What about the farm bill? We're wasting money making third world countries poorer. I know there are much worse things but it's something that we could easily change. That and illegal cannabis.
Yes, it could be seen that way, and for those wishing to turn a blind eye from previous events then yes, it could be considered White paint. Though earlier, McKinley, the president before Roosevelt was responible for the aquistion of the Phillipines, and the other territores aquired from the Spanish-American War. This president was issued the "White Man's Burden" esentially meaning he had the Go-ahead to "Civilize" the "Savage" tribes of the islands, and along with that China, Japan, and the Native Americans. This ideal of "Helping our Little Brown Brother" was passed down to the Progressive Teddy Roosevelt, though he was no were near as racist as McKinley, who prayed to God, and came upon a decision to "Civilize, Capitalize, and Christanize, our little Brown Brothers".avidabey said:That's...That's wrong. So wrong...This-is-Hip-Hop said:Well, yes, it was great for Japenese Relations, and was part of Teddy Roosevelts "Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick" plan, though the act of doing this, gave the United States more reason to promote racisim, hance the "White" in the "White Fleet". Though, this is not truly 100% bad thing, hence my lack of mentioning it as the worst presidental mistake. But, the past is the past, we are not as racist now. Though I have to agree with you, Grant's mistake was pretty drastic, and is the sole reason why he was the worst President ever, probably even worse then Bush.
-This-is-Hip-Hop
It was given the name of Great White Fleet after it had circumnavigated the world, and it was called that because the ships were white. Not racism - the color of the ships.
The entire thing implies that Canada invaded the US,which isn't true. Only Britain has ever done so. Washington was burned by an invading force that landed in the Chesapeake Bay and marched to the capital.Acaroid said:Upper and Lower Canada appeared on the Map in 1792, so you could say that Canadians in red coats, burnt the White House. The Constitutional Act came into effect on December 26, 1791. Canada was still a British Colony and truly self ruled country however. But then again saying that they didn't burn down the white house would be like saying Americans didn't fight for their independance, using that thinking i guess the french were the only nation fighting for US independance.Zetona said:It was the Brits, not the Canadians. Canada wasn't even independent until 1867 at earliest. I don't know why, but as an American, this irks me.Acaroid said:Letting the Canadians burn down your capital, face it you will never let it down XD
So I guess we can consider anything that happened in the U.S. before the declaration of Independance is actually British history, and not U.S. history?
That's what I call: being between a rock and a hard dick.Irridium said:I would have to say the Iraq War
"They have weapons of mass destruction!" Bush say
3 yeares later:
"My bad" Bush says again.
Now, if the U.S. leaves they look like pussies for leaving and not helping people, but if the U.S. stays they get ridiculed for being where they don't belong.
Roosevelt inherited a revolution in the Philippines, and being an imperialist like McKinley, he decided to quash it and give the Filipinos their independence when he felt they were ready. His White Fleet, though, was a foreign policy gesture. It created admiration and respect for America around the globe, especially in Japan, which had recently had a flap with the US over discriminatory schooling in San Francisco. (TR resolved that little quarrel with secret meetings). I don't think the White Fleet's main aim was to promote racism; it was to promote US standing and gain some influence. After all, those were imperialistic times.This-is-Hip-Hop said:Yes, it could be seen that way, and for those wishing to turn a blind eye from previous events then yes, it could be considered White paint. Though earlier, McKinley, the president before Roosevelt was responible for the aquistion of the Phillipines, and the other territores aquired from the Spanish-American War. This president was issued the "White Man's Burden" esentially meaning he had the Go-ahead to "Civilize" the "Savage" tribes of the islands, and along with that China, Japan, and the Native Americans. This ideal of "Helping our Little Brown Brother" was passed down to the Progressive Teddy Roosevelt, though he was no were near as racist as McKinley, who prayed to God, and came upon a decision to "Civilize, Capitalize, and Christanize, our little Brown Brothmindset of "help those ers".avidabey said:That's...That's wrong. So wrong...This-is-Hip-Hop said:Well, yes, it was great for Japenese Relations, and was part of Teddy Roosevelts "Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick" plan, though the act of doing this, gave the United States more reason to promote racisim, hance the "White" in the "White Fleet". Though, this is not truly 100% bad thing, hence my lack of mentioning it as the worst presidental mistake. But, the past is the past, we are not as racist now. Though I have to agree with you, Grant's mistake was pretty drastic, and is the sole reason why he was the worst President ever, probably even worse then Bush.
-This-is-Hip-Hop
It was given the name of Great White Fleet after it had circumnavigated the world, and it was called that because the ships were white. Not racism - the color of the ships.
Though Teddy Roosevelt still had the progressive less fortunate", even if those less fortunate would be better off without us.
-This-is-Hip-Hop
Why do US screw-ups always seem to cause expensive, interminable wars?Hunde Des Krieg said:That's what I call: being between a rock and a hard dick.Irridium said:I would have to say the Iraq War
"They have weapons of mass destruction!" Bush say
3 yeares later:
"We can't leave yet because everything will be wonderful if we stay" Bush says again.
Now, if the U.S. leaves they look like pussies for leaving and not helping people, but if the U.S. stays they get ridiculed for being where they don't belong.
Your asking me? Because when you screw up internationally it leads to bad bad things.Zetona said:Why do US screw-ups always seem to cause expensive, interminable wars?Hunde Des Krieg said:That's what I call: being between a rock and a hard dick.Irridium said:I would have to say the Iraq War
"They have weapons of mass destruction!" Bush say
3 yeares later:
"We can't leave yet because everything will be wonderful if we stay" Bush says again.
Now, if the U.S. leaves they look like pussies for leaving and not helping people, but if the U.S. stays they get ridiculed for being where they don't belong.
>_< shut up you socialist weasel s***mop. of course socialism would work if perfectly implemented, just like utopia would work perfectly if we just got it right. QUIT BITCHING and act. Your computer would be better used for helping some kid in Africa learn to read, so in a socialist world we would redistribute it to them, or maybe to a university where people actually use it to learn instead of just s*** crap out of their mouths.Gooble said:Preaching freedom, liberty and justice on every possible occasion, yet practicing corruption, racism, sexism, torture, illegal wars, greed, a class system etc. etc. etc. right across the country.
Also being so terribly afraid of socialism, despite the fact that if it were properly put into practice it would reflect the aforementioned virtues of freedom, liberty, justice etc.
stuck between a rock and a hard place.Irridium said:I would have to say the Iraq War
"They have weapons of mass destruction!" Bush say
3 yeares later:
"My bad" Bush says again.
Now, if the U.S. leaves they look like pussies for leaving and not helping people, but if the U.S. stays they get ridiculed for being where they don't belong.