Top 5 Rifles Ever Made

Recommended Videos

UltraParanoia

New member
Oct 11, 2009
697
0
0
Armitage Shanks said:
UltraParanoia said:
I am confused about the large number of military rifles in this thread, do none of you hunt?
The only rifle I've fired is the F88 Austeyr. So it'd probably be the only one on my list. Which yeah, makes me look like a military fanboy quoting stuff I read on the internet; but when I used it I found it to be very comfortable, extremely lightweight (especially compared with the Vietnam-era SLRs that I handled but never fired), very low on recoil and easy enough to use that first time shooting it (or anything for that matter) I got 20 rounds within 130mm grouping.

Of course, I have no personal experience firing other rifles, so for all I know they could all be this good.
Best thing to do is to go and get the experience, recreational shooting never stops being fun.
 

RanD00M

New member
Oct 26, 2008
6,947
0
0
the mechsican said:
No shit. When I was in Iraq, some infantry guys had pulled out a bunch of AK's that had been buried under a bunch of dirt for over 20 years. All they did was hose them down, spray some WD-40 on them and fired a magazine (not a "clip) through them. Out of 200 AK's that had been pulled from the dirt, only 3 of them would not fire.
Well twist my nipples and call me your grnadpa.That is reliable.
 

Yudas

New member
Apr 30, 2009
238
0
0
1. Thing that goes boom!
2. Thing that goes bang!
3. Thing that goes crack!
4. Thing that goes clock!
5. Thing that goes puff!

... I know nothing about guns.

The AK-47 does sound amazing though if such a word can be used for a killing tool.
 

The Cheezy One

Christian. Take that from me.
Dec 13, 2008
1,912
0
0
L3m0n_L1m3 said:
shotgunbob said:
5. STG-44
Advanced for its time, the worlds first Assualt Rifle, but saw very little production because of Hitlers dislike of the look of the gun
Really? I could've sworn he really liked that gun. Huh, guess I do learn something new every day.

OT: M16, AK47, Bushmaster ACR, XM8, and the SCAR-H
I thought it was the FG42 he didnt like
it was ugly as hell like, but given to the fallshirmjager elites. well it would have been, if theyd made enough.
OT:
L85R (britain!)
M4 Carbine (accurate and fast-firing)
SMLE short magazine lee enfield (best BA rifle of WW2)
Karabina 98 (second best)
BAR browning assault rifle (i just like it, although it was too heavy, inaccurate and didnt have the rate of fire with only a 20 round magazine)
 

Vern

New member
Sep 19, 2008
1,302
0
0
Not in a certain order, but if we're talking military rifles:

FN-FAL
Sako M90
SCAR
Mosin-Nagant (Although the bolt design is supposedly more complicated than an M/K 98 I've always found it easier to operate and disassemble, and I've found it to be more accurate than a Mauser)
SKS-45, I've always loved them. They were a precursor to the AK-47 sure, but they are more accurate and have a higher muzzle velocity than the AK-47. They also tend to jam less. Throw a reliable 20 round mag in them, and it's better than an AK.
 

Vanguard_Ex

New member
Mar 19, 2008
4,687
0
0
UltraParanoia said:
3. 10/22. Not joking in the least, best small caliber rifle ever built.
http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/ruger-10-22-usst.jpg

That's one, right? It looks like something from Borderlands.
 

the mechsican

New member
Nov 2, 2009
12
0
0
Ishnuvalok said:
1: The L85A2, the best NATO rifle around, and the best assault rifle today. Extremely accurate, compact without sacrificing barrel length, extremely reliable. And gotta love the SUSAT sight too.

2: The Velmet RK95, fuck your shitty Ak47. This is where it's at, the same durability, reliability of an AK with the accuracy and precision of a NATO rifle.

3: The FN FAL. Really? Need I explain?

4: Automat Karbin 5, the AK5. An FN FNC variant made for the Swedish Army. Basically an FN FNC made even more reliable and durable, and fixed it up ergonomically so you can comfortably use it with winter gloves. It's accurate and reliable, although it's a little heavy.

5: The M16A4, I don't like it much, but still, it's a pretty damn good rifle. Accurate, reliable (keep it clean, people who don't clean their rifles = morons) and light weight.

Why isn't the AK47 here? Because it's a piece of shit. Sure, it's a piece of shit that works no matter what you do to it, but you can't hit the side of a barn with that thing. Sure it's very symbolic and it's used in all resistance movements/guerrilla fighters, but you know why? Because the gun is so simple a child can figure out how it works.
The L85 is a piece of shit whose engineers hired H&K to fix their shitty design to make it mediocre at best. I've fired it and it is a piece of crap.

The Valmet is just an accurized AK. It is nothing new. Galil will do the same shit for alot cheaper.

Yes please explain about the FAL. It is obviously a capable rifle which has the 3rd highest production after the AK and M-16. It has been dubbed the Right Arm of The Free World and is used by real men, not armchair commandos.

Haha! The FNC, the one that failed to sell and was cancelled in favor of a better design? I would have respected you a little more had you said the SIG 550 or the StG90.

You are pretty much dead on with the M-16 and any models A2 and above.

You can hit the side of a barn with an AK if you put it on SEMI and not AUTO. AUTO is a waste of ammo. Real men use SEMI in combat. Gamers and illiterate conscripts use AUTO in combat and end up dead from those who fired back in SEMI.
 

