This is just the evolution of a business. They start off with a great product for a good price. Then it's great product cheap. Then it becomes an adequate produce that's over priced. You show me a successful company that hasn't followed they same path of evolution and I'll show you an idiot.TelHybrid said:First of all, it's spelt "seem".
Second of all, it lags, it's on a poorly programmed peer to peer network where the host selection is random rather than choosing the most suitable host. It also kicks parties from matches for no reason.
The community is mostly made up of loudmouth scouser chavs, or American fratboys, or whiney 12 year old brats, or elitist pricks who get so worked up over certain tactics.
Activision wanted to charge £55 rrp for it, shops charged £45 on average, I don't think it's even worth £30. The campaign is as short as an expansion.
Also let's look at DLC, 1200MS points (around £10) for 3 new maps and 2 revamped Call of Duty 4 maps.
Those good enough reasons?
Ti's still a better game than most dispite it's obvious game flaws which I haven't heard one this site yet. everyone is complaining about the players and not the game itself.