There are now 649 Pokemon.

Recommended Videos

Denamic

New member
Aug 19, 2009
3,804
0
0
Only 3 or 4 more generations, and we'll have 1000 of the little bastards.
Soon, the catchphrase will be more like "Gotta catch approximately 25% of them!"
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
Korolev said:
Now that's a lot of pokemon. Having said that, I would rather they expanded the move-set and the capabilities of existing pokemon. I know that pokemon can be considered "deep" by many players who do things like min/maxing and stat analysis and EV values and all that stuff, but instead of just making MORE pokemon, couldn't they instead focus their efforts at making the world a bit deeper?
I agree to a certain extent. Instead of making 200 new Pokemon, 90% of which will be useless, why not focus on improving some of the underused pokemon, such as Raichu, most of the Bug pokemon, or some others from Generations 1-3? Surely it'd be better design for every pokemon to at least be decent, instead of the way it is today where you have ~30-40 very powerful Pokemon like Starmie and Garchomp, and then 450 either marginal or downright bad pokemon that never see any real use.

Then expand the movesets a little bit. No need to do too much in this area, since there's already a hell of a lot in the game, but some pokemon that have extremely good stats just don't have the movepool to be viable. Moltres was a great example before this last generation.

Finally, perhaps make the EV/nature system a little more transparent and easier to understand. For people who take the game seriously, it's not that difficult, but no one would argue that it isn't clunky and unintuitive. I'd like a better way to EV train my pokemon other than fighting 500 Gyarados in a row.
 

sky14kemea

Deus Ex-Mod
Jun 26, 2008
12,760
0
0
Simalacrum said:
Oh dear, I remember when I used to know all 181 Pokemon, both in Japanese AND English...

...I feel old now XD
I used to know the first 150 pokemon by heart AND in order of the handbook. Dx

I have no idea about any of these new pokemon :/ Half the reason I stopped playing was because they just kept making more silly pokemon for me to remember. My brain can't take all those strange names!! *runs away*
 

Hollock

New member
Jun 26, 2009
3,282
0
0
I love it, I thought I wouldn't (didn't really like black and whites designs) but I did XD
 

teutonicman

New member
Mar 30, 2009
2,565
0
0
I am pleasantly surprised. The average of pokemon I think look cool is about the same for this generation (barring starters obviously).
 

Marik2

Phone Poster
Nov 10, 2009
5,462
0
0
As many people here have said there are some good ones (like the sea turtles) but most of them dont really look like pokemon they look like digimon now...

Im not blinded by nostalgia Im just posting what I think honestly, and besides I stopped playing pokemon by the 3rd gen cuz I realized they woulnt stop making new pokemon and I would never catch them all :(

So Im just moving on to pimpemon now :p
 

timeadept

New member
Nov 23, 2009
413
0
0
i was thinking about a way to do something like that a bit back, it'd make a lot of moves more useful too. If you made the speed stat a bigger part of the game... imagine poke'mon have a speed bar that fills at a speed proportional to their speed stat, like the rogue in wow or if you've played crono trigger a lot more like that. Then each individual move uses up a cretin amount of speed. The lighter less powerful attacks would use less speed, like fury swipes, and the stronger attacks would use more speed, like fire blast or hyper beam.I think a change like this could add a lot to the game, though it would require you to go back through all the moves and assign a speed value.

*EDIT* actually the system would most accurately be explained as a hybrid rogue energy/crono trigger system.

**EDIT** forgot to quote the guy, not sure how to add it but he was talking about adding more depth to poke'mon and or making the old ones actually decent instead of having 30 or 40 powerhouses.

***EDIT***
MetallicaRulez0 said:
Korolev said:
Now that's a lot of pokemon. Having said that, I would rather they expanded the move-set and the capabilities of existing pokemon. I know that pokemon can be considered "deep" by many players who do things like min/maxing and stat analysis and EV values and all that stuff, but instead of just making MORE pokemon, couldn't they instead focus their efforts at making the world a bit deeper?
I agree to a certain extent. Instead of making 200 new Pokemon, 90% of which will be useless, why not focus on improving some of the underused pokemon, such as Raichu, most of the Bug pokemon, or some others from Generations 1-3? Surely it'd be better design for every pokemon to at least be decent, instead of the way it is today where you have ~30-40 very powerful Pokemon like Starmie and Garchomp, and then 450 either marginal or downright bad pokemon that never see any real use.

Then expand the movesets a little bit. No need to do too much in this area, since there's already a hell of a lot in the game, but some pokemon that have extremely good stats just don't have the movepool to be viable. Moltres was a great example before this last generation.

Finally, perhaps make the EV/nature system a little more transparent and easier to understand. For people who take the game seriously, it's not that difficult, but no one would argue that it isn't clunky and unintuitive. I'd like a better way to EV train my pokemon other than fighting 500 Gyarados in a row.
there we go, i'm happy now

****EDIT**** you know what? lets just use the guild wars energy system and call it a day.
ok... NOW i'm happy... :)
 

Finbark

New member
Jul 24, 2008
223
0
0
Gear, the gear Pokemon. Its evolutions include Gigear and Gigigear.
I have to say I'm a bit disappointed, probably wont be buying this like I had planned.
 

Death God

New member
Jul 6, 2010
1,754
0
0
I am a pokemon-lover ever since red and black but I must say.... they are starting to kinda go overboard finally. Don't get me wrong, I like a couple but some are just pushing the pokemon boundaries.
 

charlest92

New member
Sep 4, 2010
78
0
0
Are we sure that these aren't Digimon? Because they look remarkably like Digimon and are named like Yu-gi-oh monsters, and that one thing does look like a fetus. Pokemon as a game series and a tv series died after they left the second region.
 

dex-dex

New member
Oct 20, 2009
2,531
0
0
Peabob said:
I stopped keeping track of pokemon after the first 150. Pokemon Red and Blue 4evr!!
FTW!!!
also i believe that too. any kid that tell me otherwise get a punch in the face!
 

Mr.Mudkip

New member
Nov 16, 2009
11,009
0
0
Well....fuck. Looks like my 280 collected Pokemon just became a whole lot less significant. *sighs, then returns to trying to catch them all.*
 

enlargedhousecat

New member
May 12, 2008
26
0
0
I love-em all(even if I won't catch 'em all) I stilldon't know why they didn't just go all the way and make it 650 but oh well