Agreed in Underworld. The only thing I didn't like about, say, the first movie, was how the romance just sorta' happened, they stared and made out, and there wasn't much build up. But, at least that means it was never supposed to be put forth (the romance), which is good, because we really need to tone down the relation between vampires and romance.G1eet said:In all the time I've been here, I've only met one Disneytard.FelixFox. said:He's right. You won't find them here. You might not be looking hard enough.
She made horrible arguments.
"U guyz r just jaelous of them."
Jealous of fruity teens that attract hordes of young girls? *****, please, I'm more jealous of Boomers.
Edit:How do you feel about Darren Shan's interpretation of them?KjellKanon said:I liked Twilight.
But I'm a vampire buff in general, so what's another movie?
True Blood and the Underworld Trilogy suits my fancy better though.
..And lets not forget Angel, god that show was awesome..
Also, the Underworld trilogy is probably my favorite interpretation of vamps in terms of badassery.
Unless you count the charismatic Bela Lugosi, as Bram Stoker's Dracula. Him pulling romance is a ploy, so it's awesome, because he just tricks them.