UltraParanoia

New member
Oct 11, 2009
697
0
0
Vanguard_Ex yeah that's a 10/22, they take to modification real well.
These are all 10/22s
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v329/Muzzleblast/TommyDrum11.jpg
http://www.themartialist.com/images/tac2207.jpg
http://gunbucket.com/gunblog/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/main_image.jpg
http://vpcblog.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/10-22gatling.jpg

It's part of the reason they are so awesome.
 

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,292
0
0
the mechsican said:
No shit. When I was in Iraq, some infantry guys had pulled out a bunch of AK's that had been buried under a bunch of dirt for over 20 years. All they did was hose them down, spray some WD-40 on them and fired a magazine (not a "clip) through them. Out of 200 AK's that had been pulled from the dirt, only 3 of them would not fire.
I think that's more a statement about how awesome WD-40 is, which it is.
 

malestrithe

New member
Aug 18, 2008
1,818
0
0
Frank_Sinatra_ said:
Kubanator said:
I'm not a real gun buff, but AK47 is an ideal gun from a strategic perspective. Cheap,
If you find $1000 [http://www.impactguns.com/store/arsenal.html] cheap, then yes.
Kubanator said:
simple, reliable, and common.
Simplicity comes at an accuracy and staying on target cost.
Reliable in some respects but you still need to be careful with the damn thing.
Where are you shopping for your Ak-47? I found a site that sells them for less than 300.
 

the mechsican

New member
Nov 2, 2009
12
0
0
Vern said:
Mosin-Nagant (Although the bolt design is supposedly more complicated than an M/K 98 I've always found it easier to operate and disassemble, and I've found it to be more accurate than a Mauser)
The Mosin is more simple than the Mausers and fires the sheer awesomeness of the 7.62x54R.
 

slopeslider

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2009
573
0
21
RAND00M said:
IdealistCommi said:
And "reliable" is nothing to what a Ak47 can take. I've seen them dunked in water, sand, mud, beat with a hammer, then still fire off a clip.
I saw one that was filled with sand.Then thrown in water.Then driven over.And it still fired off a clipMAG.
CLIPS are what the m1 garand and Lee Enfield use. (They actually CLIP them together)
MAGS are box-type things that hold bullets over a spring that pushes them up thru the top.
Never again.
 

Rahnzan

New member
Oct 13, 2008
350
0
0
What I see in this thread is a lot fanboyism over guns 50 years and older from a lot of people who dont really know guns because they're not providing any real meat to the meal.

The AR series is garbage. Trial and error shouldn't be the exclusive method of improving a gun intented for defending air force bases in field conditions worse than slightly excessive wind speeds made by a company that got to produce them en mass because they were the lowest bidder. Not everything from Germany is gold, most of it is overpriced and overhyped. Quality engineering is nothing more than a stereotype and good marketing. HK doesn't make crap, but they dont always make gold either. (FAL > G3) The AK series - There's a reason you can get 50 62-year-old guns for 6 dollars in most parts of the uncivilized world, just saying. That and it's a 62 year old gun. We dont have anything better yet? I'm calling bull****.

First you people need to get some standard definition of what would equate to the bestust rifflez evarz.

I propose:
1) Most Reliability (How often it breaks. Materials used. Will this thing rust on me?)
2) Highest Accuracy
3) Longest Effective Range
4) Greatest Stopping Power (Amount of kinetic force transfered to target)
5) Ease of Use (Recoil, Repair, Trigger safety and other functions, guns do more than shoot.)
6) Features (case ejector position, closed/open bolt, etc.)
7) Ergonomics (Feel, adjustable stock, grip, etc.)
8) Available Accessories (Bipods, Grenade Launchers)
9) Anything else that isn't "This gun was used by country X in war Y because company Z got the lowest bid and is real popular." N'Sync was popular, Spice Girls were popular, they both suck. I dont care where it came from or who used it, only how it performs.

Not really my thread but thats a proposal for getting this thread to be something other than a carbon copy of at least...a zillion others. Search button you know?
 

Vern

New member
Sep 19, 2008
1,302
0
0
the mechsican said:
Vern said:
Mosin-Nagant (Although the bolt design is supposedly more complicated than an M/K 98 I've always found it easier to operate and disassemble, and I've found it to be more accurate than a Mauser)
The Mosin is more simple than the Mausers and fires the sheer awesomeness of the 7.62x54R.
From what I've heard it's generally accepted that the Mosin bolt body is more complicated because it has three main pieces as opposed to the two main pieces of the Mauser. However, having owned both, I've never got my Mosin bolt cocked incorrectly during assembly that I needed to use a screw driver to reassemble and gouge a chunk of flesh out of my hand. The safety on a Mauser cocks the whole process up. And yes, the 7.62x54R is an amazing round, one of my favorites. Still amazing that a rifle and round designed over 100 years ago can still put rounds dead center reliably.
 

WolfThomas

Man must have a code.
Dec 21, 2007
5,292
0
0
This thread really needs to be renamed Top Five Assault rifles ever made. We've had rifles for over 200 hundreds and they come in every shape and size. Their uses range from war to sporting to hunting.

I think an important thing is to compare the rifle to what was around at the time, in that vein an AK47 was pretty revolutionary, and as I mentioned earlier the Ferguson rifle was ridiculously awesome for the time.

So sure a SCAR or something may be be accurate and reliable, but it's still just a great weapons in a market of good weapons.

Now with a Ferguson rifle against men with muskets, you'd be firing four times faster (while being able to lie prone) and four times further that's an insane advantage.