Where've you been for the last year or so?l Ancient l said:halo already endedrads are your friend said:halo
Where've you been for the last year or so?l Ancient l said:halo already endedrads are your friend said:halo
Maybe you don't like it but many other people like the series. IV was a dissapointment yes but II and III are very good games.harhol said:Soul Calibur. It's never been good; it never will be.
Maybe all FF games take place in the same universe but not on the same planet. But maybe I missunderstood your post and you where talking about FF X and FF X-2.Slaashyish said:I'm going to have to agree with the sonic games and the final fantasy series. I only played FFX, and FFX-2 which were enjoyable enough, but I'm just annoyed at the fact that most of the games (except X and X-2 which they messed up their own numbering system with) aren't even sequential in ANY WAY AT ALL!!! Apparently they're all set in the same world, but at different times in it's history, to which I feel I must put the question; "how many times can one planet be under threat by some kind of world destroying disaster?"
.......Vlane said:I kinda mentioned the Wii xxx titles.
Well, it's obvious that X and X-2 are on the same planet, I was talking about all of them. It's nothing I have proof of though, it's just a theory I've heard. Probably should have made that clearer. There are a few connection features between the cames, other than the names of the summoned creatures (or airships in 12). Part of the theory is that the ShinRa company in VII was started by the little AlBhed kid in X-2, which would mean that X came before VII, which is irritatingly complicated, and leads me to believe that it is most likely that: A- my firend is grasping at straws because B- the guys who make the games can't be bothered to think of new names for everything each time.Vlane said:Maybe all FF games take place in the same universe but not on the same planet. But maybe I missunderstood your post and you where talking about FF X and FF X-2.Slaashyish said:I'm going to have to agree with the sonic games and the final fantasy series. I only played FFX, and FFX-2 which were enjoyable enough, but I'm just annoyed at the fact that most of the games (except X and X-2 which they messed up their own numbering system with) aren't even sequential in ANY WAY AT ALL!!! Apparently they're all set in the same world, but at different times in it's history, to which I feel I must put the question; "how many times can one planet be under threat by some kind of world destroying disaster?"
But... its got boobiesBallPtPenTheif said:Tomb Raider
I never liked the games, they were always littered with sloppy programming and filled with shitty bland art design and awkwardly animated control schemes.
They did make a second conquer and tom clancy games are almost all good.WINDOWCLEAN2 said:Ned for speed, tomb raider, MGS, Worls of takes over your life and sucks ut your soul craft,
Call of Duty (its gone downhill since 2),Command & Conquer, Splinter Cell, other games i cant think of at da moment.
on the reverse they should bring back Conker
I wouldn't say that. Forza Motorsport 2 was an awesome game. And I did love Gran Turismo 3: A-Spec back in the day. But yes, the majority of racers are s**t. I got alotta other series I'd love to kill, but I don't have the time to name all of them.rads are your friend said:every racer ever made
Damn, I was about to say pokémonLeeHarveyO said:Pokemon! They gotta run out of colors and gems eventually.