity, your claiming CA responded directly to something lupa said which alone got him suspended, then more comments from lupa got him fired. your version places 100% of the blame on lupa and absolves spoony, and has some one who watched spoony's tweets as they happened he is not blameless, perhaps not 100% to blame but depression or not he didn't handle the thing at all maturely or professionally. (and I say this as some one with depression on medication for it, as are many of my friends.TheDrunkNinja said:Heh, this is Public Relations damage control. This isn't stooping low at all.venatus said:there's been drama between contributors that never prompted executive action, and yes PR statements leave a lot of wiggle room, but frankly the level of manipulation your talking about is ridiculous, if they said not responsible then maybe, but saying she was in now way involved no, that moves it from careful PR to blatant lying, which I have no reason to believe they stooped that low.TheDrunkNinja said:I did. And I bet they're right. Lupa never complained. To the executives at Channel Awesome. She probably never asked the people at Channel Awesome to fire or do anything about Noah.
Instead, she wrote an multiparagraphed essay on why Spoony is a horrible person for saying a rape joke to one of his coworkers. A month after he already apologized.
See? No direct complaining for Noah's termination.
Also, never has any contributor drama ended in such an explosion. I think Noah's averaged a 50 tweets per day record by now. It's really quite sad.