For the powahz from Scot Pilgrim, I would. But honestly, I don't believe that the moral or health arguments hold. Life involves the eating of other animals;
^also this^outcesticide69 said:No, because vegans are hypocrites. Even broccoli screams when you rip it from the ground.
Yes, because bodybuilding is not "real exercise" *rolls eyes*.SsilverR said:screw body building, that's dead muscle to me .. as i said in my last post .. there are people from my boxing club that have been vegan for years and they're some of the best fighters in my club, they look healthy and there are even ufc fighters that are vegan.lacktheknack said:Animal protein is still the best for bodybuilding.SsilverR said:yeah, milk .... that's literally the hardest part man XDlacktheknack said:No way. TRUE veganism goes as far as not cooking anything, and that's really hard on the digestive system.
Plus, there's all kinds of great vitamins and minerals and flavanoids and fats in animal products that are really hard to find in vegetables. You're cutting yourself off from animal protein, for example, which is much more effective at muscle-building than soy protein.
Besides, if you stop me from drinking mah milk, I will CLUB you.
but you can get alot of proteins from other plants, not just soy
And that's just one. It's really hard to find, for example, Omega-3 in plants outside of flax.
Again, just my two cents. Veganism won't kill you, it just isn't the best choice.
muscles from body building is just mass, the true muscles you get from real excersises count
Great! If I can make someone laugh, or at least smile, then I honestly think I've achieved something wholesome and worthwhile. Glad to be of service!tjcross said:lol thanks you just lightened my mood by (whips out a calculator) 9.5% of my maximum happiness which is roughly the equivalent of a well told joke. fancy that
This is essentially me. I'm very much attached to the "meat and potatoes" kind of diet. I honestly do not like damn near every vegetable. I try them repeatedly, and can never bring myself to find a veggie I can tolerate.AccursedTheory said:Meat is delicious. Meat is tasty. Meat makes my world go round.
I will NEVER go vegan. if a Doctor told me I'd die if I ate one more strip of bacon, I'd go to the grave with grease on my chin and a smile on my face.
The last part of this kinda bugs me. I respect the thought, but the ethics of meat consumption are really varied, and pushing a whole society to adopt veganism just seems really one-sided.SsilverR said:Personally i feel privileged to be in a society that gives me the option to live whatever lifestyle i want, and although i now personally believe that humans may reach a point where everyone has these options and perhaps should reduce or fully stop meat consumption, not only for overall health but also for the sake of overall ethics.
and you have nothing to say about how animals that are raised to be eaten won't become instinct as easily as wild animals?SsilverR said:not only that .. i worked in an french/algerian abbatoir for almost a year ... i've not only seen slaughter, i've done it .. alot. and already mentioned we used to hunt. alot of the places i worked at or seen were kind of inhumane but ....this WAS an islamic slaughterhouse so ... yeah .. not too nice a way to go ... the abbatoirs here in england (well most of them) usually get their meat already dead and ready to carve so .. can't really comment about how they lived.jack583 said:have you ever seen a place that keeps livestock for slaughter?SsilverR said:i would rather eat something with a fighting chance too ... i used to hunt with my dad years ago and like i said earlierjack583 said:i would not.
why?
well look at it this way:
plant cells and animal cells are exactly the same. execpt that the plant cell has an added "cell wall".
now plants--as a whole, not just cells--do not have nerves and therefore can't feel pain.
they also can't defend themselves or run.
but when eaten, the plant cells will die the same way animal cells would.
so eating a plant is the same as eating a cow.
the difference is that plants can't cry out in pain as you kill them.
the cells could be feeling pain, but they can't scream out saying they are.
the just have to sit there, motionless, waiting to die.
so yeah, i'd rather eat something that has a fighting chance, then something that can't fight back.
if we hunted our food, i would not be vegan right now ... and animal that has lived a full life in the wild then got killed quickly and cleanly by an ethical hunters bullet is good meat ... no hormones, no cages, no suffering.
but alot of the meat you see in your supermarkets today had no such thing as a fighting chance.
yeah, silent screamers or not ... we gotta eat something. most plants are ready to go ... if they aren't then the edible bits wouldn't be ripe (edible) would they?
like how apples drop from a tree
not really to bad.
no cages, and often plenty of room to move.
a cow is born, and grows up always well fed.
plus there is the fact that cows and other animals are raised a bred to be eaten.
you will never see a cow, chicken, or any other animal in the meat asile on the endangered species list.
yes there are a lot of unwanted chemicals in meat, but like you said, the only way to get meat without those is to kill an animal yourself.
