Worst leaders of your country

Recommended Videos

Axolotl

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,401
0
0
Heimir said:
Axolotl said:
Heimir said:
Axolotl said:
Heimir said:
PsychedelicDiamond said:
Hitler.

I win.
Actually Hitler was a brilliant leader and an awesome politician. A genocidl despot, sure. But a bad leader? Hell no. He united a nation and brought all of Europe too its knee's.
Are you kidding? In 12 years he took a country that was while undergoing a huge depression was still one of the countries on earth and in just 12 years reduced it's population by 10% and left it in the power of hortile governments where the Eastern half was being systematically destroyed, raped and murdered and with the Western half being used as a proxy in the cold war.

Seriously I couldn't fuck up a country that much if I tried.
He was still a great leader. His goals were retarded wich made him fail. But as a leader he was solid. Otherwise the nazi parti would never have gotten of the ground at all.
How was he a good leader? He almost destroyed the country.
The country would've been a third world country today were it not for him. The british and the french and the rest of the allied whores are the cause of WW2 by penalizing the people by making the country unable to have any industry worth noting.
The fuck? I mean seriously what the fuck?

He broke Germany free from that and built it up.
Except he didn't, even before the allies tore the country apart Hitler's economic reforms were primarily spin he did very little to actually improve the country. And besides which, he left the country with it being occupied by hostile powers and having suffered millions of casulties.

Sure it ended in a loss. But if he had won then Germany would've ruled Europe.
Yeah but he didn't win. And what's more he could never have won, he took on odds he could not beat and that his meddling in military strategy as well as his idiotic policies both helped Germany to fail even more is just the icing on the cake of his incompotence.

I honestly wish he had so the brits would've been nothing but bootlickers today.
You wish Hitler had won? Really?

The allies were barely any better than Nazi Germany in WW2. But they won, yay. So no punishment for them.
If you're counting the Soviets then maybe but otherwise. No, just no.
 

Xenowolf

New member
Feb 3, 2012
208
0
0
DJjaffacake said:
Recent: James Callaghan, since he presided over the near collapse of our economy.
Historical: King John, because he lost the French territories, caused a civil war, and was just generally shit.
Legendary: Vortigern, for basically inviting the Saxons to come and stay (and take over).
It says on your profile you are from Yorkshire, you do realize that the Anglo-Saxons were the most direct ancestors of the English and the first people to call themselves English? It would techically only be accurate to say Vortigern if you were Welsh or Cornish? Sorry, just had to get that out.
 

Wayne Insane

New member
May 14, 2009
244
0
0
I'm german soo, yeah...

and Dude..
[/quote]Actually Hitler was a brilliant leader and an awesome politician. A genocidl despot, sure. But a bad leader? Hell no. He united a nation and brought all of Europe too its knee's.

OT:Any socialist, leftist, communist parti leader. They are all evil scumbags who should be shot and strung up.[/quote]

...really? He was a megalomaniacal puppet.
Maybe you should come over here and talk to some of the Peolple who actually lived through the whole ordeal on the Nazi Side. Or read "Mein Kampf" which isn't much more than self-contradicting rambling .
He was the public Face of an unexpectedly succsessful Coup d'état, cementing his place as a Leader through idiotic, useless, but huge Projects( like building the famous Autobahn, which wasn't actually that efficent till the 70's) which seemingly diminshed unemployment,brainwashing Kids ( Hitlerjugend, Bund Deutscher Mädel( HJ for Girls)) ridicioulus , Kim Jong-Illian selfimagery, giving the public a scapegoat ( you know, that whole Genocide thing) and good old violence against everybody not liking it. And that's just the Years before the War, you know when the nazis were mostly comprised of actual Human beings and not the Cartoon supervillains they turned into in the later years when they went absolutely mad with the whole "Aryan Race" thing.
 

BristolBerserker

New member
Aug 3, 2011
327
0
0
Really can't believe all the hating on David Cameron. Thatcher I wasn't surprised at because the idiots in this country always blame her even though she had more balls than all Labour PMs put together. David Cameron is trying to help the economy recover by cutting down on spending yet the left keep bitching about everything he does. He'd actually be able to get stuff done if he didn't have to have a coalition with the Lib Dems. Surely the people who got us into this mess are to blame so I shall say that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown(surprised this name hasn't popped up yet) are to blame. They fucked upped Britain by getting us into two american wars and by ruining the economy. Historically, I'd say King John because he lost us loads of land in France.
 

Axolotl

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,401
0
0
Heimir said:
Brits and french promised 56k troops for Finland Vs Russians. Fun facts, 50k were meant to take resources in Sweden and Norway and then drain them before fleeing. So yeah, they were scumbags. Sorry to break your little bubble. And the US and England are guilty for the problems today with Israel. So yeah, same as nazis. Just with better propaganda.
Yes. Those acts are on par with killing over 10 million people.
 

