Actually, thats the people.yaik7a said:
The US government CANNOT kill its own civilians. Only a criminal's fellow peers can.
US(and a bunch of other places) vs Libya, GO!
- Thread starter SovietSecrets
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The US government CANNOT kill its own civilians. Only a criminal's fellow peers can.
"We will crush the US! We will crush the UN! We will crush all those who go against us!!!" Says Kahdafi red with target reticule from every gun from every army against Libya.
But I'm one to give credit where its due. At least he's optimistic at times of hopelessness with 0% chance of victory.
But I'm one to give credit where its due. At least he's optimistic at times of hopelessness with 0% chance of victory.
The holocaust wasn't all civilians. Yes, they were the majority, the Nazis also killed just about ANYONE who opposed them, or were related to those who opposed them...yaik7a said:
And just because there are isolated cases of people wanting to overthrow a government for their own personal and corrupt interests doesn't mean every rebellion is that way.
Everybody seems to forget that the war in Iraq is over, been over since August of last year when all US combat personnel were withdrew from the country, so technically there is only one war, (war in Afghanistan) a country with with significant U.S presence that just happens to be in a sensitive area of the world, and a no fly zone so only 1 warUndead Dragon King said:
Why does everyone keep comparing this to Somalia anyways, no one seems to remember the no fly zone over Bosnia in 1993 through 1995 which in my opinion was rather successful leading to the Dayton Accords and today Bosnia is successful and somewhat modern country
Well, we've all ready demonstrated how well informed your opinions are.yaik7a said:
So hereby dub thee troll.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! You BELIEVE that?Heeman89 said:
It's bullshit, by the way.
This is just like a reunion tour for the allies! (But we can pretend like austrailia was the bandmate that died... Well becuase... they aren't there)
Then perhaps you shouldn't make bold claims on the moral structure of the United States, seeing as you know nothing.yaik7a said:
If you looked at the BBC news twitter when this all started you saw things like' My Brother's were picketing in the square and soldiers came with grenade launchers and it was a bloodbath'
Yeah damn those violent terrorists uprisers >_> /sarcasm
Yeah damn those violent terrorists uprisers >_> /sarcasm
Yeah sounds like a plan. After all, us swedes are already accepting all the refugees from the middle east, might as well start on africa while we're at it.
besides, everyone can see that the world (especially USA) needs another war with a muslim country with large quantities of oil.
besides, everyone can see that the world (especially USA) needs another war with a muslim country with large quantities of oil.
Jesus can't we stop killing each other? Oh yeah oil I forgot. Next up is North Korea I am calling it right now. There's been tension since the Korean Wars.
North Korea has nothing of 'value' sat in large refineries in it.Souplex said:
What it does have is the Chinese to the North and more Koreans sat on the largest collection of American military hardware outside of the US to the south.
It's a bit more delicate than attacking the forces of a man that nobody else likes who is in open civil war and who the British and American militaries have been itching to get some revenge on for two and a bit decades.
But I know what you mean. It's hard to justify letting Kim Jong starve his people into the stone age when a measly three week civil war gets the full attention of the UN war machine.
PS, the French are involved, that is a big deal, they're very, very good at bombing stuff.
China wont stand for foreign powers on NK soil.ServebotFrank said:
It has nothing to do with oil, or any other nonsense. Its the same reason why we didn't squash NK way back when: Over Chine's radioactive, glassed corpse.