True, Its a pain in the ass when your computer dicides to take a shit on you just one random morning.tryx3 said:Well, generally maintaining a PC to play modern games can be expensive, which is why a pc gamer can come off as an elitist.
You weren't, but it appears that way.bagodix said:Why would I refer to everyone who plays consoles when I have two consoles myself?
Are you sure? I made the first post in this argument, you responded.
I suppose. Whatever.And then you started arguing over the definition.
I did, proven by the fact that I responded to pretty much everything. You didn't justify why the definition of elitism is ignored in our case, you just said that everything is invalid. Poor form.Read the entire post.
Read those two again and you will see that they don't contradict each other or go against the definition given by dictionary.com. I apologize if I'm making myself hard to understand here, that is not my intent.Ah but expecting what is standard is still elitism and goes back to the definition which doesn't count for some reason...).Lol. You don't even understand the definition that you yourself posted.Expecting a certain thing, anything, because the game is on the PC is elitism.
Alrighty then, but I still fail to see how my argument is a Straw man. Evidence to back up this claim would be helpful but by doing so would in fact be getting a little bit strawy itself so I would understand why you wouldn't. Still, blatantly calling this argument a straw man is a rather weak attempt wouldn't you say?By straw man I mean "the Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position."
No, that would Call of Duty 4. That game implemented matchmaking for the franchise I think. I've never played number three and my memories of two are blurry to say the least. Playing on a matchmaking system is hardly 'taking it up the ass' though. By playing a matchmaking system on a console only removes small details such as round limit, direct map choice, constant radar and a few other things. Even in hosted maps these are beyond the control of the average player anyway, unless you have a fair and easy going host. Sometimes you get one but most of the time you don't.MW2 is a perfect example of how consoletards completely fail to grasp the nature of PC gaming and how they are happy to take it up the ass from the game industry without a word of complaint.
I rarely see that. No one will say 'you have to play this game even though it sucks' and why would they? They may reply that it doesn't suck but that doesn't mean that everyone has to play a particular game. You have a warped view on these things.And yet on these very forums you constantly see consoletards proclaim that gamers have no right to expect or demand anything because corporations know best.
As I said before, because it's standard doesn't mean demanding it is not elitism.It's the PC's nature to offer things like superior graphics, superior input options, command consoles, dedicated servers, development tools and other things. When we receive these things it is standard treatment, nothing out of the ordinary and nothing unexpected. It's what the PC is all about. To consoletards it may seem like we're living the clouds, but that's just their perspective. They can't comprehend the idea of PC gamers expecting things that consoles do not have.
Ah but you didn't read what I said. I claimed that expecting a purely better experience because the game is on the PC is elitist. I don't consider wanting a good game (or even working game) because you just want a good game is elitist, nah not at all. But then you do have things like mouse controls which improve the game (depending on tastes) so again, I'm not exactly sure how it fits in.Mouse control and different screen resolutions are absolutely fundamental, standard features on the PC. If a port doesn't include those then it can fuck right off to console land because it has no place on the PC. Again you claim that expecting even the most bare essentials is elitism.
Woah, I didn't say that. I think that you should pay more attention and calm down. I see nothing wrong with being a PC elitist granted you don't ram it in peoples faces. If you want a better experience than you have every right to demand it.Apparently PC gamers are just scum who have no right to expect, demand or wish for anything, despite the fact that they're paying customers.
now are you saying they are "up their own asses" just because they dislike consoles and may jokingly bash them from time to time or are they genuinely being assholes about it?Takoto said:Well most of the PC Gamers I know are very elitist, and "up their own asses" as one might say. I've never met one who isn't...
Uh. Don't you agree with the quoted sentiment? I've got live, and I'd have to say he's pretty much right on the money. Perhaps that's just my experience, my accent must attract lambasting.minxamo said:that is why.As a PC gamer I view Xbox live as a place for a bunch of 11 year olds
PC gamers always seem to come off as self righteous pricks who consider any non-pc gamer below them and think that they are superior just because they play on pc.
they refuse to take any else's opinion and always want to seem smart for some reason.
No, not proved. You have no way of knowing who made that image. It's meant as a joke, don't take it seriously.minxamo said:point proved.
PCs:
spacerFlexible; Capable of being more powerful; Varying in price, it can be argued that they are both cheaper and more expensive, depending on how you look at it; Have access to free stuff on the web; Not that high maintenance- most games auto-patch, just like on my 360; Not really subject to viruses; more complicated; have a different interface.
