Ultratwinkie said:
1st child dying = That was a side effect of a chain of events starting with the 1st plague. The uppermost layers of grain were infected with a disease (forgot the name) harmless to adults in small doses, and in Egyptian custom the 1st born and the best livestock get twice the amount of food than everyone else. They get the "best" grain which was on the top. The double dose of disease proved too much for the under developed immune system of the children and the immunity of the animals and they died. Proven by science. If the granaries were better protected from outside elements and disease it would have never have happened.
Sorry man, I'm a bit late into the debate, but are you arguing that the Exodus story actually occurred? You seem to be using science so I assume you're not going for a complete Biblical interpretation. If so, I'm just wondering how that's possible when there's no evidence to support the argument that the Jews were enslaved in Egypt during any of the time that they lived there in large numbers after the Kingdom of Judah was destroyed in 597 B.C.E. There's also no evidence of a mass migration of Jews later on, in both Egypt and within the Sinai area. Also, the Egyptians have no account of the event in their history, nor do they have any account of the first born sons dying. Even some of the earliest Jewish documents we've found negate the exodus story, it only emerges hundreds of years after the Jews re-established themselves in Canaan. In fact, the exodus story is probably just a Jewish adaptation of a similar Egyptian story that predates it about a man named Sinuhe, who had a very similar history to that of Moses. I'm just saying that your science may hold weight, but the history disagrees, and thus the event should be taken as fiction.
Now, in a fictional context, God does specifically target the innocent first sons of Egypt, a morally questionable thing to do. But then again, most of the Old Testament has God acting in very questionable ways, including arguing for the genocide of certain ethnic groups, such as the Canaanites. He even says to kill the women, children and even the animals in Deuteronomy (I believe it's Deuteronomy, not entirely sure because I haven't read my Bible in a couple months. Yes, I'm an atheist who reads the Bible, I like to be informed).
Bebopcola2021 said:
At the time I'm posting this, they're doing maintenance on the site, but when this comes back up, seems like the Timothy Plan is to videogames what this site is to movies. Enough craziness in this site to kill an afternoon.
http://www.capalert.com/capreports/
Thank you for that, their Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas article is hilarious, if Hunter S. Thompson wasn't ash scattered across a field he'd probably rise from the grave just to fuck with these people.
"If one were to take all the pages of the Bible which present any guidance on personal behavior and tape them to a large wall then throw a couple hundred darts at them, it is likely each dart would point to a Chapter/Verse which has applicability to the behaviors in this movie. Except murder and suicide. There were no murders or suicide noted in it. Foul and vulgar language thundered at about 72 per hour, more than once per minute with God's name in vain at an identical rate, mostly with the four letter expletive. Use of the most foul of the foul words outnumbered the use of the rest of the three/four letter word vocabulary nearly four to one. Illegal drugs formed the quintessential presence in this movie with more than 88 examples per hour of illegal drug possession or use, consumption of them, offering of them or coercion with them, or intoxication with and hallucinations from them."
Damn, they're making that sound like its a bad thing haha.