Madara XIII said:
X10J said:
Madara XIII said:
Palademon said:
It is all caused by mankind's most dangerous creation and weapon; opinion.
That's Bullshit and you know it Jonny! Everyone knows it's religion! God why do you have to be so stupid!?! It's people like you who think everyone's opinion is bullshit, but your own!!
[HEADING=1]/Sarcasm[/HEADING]
Hehehe just messin' with ya Jonny Boy.
[The said:
Rock]
What do you guys think about all of this?
But @OP ya see how easy it is to become hostile just off of one opinion? Christ it's like the internet was filled with alot of philosophers (Bull-shitters) who have too much time on their hands and would rather lash out at other people for not thinking the same as they do.
Still though, I can always count on the Escapist (8/10 times) to be a place of rationality and less infuriating posts.
But, I'm a philosopher. What's wrong with philosophy?
OT: I typically try to use the internet to be representative of myself in real life, as I imagine most people do. As far as why there's more conflict on the internet, I think it's mostly because there are more people on the internet. I mean in real life there's a decent chance that you won't run into someone who thinks differently than you on most topics in your group of family and friends. On the internet, however, there are so many more people, all talking and sharing their opinions and beliefs, some of them are bound to differ. The real problem, I think, is that people don't realy know how to respond reasonably to differing ideas, or want to respond reasonably in some cases. In realities both virtual and proper. Which isn't realy surprizing, having one's beliefs challenged can be quite the difficult thing for some people.
Nothing really, I like the subject myself, but I said it's like having a gathering of numerous philosophers in one place. In other words a huge clash of values, beliefs, opinions, theories and views that may not end well a good majority of the time.
I love philosophy however at times it tends to dance around questions I rather have answered directly.
So yeah my clash between philosophy and science raves on
Quite right, but I think an ideal philosopher (or, in my opinion, a proper philosopher) would be open to opposing ideas and would be able to settle, or even simply encounter, differing opinions reasonably and peacefully. Basically, I think that a mass congregation of philosophers is not an accurate image (assuming my idea of a proper philosopher holds true) of the clashes of opinion on the internet. In fact, I think that a lack of practised philosophy is partially responsible for the kind of hostility seen on the internet.
As for your battle between philosophy and science, might I add this little bit of philosophy from Bertrand Russell:
"It is true that this is partly accounted for by the fact that, as soon as definite knowledge concerning any subject becomes possible, this subject ceases to be called philosophy, and becomes a separate science."
And, if you're especially fond of philosophy, this bigger bit of philosophy: http://skepdic.com/russell.html