Summary: Computers are objectively superior tools in many ways, but are much more complicated, a bit more expensive, and require not insignificant effort to build, should choose to do so. Also fun if you like tinkering.
Consoles:
spaceInflexible; Often less powerful; Cheaper at default, but everything seems to cost (I gawped at the 70 pound RRP for my 360's wireless adaptor.); The 360, at least, suffers from subscription costs; Can be pirated, and often are, but it's harder; have a different interface.
Summary: Easier, cheaper at point of use, no effort really needed, uniform hardware; however, more expensive in the long-run (50 pounds for a game! Erk! 70 pounds for wireless! Come on!), far more limited capabilities, and, surprisingly, less reliable (in my experience![footnote]My 360 has RRoD twice, and laserburned two disks. PC has never broken. Must just be me.[/footnote]).
Both are good. It just depends what you want.
spaceIf you want ease of use, go console. If you want adaptability and capability, go PC. Be warned though, you'll need to put in some effort and a bit more cash for the latter.
Simple: PC's are more powerful, but more complicated and can be more expensive; Consoles are simple and cheap, but very limited and have hidden costs.
Easy, right? Pick the one that's right for you.
PC gamers are not being elitist.
Pissed off yet?Katana314 said:space[footnote]Thanks for the article, Katana314.[/footnote]A recent interview with developer Infinity Ward has shown plans to release Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 for the Nintendo Wii in Q2 2010. The move has surprised many, including myself, due to the major differences between the 360 and Playstation 3 platforms, versus the Wii's low-graphics, motion-oriented standards. When asked about how they would be incorporating motion controls into the game, Infinity Ward Assistant Designer Nodda R. Guy replied;
"In simple terms, we won't be. We've been committed to providing an equal experience on all platforms, and we'd like to include the Wii in that. We don't fully trust the Wii's motion controls to be fair to everyone, and it would also mean one feature that the 360 version doesn't get. After seeing hundreds of titles that only get motion controls on the Wii, but not on the 360, we feel this is just desserts, in a way."
With the subtraction of motion controls comes another equalizer, in which IW mentioned that they may be 'toning down' graphics for release on the Wii, due to its less powerful graphics processor. Of course, citing their policy of an equal experience, this means the 360, PS3, and PC versions of the game will have reduced, blocky textures and fewer special effects to keep everything the same for everyone.
But the PC is better at what it dose and that includes gaming but the PC has plenty of pitfalls the 360/PS3/(insert inferior proprietary hardware of choice here) has its own pitfalls but manages to 2 things well enough ease of use for 1 or 2 things(gaming,disc video watching) and game choices, the PC sadly dose not have the game software choices but makes up for it in everything else if you are skilled enough to be able to build a PC once every 2-5 years for 500 or less.Katana314 said:To anyone saying the PC players are being unfair to expect "standard" features on their platform, I point you to this joke article I wrote:
http://www.ablanknotebook.com/journal/?p=10
To anyone saying that PCs are just better in each and every way: You're wrong, and shut up.
To anyone saying that Xbox fans always make unfair complaints about the PC: You're wrong, and shut up.
Now in the above two lines, replace PC with XBox and vice-versa, and we're done here.
I'll buy that for a dollar.Scumpernickle said:Console gamers are jealous of our developer's tools and mods. No?
I've had one for a long time now. I loves me some Devil May Cry 4 LDK mode (yay for PC exclusive game modes) with it. It's just the fact that it was a picture that was supposed to be demonstrating one of the many reasons a PC is vastly superior to a console, and yet the guy was playing a cross platform game with a 360 controller rather than the picture showing him playing a tricked out flight sim with a full HOTAS setup, or something like that.tehroc said:You are aware that the Xbox controller is a USB adapter and is 100% plug and play on Vista...
We are the hybrids!shewolf51 said:I play on both the PC and consoles, I'm breaking down barriers dammit! Does this mean I get to be an ambassador?dududf said:Console fanboys/somethings get a hard on when they see PC gamers, due to our unique sexiness but they try to hide it by hating us.
Yup yup.
______________________________________
In all seriousness, they don't like us because we feel entittled to things they don't have. That and we look down on them from which is perceived as "Elitism".
Not my fault Ihatedislike all of you whiney Live people XD