"bleeding heart"? When did I ever mention morals in any shape or form?Demented Teddy said:They would not leave so we had to force them out of their homes.Zac_Dai said:Of course you think its valid, otherwise you wouldn't have come to that conclusion.Demented Teddy said:My logic is valid.Zac_Dai said:Yes.Demented Teddy said:Oh really?Zac_Dai said:You're just as insane as they are and like them not in a "cool" way.Demented Teddy said:Really?!
I would have loved it if they burned the entire planet to get at the unobtainium.
I prefer our cities to that stone age socioty that the Na'vi have.
Hell, why didn't they just genocide the Na'vi with WMD's or something?!
....when the Humans blew the home tree to bits and when the Na'vi were charging the Humans on horses and on foot and the Humans greeted them with a wall of high velocity metal....oh yes.
But this the internet and I don't expect anything else.
You think that the fact that I think that we shouldn?t give a shit about an inferior race makes me the equal of those that are suicidal because they can't go to Pandora?
Since both conclusions are arrived at using extremely unsound logic.
It's simply a difference in opinion.
But genocide is never the best solution to a problem since there is always far better ways to solve it. Thus it being your opinion makes no difference.
So it still holds true that your logic is unsound.
I can say the same to you about your opinion, your bleeding heart outlook on the world is illogical to me.
I'm simply using reason to show how genocide isn't the best solution and if you had put more thought into it you would have realised that.
In the case of Avatar and the big tree.
If they wouldn't move then why not just use sub surface mining instead of open pit mining? That way the tree wouldn't need to be cut down and people forcefully removed. Instead they didn't and it ended in a fight they lost, so how was that the best solution?
I'm not trying to flame you or get a forum victory here. I'm simply trying to get you to think.