You can wipe one MOVIE of the face of the planet...

Recommended Videos

moretimethansense

New member
Apr 10, 2008
1,617
0
0
WinkyTheGreat said:
moretimethansense said:
Also I'd like to delete Citizen Cain(sp?) So people would have to find another movie they've never watched to point to and say "That's a work of art!".
Citizen Kane is damned good. I might have to stop you from destroying that.

OT: I would say Twilight, but that wouldn't stop the books from existing. After that is The Phantom Menace, but as was said above
thaluikhain said:
...there's too many Star Wars movies to deal with.
Since I can only stop one I can't stop all of the prequels. Therefore, gonna have to say The Wicker Man remake. Or really anything with Nicholas Cage... Tell you what, can I just get rid of Nicholas Cage?
It may well be a good film, most people that praise it have never seen the damn thing though and that annoys me.
If your going to say something about a film, good or bad, at least watch it first.

Also I quite enjoyed the Cage remake, it was bloody hilarious!
A steaming pile but hilarious nonetheless.
 

Manji187

New member
Jan 29, 2009
1,444
0
0
Clash of the Titans....or maybe I should do John Travolta a favor and erase Battlefield Earth. Hmm...
 

darkstarangel

New member
Jun 27, 2008
177
0
0
Crap, how do I limit myself to just one?

Well since most of them have been mentioned I will re introduce my distain for the Lord of the Rings films. Now I loved the books & the movies would have been good if they just followed the real story line. Instead characters were out of character, important scenes were missing, scenes that did not happen were added, characters that did not exist were added, good characters were made evil, specific characters did things that other characters were supposed to do, other cool monsters were removed, basically the film was a mish-mash of something barely resembling the book.

And the two main arguements for why he did this was that he did'nt have enough time or money to do it right. BS! The first star wars trilogy was being released around the same time & George Lucas took his sweet-arse time so why could'nt Jackson? Plus he pulled that crap where he releases the DVD then a few months after everyone has a copy he releases an extended edition. With those few extra hours he could have put in the scenes chopped from the story & could have saved more time by culling the scenes that did'nt happen in the book.

And as for money, sure he was wise to hire equipment in New Zealand but he had real armour made with fine details etched into it. Most unnecessary as it wont be seen on screen, chews up more of the budget as well as time needed to get the movie finished.
Seriously it should never have been made. But now he's gonna butt rape & teabag the Hobbit too. What disaster will this film (despite being a two parter supposedly) will become.

Plus any game, comic or cartoon that is poorly adapted to a live action flick can also be included.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
Without a doubt, High School Musical.

Honourable mentions:
-The Super Mario Bros. Movie.
-Twilight.
-The Last Airbender. Wasnt bad, but it should have been at least 2 movies.
-Fred: the Movie.
-Scary Movie and all of its sequels and spinoffs.
 

ZeroMachine

New member
Oct 11, 2008
4,397
0
0
I refuse to allow that to happen to the Twilight movies. They're hilariously bad.

The Last Airbender, though... that movie was even "so bad it's funny". It was like a train wreck you couldn't take your eyes off of, but instead of leaving you completely uninvolved, it eventually kills everything you love whether it's near the train or not. So that's my vote.
 

northeast rower

New member
Dec 14, 2010
684
0
0
Avatar, and not The Last Airbender. I thought that James Cameron's "masterpiece" was nothing more than a masterpiece of shit.
 

elcamino41383

New member
Mar 24, 2009
602
0
0
Cloverfield and Inglorious Basterds are my top picks. By the time anything happened in either of the movies, I no longer gave a shit, I just wanted it to end.
 

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,563
0
0
Bayformers(huur penis joke huuuur and shitty mech designs)
all of the Disney Tween movies(they are overated and suck)
the Justin Bieber movie(because its based on bieber)
Twilight series (becuase of its fanbase)
all the spoof movies (with the exception of the scary movies)(just watch them or their trailers)
I was going to put T3 on here but in comparrison it was a fucking masterpiece
 

Shifty Tortoise

New member
Sep 10, 2008
365
0
0
It's pretty hard to pick the worst of Uwe Bolls atrocity's isn't it?

So i'm gonna pick Twilight, i figure i can kill 3 birds with one stone there, if the first wasn't made neither would the others.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Woodsey said:
I don't know about that; he looked more beat up in Indy 4 than any other of the other 3 (probably because Ford was). And yeah, it's mysticism, it's also bullshit that requires total suspension of disbelief, as is the tank scene, but because you know what type of film it is (knowing that it's just a film to begin with), I don't see why everyone suddenly feels the need to give it the scientific treatment.

The mine cart scene in Temple of Doom has him defeat gravity.
The fridge scene wasn't even the worst part, really. The fact that the script went through so many rewrites was a big enough sign that this movie shouldn't have been made.
- Indiana Jones doesn't belong in the 50's.
- Harrison Ford came across as way too old and tired to play Indy again. They could've played off that by making him lose his place in the world as an aging hero, but they didn't.
- Marian looked like she was stoned all the way through the movie.
- I like Cate Blanchet, but she was not in any way a menacing villain. The previous movies had great creepy villians that you couldn't wait to see die in some extravagant way.
- The Indy trilogy was all practical effects and stunts which makes them so thrilling to watch. Indy 4 was all CGI and soundstages.
- The whole subplot between Indy and Ray Winstone with him being Indy's friend, then betraying him, then being a double agent, and back to being a traitor felt like it was written by a 5-year old.

There's also diffence in questioning the logic of a science fiction movie as opposed to that of a fantasy movie. I don't have a problem suspending my disbelieve if Gandalf jumps on top of a giant eagle and flies away in Lord of the Rings, but if I see the Terminator doing it then it's going to look fucking stupid.
And in the Indiana Jones movies there were always clear boundries between the events of the natural world (war, the Nazis, tank battles and fist/fire fights) and the supernatural events (the ark of the covenant, face melting, heart ripping, burning stones, the holy grail, rapid aging).
I don't have a problem with someone's heart being ripped out with him still being alive if it's within the context of a supernatural event. But if someone tries to pull off Indy surviving a nuclear blast in a fridge that crash lands miles away with him being A-okay in a the context of a real world environment, then I'm going to call major bullshit.

Not that I think the movie should be erased from existence, because as you can tell by my posts, I love ripping on it.
 

nipsen

New member
Sep 20, 2008
521
0
0
Just one film...

Hm.

I guess it'll have to be a movie that both George Lucas and Steven Spielberg love.