Yes, biochem. You know, science. I am a science major, ergo I will only consider things from that angle. Physiology...never did like the people over in the bio department. Your assertion that there is something more to diet than biochem is appallingly wrong. It's the sort of idiotic statement I wouldn't expect anybody who has gone past high school to make. Biochemistry is the study of the chemical reactions in life, of how life functions on the molecular scale. All that we are, all that enables us to exist, can be expressed in this way. What we eat is simply another factor in a large chain of cycles, and cofactors/vitamins/minerals are simply other factors in those. Because of the way evolution functions, all mammals share cycles, which in turn means we require the same nutrients. One cannot go purely by eating behavior, of course (or do you eat grass like a cat?), to gauge where they are getting said nutrients, but one can get a fairly good idea. Along with a basic understanding of nature, chemistry, and biology, it is pretty easy to come up with a way to get all essential nutrients in a given environment.Cowabungaa said:Because human physiology isn't made for it. We don't have a digestive tract made for a herbivore diet either, it's way too short to properly extract all the energy you can get from it. It's all nice from a bio-chemical point of view, and yeah bio-chemically we work around the same, but there are stark differences in physiology. Look at a gorilla, a herbivore primate. Look at his gut. We don't have that. We're suited for an omnivoric hunter-scavenger-gathering diet, that's what our natural shtick is. Again, you're approaching this from the wrong angle, there's a lot more to diet than bio-chemistry, you seem to forget that.thethingthatlurks said:Uhm, same metabolic cycles imply similar nutrient needs, the closer related to another species we are, the more overlap there is. Not only are humans perfectly able to live a herbivore diet, our entire digestive system is better suited for that than for an carnivore diet. Now that's a simple fact. You're right though, humans were never 100% herbivore, which is why we have the rather limited ability to digest meat (limited when compared to true carnivores).
And why pray tell is my body not suited for living an herbivore diet? Show me some evidence, scientific papers, text books, etc.
Doesn't work all that well. Lots of herbivores eat plants humans can't digest properly. We can do fuck-all with cellulose.
No offence but FUCK NO! I am not a "must eat meat for every meal" kind of bloke but there is no way on earth I would just eat veggies. To me all veggies taste of nothing, which is fine, but I want flavour!SsilverR said:I don't even mean ovo-lacto vegetarian, I'm talking PURE vegan.
Vegans consume neither the animal or the products of any animal with a face, meaning that things like milk, eggs and even honey are off the list.
Apparently, there are quite alot of health benifits that come with going full vegan and i was wondering if anyone else here would do it (I just recently decided to do it for personal reasons) or is already living the vegan lifestyle.
Do you even think humans should become (ok i REALLY don't want to use the word "Vegan" again) herbivores? since our very physiology dictates that we're omnivores and meat to some people is literally the only lifeline.
Personally i feel privileged to be in a society that gives me the option to live whatever lifestyle i want, and although i now personally believe that humans may reach a point where everyone has these options and perhaps should reduce or fully stop meat consumption, not only for overall health but also for the sake of overall ethics.
Hopefully i won't evolve into one of those "omfg u had a BURGER?!?!"**throws bucket of cows blood on mums face** ..... truly cringe worthy >.<
+ i'm not really vegan yet ... only been at it for a week.
Woah, are you really a science major? You don't act like one, resorting to personal attacks, ignoring human physiology, which is just plain silly when we're talking about eating things. Who's making idiotic statements here? You're just being incredibly narrow-minded. I mean, really, you never liked the people in the physiology deparement? But no matter.thethingthatlurks said:snip
Sees how much you don't know about physiology, how important it is and how you're wrong that it's all about bio-chemistry; we cannot digest cellulose. Sure it's not toxic, but who cares, if you eat a ton of grass you'll crap the vast majority of it right back out again without ever utilising it. We don't have the digestive tract to deal with it, break it down properly so we can use it's energy to the fullest. Why do you think I used the gorilla example? They have a massive gut to ferment plant material, to break down cellulos. We don't have that because we're not herbivores, we're not made to live on a natural, herbivore diet, Homo Sapiens has never done so, we lack the physiology for it, we're just not evolved that way. Yet you claim you can do it.And cellulose isn't toxic, so moot point.
Calling you an idiot when you write idiotic things is something scientists don't do? Meh, some of us are antisocial assholes, who hate nothing more than people spreading misinformation...Cowabungaa said:Woah, are you really a science major? You don't act like one, resorting to personal attacks, ignoring human physiology, which is just plain silly when we're talking about eating things. Who's making idiotic statements here? You're just being incredibly narrow-minded. I mean, really, you never liked the people in the physiology deparement? But no matter.thethingthatlurks said:snip
Sees how much you don't know about physiology, how important it is and how you're wrong that it's all about bio-chemistry; we cannot digest cellulose. Sure it's not toxic, but who cares, if you eat a ton of grass you'll crap the vast majority of it right back out again without ever utilising it. We don't have the digestive tract to deal with it, break it down properly so we can use it's energy to the fullest. Why do you think I used the gorilla example? They have a massive gut to ferment plant material, to break down cellulos. We don't have that because we're not herbivores, we're not made to live on a natural, herbivore diet, Homo Sapiens has never done so, we lack the physiology for it, we're just not evolved that way. Yet you claim you can do it.And cellulose isn't toxic, so moot point.
Now with modern science and food technologies we can engineer our meals so that people can choose not to use animal products, but we're talking about a situation in which all that is not around. You're just ignoring so much things related to physiology, food gathering, processing, you name it.
I used it as an example for how physiology matters. While we may have the same bio-chemical pathways as gorillas or cows, they can still do something we can't, live on stuff we can't live on.thethingthatlurks said:Also, I've never suggested eating cellulose, nor have I claimed to be able to digest it. I have no idea why you went on to rant about that, so either you did not read my post, want to put words into my mouth, or your expertise doesn't extend beyond one particular primate's ability to digest plant matter. I know we can't digest it, but eating is pretty damn harmless.