Yes, but aren't those examples rather a problem with indoctrination by a religious institution, trying to keep a hold over the world than the religion itself?Cliff_m85 said:Man is to blame for religious actions, but that very religion inspires those very actions. Religion does harm, it's been shown time and time again.
Ah, but if man is responsible for religion... well, religion can't be the root of all evil.Skeleon said:Yes, but aren't those examples rather a problem with indoctrination by a religious institution, trying to keep a hold over the world than the religion itself?Cliff_m85 said:Man is to blame for religious actions, but that very religion inspires those very actions. Religion does harm, it's been shown time and time again.
Maybe I'm not making much sense here (after all, I'm argueing for the other side here), but I feel that religion itself can be helpful for a community, the problem is keeping it away from worldly power!
France, for example, managed to completely separate state and church. I don't think we need to abolish religion, we just need to have a very clearly drawn line to make sure it doesn't interfere with the state, as well as the freedoms and rights of every human.
That is a nice video. Since I consider myself somewhat of a math person, and also a deep thinker, it made perfect sense to me.Maze1125 said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98OTsYfTt-c&feature=relatedSeekster said:As a History (and Journalism) major I can tell you that there have been far too many coincidences throughout history for there not to be some higher power behind it all.
Well, that's what I said, isn't it?ThrobbingEgo said:Ah, but if man is responsible for religion... well, religion can't be the root of all evil.
One cannot simply keep religion to themselves, as we see time and time again. Man is to blame for religion, period. The books presented that deal in faith have a certain zeal in describing what the nonbeliever will have to deal with. Not to mention what those who go against it's rules must deal with. If we went 100% by what the Bible told us, we'd have a higher case of infanticide today. Religion isn't helpful at all, it is just a mask for human charity honestly. You can't name one thing that religious persons could do charitably that an Atheist could not do as well, but you could possibly name actions that a religious person could do violently that an Atheist could not.Skeleon said:Yes, but aren't those examples rather a problem with indoctrination by a religious institution, trying to keep a hold over the world than the religion itself?Cliff_m85 said:Man is to blame for religious actions, but that very religion inspires those very actions. Religion does harm, it's been shown time and time again.
Maybe I'm not making much sense here (after all, I'm argueing for the other side here), but I feel that religion itself can be helpful for a community, the problem is keeping it away from worldly power!
France, for example, managed to completely separate state and church. I don't think we need to abolish religion, we just need to have a very clearly drawn line to make sure it doesn't interfere with the state, as well as the freedoms and rights of every human.
Hm, I don't know about the last part, since I don't live there. But of course I agree with your first statement. Freedom of religion also means the freedom not to have any religion, of course.Cliff_m85 said:People should have the right to believe in religion, but we should also have the right to lack of religion. The United States has fallen a bit on that end, with each politician wanking their religion all over the place.
And if I go outside I may get shot by a psychopath....if only God could give me a debilitating disease to prevent such a longshot from happening. Perhaps polio would prevent me from walking in the woods and getting mauled by a bear? One can only hope, I suppose.J.E.T. said:Lol I would agree with you, exept one problem, IF my thyroid would have been working right at a point before hand I could have gotten myself killed riding dirt bikes.
Our politicians announce their religion immediately and last election had major Republican candidates announcing joyously that they don't agree with Evolution. George Bush Sr. stated that Atheists aren't true Americans as well. George W. Bush played out the Iraq war with an "Our God" vs. "The Evil-doers God" situation.Skeleon said:Hm, I don't know about the last part, since I don't live there. But of course I agree with your first statement. Freedom of religion also means the freedom not to have any religion, of course.Cliff_m85 said:People should have the right to believe in religion, but we should also have the right to lack of religion. The United States has fallen a bit on that end, with each politician wanking their religion all over the place.
A generalization and a blanket statement. Religion also does incredible amounts of good in the right hands. Look at Mother Theresa, or John Paul II. Sure, it can be abused, but anyone willing to take advantage of religion to abuse it for a cause would get the short stick after death, no?Cliff_m85 said:Man is to blame for religious actions, but that very religion inspires those very actions. Religion does harm, it's been shown time and time again.
