Noelveiga said:
That was terrible.
4) Extreme, extreme wibbly wobblyness. The Doctor is broken free by himself travelling back in time to break himself free after being broken free by himself time travelling back to break himself free. In season 3 the Master needed to refurbish an entire TARDIS to support a paradox that, in all honesty, was far simpler. Last season, David Tennant was extremely conflicted at the notion of minor rippling throughout history. This season he's rewriting entire universes by skipping back and forth in his own timeline, which is something that has always been either impossible or forbidden. What is up with that?
And yes, in Blink the Doctor sent messages forward in time so that the TARDIS would be sent back to him. If I had known paradoxing was now the Doctor's superpower I would have hated Blink back then. Maybe I can tell myself in the past to hate Blink now.
5) More extreme wibbly wobblyness, this time paired with plotholeness. The Daleks apparently extracted a full version of Rory's psyche out of Amy. So that is technologically possible. So... why not do that, then, if Amy can just will things back into existence by remembering them? And yeah, how does that work?
6) Oh, this is a good one. How did the universe survive the Time War, in which battle TARDISes were used and blown up willy-nilly by the Daleks, if a single TARDIS explosion can erase the entire universe? Were the Daleks aware of this in season 1 when they shot a rocket at it? That sounds like a nice deterrent for a war: "Hey, if you destroy my spaceship the entire creation will be erased".
I agree that this episode/season was almost completely trash, because it was lacking personality among other things. Its funny if you watch confidential Moffat admits to not knowing what characters purposes are such as the new daleks.
Answers to your questions
#4 The whole of time and space has been destroyed I don't think a time paradox applies to a universe without time itself
#5 Not to sure about this one ( I'm kinda just creating an excuse for Moffat's writing here) but I guess Amy adsorbed so much time energy that her memory acts as the pandorical does and has an imprint of events in the the universe (such as the doctor) and using the time energy can bring him back (much like the doctor did to "reboot" the universe, or how Rose became omnipotent when she absorbed the whole of the time vortex)
#6 Someone of immense knowledge of the Tardis rigged it so it would explode in such a way to destroy the universe ( a comparison in the 3rd season episode "Smith and Jones" a MRI machine was rigged to destroy the brainwaves of everyone on earth, MRI machines cant regularly do this much like the Tardis can not blow up the universe when blown up conventionally.
Now for some of my own question/thoughts
1. I think I remember prisoner 0 saying something about silence falling in all universes (much like the reality bomb from the season 4 finale) don't really know what that means, and the way Moffat writes I'm sure it wont mean anything. But it could mean another parallel universe story, meaning Rose might come back.
2.Why do sometimes the cracks in time eat people so that they never exist and other times they act as a portal between to parts of space.
3. Another reference to the reality bomb. Why is it that every race including the daleks teamed up to try to stop the universe from being destroyed, but didn't when the whole of creation is threatened by the reality bomb.
4. If the doctor gets erased from history why the fuck is their even an earth for Amy to get married on. The doctor has saved the earth countless times and with out him it would be devastated (as shown in the season 4 episode "Turn Left").
5. Also not sure if it matters but why the hell were the parallel universe versions of the Cybermen there, I believe they even had the Cybus Industries Logo on their chest plates.
6. Last thing, so if all the things eaten by the time crack come back does that mean everyone will remember the Daleks invading, and the Cybermen on christmas? And does that Rory at the wedding have memory from the point he died beneath the Earth or from when he was the Auton copy ( which to me is impossible because it physically isn't him) and why doesn't Rory seem any wiser at the museum, seeing as he's been alive for nearly 2000 years he should be as or more insightful than the Doctor who is only 900 or so.
RANTs;
1. Why did they get rid of all the old cast of characters, especially captain Jack. Regenerating doesn't mean he cant ever talk to his friends again. Its basically like starting a whole new doctor who tv show after they've already established the characters. Wouldn't that be cool if Jack showed up out of nowhere and rescued The Doctor from the Panorica, but of course that wont happen.
2. I feel Mat Smith completely lacks personality as the doctor, at least when compared to David Tennant. Mat seems quieter and shows less expression.
3. Amy Pond has honestly not helped the doctor at all since they met, you can say she got him out of problems but when you think back who started those problems? Most likely she did.