What about calling women "girls"? I'm sure there's at least a few females offended by that infantilization.
And my wife only does so rarely.TheBritish said:My girlfriend doesn't visit this forum actuallyGrampy_bone said:Ha ha, I think this guy has it right. "Oh look at me, I am so concerned for the plight of women, I empathize with them and respect them! Now, want to go back to my place?" Invariably it seems that men who try to advocate female empowerment are just tools trying to get laid.![]()
Why can't it be both? Why do we have to assume that because a guy is chivalrous he's doing it just to get laid? Can't I respect women and still want to have sex?Grampy_bone said:Ha ha, I think this guy has it right. "Oh look at me, I am so concerned for the plight of women, I empathize with them and respect them! Now, want to go back to my place?" Invariably it seems that men who try to advocate female empowerment are just tools trying to get laid.
Funny story about this particular plague:MissPixxie said:Demented Teddy said:It's the worst on MMORPGs
I can't move from one side of a room or area to the other side in the MMO Phantasy Star Universe without some asshole messaging me:
Low-life said:Want to send me a pic?
This. I am forever getting this.
Why can I not just enjoy my game as a player, instead of an object?
So should I be offended if a womyn says that I should enjoy my "boy's night out?" Or if I want to hang with the dudes? Or if my girlfriend calls me "baby?" (I'm fairly certain that's literally an infantilization)Rosicrucian said:What about calling women "girls"? I'm sure there's at least a few females offended by that infantilization.
I like this post, not just 'cause it's on my side of the camplizzielizzie said:*snip*
For me, it's not so much about making changes as it is... discussionRauten said:As much as I more or less agree with the points presented here by the community... aren't these posts sort of useless? I look at them and I can't help but think "More preaching to the converted".
Good job.Grampy_bone said:I disagree with this entire article.
Because sexism is just as much a men's issue. We have to live in a bullshit world where men that drool at breasts and use words like 'ta-tas' represent cultured, reasonable and mature men poorly.Grampy_bone said:Why is it that MEN complain about beautiful women in videogames?
You did say it. What a big boy, forming your own thoughts. However, wrong. There, I said it.Grampy_bone said:Here's a clue: Beauty is a core part of femininity there I said it.
Bullshit argument. Men are strong, powerful and dominant in games where that's a primary design goal. Women playing the same parts are not strong, powerful and dominant, they're party dolls. When men are designed as the height of physical fitness, women are portrayed with unrealistic breasts, hips, rears and other sexual features. These things have nothing to do with the roles they play in the game.Grampy_bone said:If an idealized male character is strong, powerful, and dominant; an idealized female character will be physically attractive. And the thing is: women don't mind this as much as you think.
Ummmm... Bullshit. Have you ever played Metroid 2? If you replaced Samus with a male character, the story would make less sense. The Metroid series is full of strong womens' stories.Grampy_bone said:Samus Aran is not a role model for anyone...
No. "Act like a man" doesn't mean 'good role model.' That mistake is often made, and I can see why. I don't think you understand. 'Girly' and 'submissive sexual poses on the battlefield' are two completely different things.Grampy_bone said:Invariably "good role model" for women means "act like a man." If a woman in a game acts the least bit girly...whoops! She's objectifying women now! She's an offensive steroetype! Blah blah blah. And all these complaints come from men. Women really just don't care.
Then you haven't met many female gamers. I can name distinctly fewer female gamers that maximize sexual traits in their characters, than ones that don't.Grampy_bone said:I have never met a female gamer who, in a game with a character creator like an MMO or Rock Band, did not create the sexiest character possible.
hunteriv4 said:I'm sure there are womyn out there who would be offended by me looking at them. I'm not going to lose sleep over it and I certainly don't want my video games tailored to that audience (who are probably doing more important things, like trying to respell "women" because "men" is in the word).
The difference between a real man and a tool is that a real man doesn't make a big fucking deal out of it, by say, writing self-glorifying articles on the internet in order to prove how progressive and enlightened they are.hunteriv4 said:Why can't it be both? Why do we have to assume that because a guy is chivalrous he's doing it just to get laid? Can't I respect women and still want to have sex?Grampy_bone said:Ha ha, I think this guy has it right. "Oh look at me, I am so concerned for the plight of women, I empathize with them and respect them! Now, want to go back to my place?" Invariably it seems that men who try to advocate female empowerment are just tools trying to get laid.
Objectification is when you don't have any interest in someone as a person other than sexually. But being sexually attracted to someone you respect simply means you have working hormones. Respect and attraction are hardly mutually exclusive.
Or should I assume the next time my girlfriend cooks dinner for me it's not because she genuinely likes me as a person but because she wants in my pants? See how silly that sounds?
There's a difference between being a realist and a cynic. The latter is going to be perpetually offended anyway so screw 'em =).
So, does that mean I am a douchebag too, since I said that I feel sorry that women get bothered online (Post #19) and can't just enjoy the game they're playing?Divine Miss Bee said:YES!!!! guys, pay attention: "white knights" are just as creepy, twice as annoying, and at least four times as chauvinistic as the obvious low-life weirdos, if not worse. chivalry is DEAD, and we want it that way, because all is does is keep us in a box. when i'm accosted by a "white knight" online, i do the sensible thing and hit him, because that's how i'd treat a rapist in real life, and there is NO difference. "no difference? that's beyond harsh, and not even true! you stupid lesbian feminazi! go die in a hole!"Demented Teddy said:AND ANOTHER THING:
The other type of males that try to protect us from the pervs and assholes, I get the vibe that they are doing it just because I am a girl.
"White Knights" piss me off too....not as much as the other types but still.
but it is. both "white knights" and rapists use political ideas about a man's natural superiority to keep women from becoming strong enough to stand on their own. rapists do it in person, "white knights" do it online, but the mindset is the same-"women are less powerful than me." it makes me sick.
Blow a fuse much? Miss the point much?hunteriv4 said:So should I be offended if a womyn says that I should enjoy my "boy's night out?" Or if I want to hang with the dudes? Or if my girlfriend calls me "baby?" (I'm fairly certain that's literally an infantilization)Rosicrucian said:What about calling women "girls"? I'm sure there's at least a few females offended by that infantilization.
I'm sure there are womyn out there who would be offended by me looking at them. I'm not going to lose sleep over it and I certainly don't want my video games tailored to that audience (who are probably doing more important things, like trying to respell "women" because "men" is in the word).
exactlybodare said:Oh, and there should not be 'male' or 'female' gamers... just gamers.
So what would you say about somebody who's making a big deal out of an article that was posted by someone who, in your opinion, is making a big deal out of something?Grampy_bone said:The difference between a real man and a tool is that a real man doesn't make a big fucking deal out of it, by say, writing self-glorifying articles on the internet in order to prove how progressive and enlightened they are.
Honestly, it seems like you're the one that missed the point. The terms Men and Boys get interchanged just as much as Women and Girls. If you want to nit-pick someone for using the term Girls then the same should be said for any women that uses Boys.Rosicrucian said:Blow a fuse much? Miss the point much?