Virus0015

New member
Dec 1, 2009
186
0
0
David Cameron for the moment, I don't think he has the time to redeem himself. Thatcher is also a contender (contributed to starting the Falklands war, later hailed as hero for responding to an invasion like any other sane person would)). Blair did screw up Iraq somewhat, but I wouldn't have minded intervention at some point anyway.
 

ThePenguinKnight

New member
Mar 30, 2012
893
0
0
I think many of us living in the US would have to say George Bush.

People like to pretend Obama's the reason were in such a bad way but they forget Bush put the whole thing into motion.

It's going to take many elections and many years just to get back to where we were and seeing how shallow our politicians are I don't see any hope in sight.
 

Sutter Cane

New member
Jun 27, 2010
534
0
0
ThePenguinKnight said:
I think many of us living in the US would have to say George Bush.

People like to pretend Obama's the reason were in such a bad way but they forget Bush put the whole thing into motion.

It's going to take many elections and many years just to get back to where we were and seeing how shallow our politicians are I don't see any hope in sight.
Really? Bush?? Don't get me wrong, Bush was a shitty president, but the worst? Worse than Jackson and his trail of tears? Worse than Johnson who fucked up reconstruction? Worse than Grant who let corruption run wild? Worse than Coolidge who set up the great depression? Worse than Harding who failed to prevent the great depression?
 

RN7

New member
Oct 27, 2009
824
0
0
Um, I'll pretend to Mexican and say Victoriano Huerta. He was a Porfirian old guard general without any of Diaz's good ideas, and he ended up spending his tenure in office attempting to consolidate his power so he could spend more time consolidating his power

Francisco Madero comes in 2nd because he was too weak to bring about the changes Mexico needed and incited revolution in Mexico after causing more problems than he fixed.
 

Jakub324

New member
Jan 23, 2011
1,339
0
0
David Cameron, current PM of the UK. He lies, he's unable to connect with anyone and he seems to be trying his best to send all sixty million of us to financial ruin.
IDIOT!
 

Agow95

New member
Jul 29, 2011
445
0
0
Oliver Cromwell, He executed the King for Treason, took the job of ruling the country (wasnt king) with a pay of £100,000 a year (the same pay for executing the king) and then he banned travel on sunday, work on sunday, christmas dinner (they had to Fast on christmas day), public celebrations, basically he banned fun, yet he still had a massive party at his daughters wedding.
 

agent_orange420

New member
Sep 30, 2011
75
0
0
Keith Vaz - twonk who keep on banging on about the link between games and violent behaviour. Besides being a total crook that is.

Tony Blair - Lying, manipulative weasel of man

Gordon brown - sold off all our gold during the good times, so when the recession hit we were up the creek without any saftey net, cheers for that. oh, and for being unelected to boot.

latest cretins we have are tools too, but its a committee of idiocy.
 

ThePenguinKnight

New member
Mar 30, 2012
893
0
0
Sutter Cane said:
ThePenguinKnight said:
I think many of us living in the US would have to say George Bush.

People like to pretend Obama's the reason were in such a bad way but they forget Bush put the whole thing into motion.

It's going to take many elections and many years just to get back to where we were and seeing how shallow our politicians are I don't see any hope in sight.
Really? Bush?? Don't get me wrong, Bush was a shitty president, but the worst? Worse than Jackson and his trail of tears? Worse than Johnson who fucked up reconstruction? Worse than Grant who let corruption run wild? Worse than Coolidge who set up the great depression? Worse than Harding who failed to prevent the great depression?
For me, personally, yes I consider Bush to be the worst.

I have friends and family who were sent to Iraq and never made it back. And due to the chain of events Bush started by his stupidity and greed me, my friends, and my family can barely get by because of the economy.
 

Axolotl

New member
Feb 17, 2008
2,401
0
0
Heimir said:
Axolotl said:
Heimir said:
Brits and french promised 56k troops for Finland Vs Russians. Fun facts, 50k were meant to take resources in Sweden and Norway and then drain them before fleeing. So yeah, they were scumbags. Sorry to break your little bubble. And the US and England are guilty for the problems today with Israel. So yeah, same as nazis. Just with better propaganda.
Yes. Those acts are on par with killing over 10 million people.
Considering that if the nazis had attacked the blood would be on french and british hands. So yes, it is. Because that behaviour is pretty much the same as the nazis. False, vile and dishonest. And not caring about human lives.
Do you even read what youre writing?

Let me say it again. An act of Realpolitik in a war is not on the same moral level as the Holocaust.
 

Valkaris

New member
Jun 8, 2010
204
0
0
Honestly I would say George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson etc were are pretty crappy leaders, only because they fought a war to create the country in the first place. We might as well have just stayed a colony of Brittan and just joined Canada in one big happy north american family (maybe conquer mexico).