Stuck my thoughts in bold.Frequen-Z said:I do not believe anyone should live in fear of a vengeful God. That's the Old Testament God. He's much nicer now
I do not believe you need to believe in a higher power to have morals. Of course. We religious folk believe that God made us with free will: we can choose to do wrong, or even deny his existence.
I do not believe there was a guy 2000 years ago who came back from the dead. Your perogative, mate.
I do not believe there is an all loving god who would send you to burn for eternity if you sin. I like to think of Hell like Dante's Inferno: you have to choose and accept it, and shun God.
I do not believe putting my hands together and wishfully thinking to previously mentioned 2000 year old man will have effect on whatever outcome my thoughts were trying to sway. Well, once again your perogative. You can always just ask the big G himself, you know. There's an old tale about how a priest converted a gambling town: he convinced them that they might as well hedge their bets. I think this is something similar.
Sorry for any and all offence, that's just how I see things.You're just stating your opinion. No harm no foul.
But when you have a religion, you can use it as a crutch to get through difficult times in your life by sing things like 'It was gods plan' and 'He is closer to go now. I suppose it makes them feel better.The infamous SCAMola said:I honestly think life is much easier without a God, no need to go to church on sundays, or having to worry about having "impure thoughts" and all of that bullshit.
May I point out some parts from the Bible? This is who the Bible says you should kill:Skeleon said:Yes, but aren't those examples rather a problem with indoctrination by a religious institution, trying to keep a hold over the world than the religion itself?Cliff_m85 said:Man is to blame for religious actions, but that very religion inspires those very actions. Religion does harm, it's been shown time and time again.
Maybe I'm not making much sense here (after all, I'm argueing for the other side here), but I feel that religion itself can be helpful for a community, the problem is keeping it away from worldly power!
France, for example, managed to completely separate state and church. I don't think we need to abolish religion, we just need to have a very clearly drawn line to make sure it doesn't interfere with the state, as well as the freedoms and rights of every human.
It's not free will though, because if you don't believe in God unconditionally, you'll be sent to Hell where you be TORTURED forever. It's not a choice, it's an ultimatum. It's the sort of 'choice' a criminal gives you when he places a gun to your head and says 'give me your wallet, and I won't shoot you!'Of course. We religious folk believe that God made us with free will: we can choose to do wrong, or even deny his existence.
I won't agrue that. The theory itself was presented by a monk before Hubble ran with it. And mathematically the Big Bang is technically accurate to a point. That point being the Singularity.Maze1125 said:That is the Big Bang, still happening today.
Mother Teresa forced baptisms of the dying in Calcutta as well as prevented the dying from seeing their loved ones before expiring. Add that the medical treatment in Calcutta under Mother Teresa was woefully inept, so woefully inept that other hospitals had better care. Teresa was quoted as saying that their misery 'enlightened her'. Religion helps my arse. Add that she publically denounced divorce but told Princess Diana after her divorce that she hoped her life was now better. I could go on with her nonsense, like taking money from known genocidists and pronouncing them 'good people'.scotth266 said:A generalization and a blanket statement. Religion also does incredible amounts of good in the right hands. Look at Mother Theresa, or John Paul II. Sure, it can be abused, but anyone willing to take advantage of religion to abuse it for a cause would get the short stick after death, no?Cliff_m85 said:Man is to blame for religious actions, but that very religion inspires those very actions. Religion does harm, it's been shown time and time again.
Stuck my thoughts in bold.Frequen-Z said:I do not believe anyone should live in fear of a vengeful God. That's the Old Testament God. He's much nicer now
I do not believe you need to believe in a higher power to have morals. Of course. We religious folk believe that God made us with free will: we can choose to do wrong, or even deny his existence.
I do not believe there was a guy 2000 years ago who came back from the dead. Your perogative, mate.
I do not believe there is an all loving god who would send you to burn for eternity if you sin. I like to think of Hell like Dante's Inferno: you have to choose and accept it, and shun God.
I do not believe putting my hands together and wishfully thinking to previously mentioned 2000 year old man will have effect on whatever outcome my thoughts were trying to sway. Well, once again your perogative. You can always just ask the big G himself, you know. There's an old tale about how a priest converted a gambling town: he convinced them that they might as well hedge their bets. I think this is something similar.
Sorry for any and all offence, that's just how I see things.You're just stating your opinion. No harm no foul.