bagodix said:
I had no idea consoletard is now officially defined somewhere. Both 'consoletard and 'console tard' return less than 10K hits on Google, and there doesn't appear to be any definition anywhere. Urban Dictionary is not familiar with either term. Even if some guy somewhere had his own definition for it, it wouldn't make it official.
So why the fuck are you trying to impose somebody else's definition of a word on me, or acting like his usage of the word has anything to do with my usage of the word? Don't come crying to me because someone else said something you didn't like.
Every time it seems to be used it seems to be directed at all console gamers. I'm not coming and crying to you, though. If you don't remember, you started coming to me about how you believe the term is justified for individuals, I replied that it is used to describe every console gamer gamer. That's the definition that seems to be most commonly used and so when you say something such 'stupid console-tards' it comes across as referring to all console gamers rather than just a select few.
You're the one who started whining about the definition, and then you started acting like I had called all console gamers consoletards just because someone else had, as if I was somehow responsible for what he had said.
Are you sure? I made the first post in this argument, you responded. I didn't say that you called all console gamers console-tards, just that the use of the term can be and often is used to describe all console gamers. That seems to be the general definition that I've been picked up, but it's not than hey I don't really care.
And you are wrong because your arguments are invalid.
What, why?
This definition does not apply to us.
Uhm, why the fuck not?
PC gamers expect these things because they're not only near-standard features for the platform, but because they existed in the previous game and IW went out of their way to remove them for the sake of more profit. If console gamers had to start fiddling with drivers and config files, they would be pissed because they expect that they can just insert a disc and then play the game, as is standard practise on consoles.
The argument that PC gamers are expecting special treatment is invalid.
Ah but expecting what is standard is still elitism and goes back to the definition (which doesn't count for some reason...). Expecting a certain thing, anything, because the game is on the PC is elitism. So when you say PC gamers demand console commands and dedicated servers because that is standard practice you are being a bit of an elitist. However one flaw in my argument (whats this, pointing out my flaws, by gosh) is that there may not be superiority involved. I'm not exactly sure.
The PC is a PC, as in a Personal Computer. It's not a console.
Ah, I apologize. My intent was to write platform. Surely though, the point remains. Can you surely not argue against it instead of just pointing out word misplacement's?
Your argument is a straw man. MW2 didn't piss off PC gamers because the PC is a superior platform and PC gamers want special treatment. This has been explained a million times in a million threads.
No it isn't.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man. A straw man is about directing the argument away from the topic with the hopes of winning and I am disappointed that you will sink so low to use that. I am not trying to 'win' here, just express my feelings on the matter and I see no reason why you feel the need to sink to such lows.
I've been keeping the argument about elitism with MW2 as an example with the term console-tard and the nature of change on the consoles as a side. This isn't about MW2, this is about PC elitism. Honestly man, it sounds like you're itching for a fight concerning this game and I am afraid that I wont meet you on that front as it is something I do not care very much about and have no reason arguing over.
So even if something is changed for the worse, console gamers don't complain. Which means they just go along to get along, instead of saying "hey, this is bullshit."
A lack of complaining doesn't mean that if failed. Gears of War 2 is barely played because of a terrible matchmaking system and as a result failed miserably compared to the first one.
The PC is inherently superior to consoles (except in a few ways), so therefore PC gamers will automatically get a better experience than console gamers (except in a few ways). That's just the way it is. It has nothing to do with deserving things.
Yes, that's the way it is. You think that the PC is superior so you expect superior treatment. ELITISM! What don't you understand about this?
The point is that PC gamers didn't just sit down and shut up, they made it clear that they're not going to put up with that shit. This is something that console gamers would apparently never even consider doing.
No, they would just not buy the game or stop playing it after they bought it. There are plenty of good games on all platforms, people aren't going to play a bad game because they hate sticking it to the man. Not buying the game is much more powerful than an online boycott, people listen to sales. I like to bring up BF:BC in which a group of console gamers headed by Sarcastic Gamer were actually able to stop unjust and game breaking DLC from being put in the game for a cheap buck. I suppose online petitions can work but that was a rare case with an insane amount of drive behind it. Anyway, not to get too off-topic, console gamers stop bad things from occurring in their games, and in one case before it came out. I don't think a PC community has ever done that.
A good port provides an experience equal to that of the original version, except for unavoidable improvements like mouse control, higher resolutions and shorter loading times. That is what people expect. It has absolutely fuckall to do with "elitism."
Expecting a better experience purely because you have it on the PC does, however. If you actually used the definition of elitism that I supplied before (but oh no, that doesn't count :S) than you would realise that.
I'm starting to think that you like to make up the meanings of words
Woe Is You said:
Then why does UT3 on the PS3 support mods? From a technical perspective, there's nothing preventing consoles from supporting mods, rather, it all has to do with money in the end. I mean, it's abundantly clear that Microsoft doesn't want Valve to updates for their games to be free, so there's a good reason to believe that's why mods aren't supported either.
Oh really, I didn't know that. Interesting. Does it have the ability to create the mods on the PS3 or do they have to be created on the PC but available to download onto the PS3? Either, way interesting. You're wrong about Microsoft and Valve though, L4D recieved free updates and so have many other games. Restricting mods so that they can make money doesn't make much sense though. Gamers still buy DLC on the PC with Fallout 3 being an example. I'm not sure how many people downloaded those but I can't see them failing if they release 5 of them. People will still buy DLC with mod support, Microsoft doesn't seem to have much to loose.