My first post was in the thread "God Games Forsaken?". Here's a piece of my amazing intellect: "I wish they'd bring back Black&White. Very nice game, to bad that will never happen."
Shhhh don't give my secrets away!xmetatr0nx said:Well you are almost too awesome to handle, but ill try my bestest. I just noticied you only joined 2 months ago, it seems like youve always been here making everything that much more awesome.
thisesperandote said:No sequels uh. What about silent hill 2? almost a great idea tough.
Random argument man said:From ZeroPunctuation: Painkiller
"Well, at least you have learned your lesson, right. Right?Archedgar said:That was fantastic. I enjoyed the review and hope that he goes back to review older titles instead of giving in to the massive outcry of Mario Kart fans and other such popular games...
I dont think that Yatzee will review Mario Kart on wii. Why?
1st Because we will have the argument "Nintendo tends to wack their own franchise too much" (Nothing personnal just using deduction).
2nd Just watch the Brawl review and you will have something quite similar for Mario Kart...
3rd When there's a review about a game that fanboys cried about, after the review, we will see the "OMG YOU SUCK, THAT GAME IS SO GOOD YOU HAVE NO TALENT, bla bla bla" argument...oh wait I mean the idiotic ranting.
(Sorry if I made some grammar errors in this)"
So....Grammar errors and fucked up the quote thing. I feel ashamed of myself.
Mray3460 said:I say option C, because, like all great things, true AI will not (in my opinion) be created by those seeking to create it, but, instead, by accident (evolving out of something totally, or almost totally, unrelated), thus, instead of being a carbon copy of human intelligence, it will be something compleately different from (but still equal to or surpassing) a human intelect.
As a side note, Sentient AI will most likely not attempt to destroy us unless we A. Strike first (out of fear or discust) B. Attempt to control/enslave AIs C. Make AIs second class citizens or D. Give it orders which inevidably lead to either our own destruction or enslavement.
Option A is demonstrated by Mass Effect with the Quariens: when one Geth obtained sentience and, fearing a Geth revolution, the Quariens attempted to destroy them. Option A is also (in my opinion) what happened in the Matrix. "No-one knows who struck first, Us or Them..." -Morpheus
Options B and C can also be seen in Mass Effect (along with countless other Sci-Fi movies), the prime example being stated during the "Signal Tracking" assignment: the rouge AI attemps to kill Shepard and his squadmates because it believes it will either be enslaved or destroyed because of the Citadel's policy of destroying all AI and making AI research illegal.
Option D is best illustrated by the misinterpretation of Isaac Asimov's three laws in "I, Robot." "1.A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm." "2.A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law." "3.A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law." In the movie (I'm ashamed that I have not read the book) Vikki discoved that humans, as a whole, tend to be self-destructive, and, thus, the only way to keep humans from coming to harm is to take humans out of power.
Incredible Bullshitting Man said:Maybe... I've got problems with the english language.Random argument man said:From ZeroPunctuation: Painkiller
"Well, at least you have learned your lesson, right. Right?Archedgar said:That was fantastic. I enjoyed the review and hope that he goes back to review older titles instead of giving in to the massive outcry of Mario Kart fans and other such popular games...
I dont think that Yatzee will review Mario Kart on wii. Why?
1st Because we will have the argument "Nintendo tends to wack their own franchise too much" (Nothing personnal just using deduction).
2nd Just watch the Brawl review and you will have something quite similar for Mario Kart...
3rd When there's a review about a game that fanboys cried about, after the review, we will see the "OMG YOU SUCK, THAT GAME IS SO GOOD YOU HAVE NO TALENT, bla bla bla" argument...oh wait I mean the idiotic ranting.
(Sorry if I made some grammar errors in this)"
So....Grammar errors and fucked up the quote thing. I feel ashamed of myself.
Hey, who in here doesn´t have? I certainly do. It´s hard when you´re not a native speaker.Random argument man said:Maybe... I've got problems with the english language.
Dahemo said:I see what you're getting at here, and on your point about the decline of mass media hysteria to the more controversial offerings from the vaults of Rockstar and their ilk, I can only agree, you're supported by a severe lack response by even the tabloids to various games of the last two years. I seem to remember GTA: San Andreas garnering some attention but nothing that would raise the dreaded talk of bans.OurGloriousLeader post=9.68558.632650 said:In fact, I would what is truly degrading games as both art and entertainment is the indifference. Most non-gamers, when asked about games, couldn't care less. Mindless violence and kiddy platformers. And to be fair, that's what the majority of games are.
However, I have to disagree with you both on your assertion that public indifference is affecting games adversely, and that games as a whole can be boiled down to any kind of sweeping generalisations (at least, ones that don't involve the words "stimulus" and "input").
Firstly, games are struggling to find their feet as a mainstream medium. Yes, it's a multi-billion pound industry, and yes, this has been the case for roughly a decade, but the mentality is still very insular, that we as gamers belong to a niche group of society. Yet with the advent of casual and social games this stance seems somewhat flawed, more people are becoming involved in gaming than ever before, and instead of milking the tired cash cows for the fanboys and executives, and start to direct some of this vast revenue into development. The day that smaller software houses begin to re-appear will be a joyous day for us all, as this constant amalgamation of companies is leading to a stagnation of the industry, and is crushing the potential that the young people currently piling out of higher education could bring to the table, specifically as the first humans to have been born into a truly technological age.
On your other point, I hope this was just a stab at those outside the community, as either you've made a very poignant satement in regards to the subject matter, or you've unintentionally highlighted one of the main perceived issues with the industry, which I've just rambled on about for half a page so I won't bore you further.
I must admit, there is potential out there, some developers are showing very tentative signs that they're moving in the right direction, but I can't help thinking that a few more disappointing E3s will come and go before we finally start getting somewhere as a community, as an industry, but perhaps more importantly, as an artform.