Love for Mccain

Recommended Videos

Mathew952

New member
Feb 14, 2008
180
0
0
ffxfriek post=18.75110.857581 said:
Where is the love for Mccain (Nothing like mandatory love)
as mediocre as he is he's still good and better then Obama
( OHHHH EVIL MAN WITH A FUNNY NAME! Beware!).
He is from Chicago. Chicago means corrupt.
(Yep, EVERY ONE FROM CHICAGO is corrupt evil bastards. And all those lazy druggie poor people on welfare takin mah muny!)
If you higher taxes you destroy jobs.( Oh that's why companies like Exxon mobile aren't expanding. They only make 12 billion a year, no money for new jobs there)
If you put a tax on people with income of 250k+ a year then no one will want to work and you can't expand the company. (You don't just decide to not work. People have things like bills. And families.And food. All of which require them to work and make money. If anything, they'd have to work harder to make that money back)
Plus poverty will continue to rise because no one wants to work because the government will take their money.(That is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard. How is raising taxes on the top 5% by 4 to 5% going to grind the american economy to a halt? Especially when 95% of middle class families would get a cut) There's no such thing as free healthcare because the tax payers pay for it. ( That's not even an opinion, it's just a statement. No Candidate has said they'd give out free healthcare)
On my final note about how bad Obama is he is pro-choice. ( Oh No! He has a different opinion than you! that's how bad he is? Gee, I wonder why the masses don't rally around you and your space-brain)

Now McCain on the other hand is pro-life.( Really? The opposing candidates have different veiws?)
You can't start a war to end when it gets expensive. (What are you trying to say? oh, and fuck those people who are dying in the war, it's that spending we need to worry about!) Yes the war should've ended a many years ago but no one wanted to get their hands dirty. Lowering taxes creates jobs and you have more money to expand the company.
( Do you have ADD? Wrong paragraph, and no, because if that were the case, how come these giant companies that make billions a year aren't making jobs?) People are always complaining no woman is in the government. Well now Palin is the vice-president candidate and she is a woman and not exposed to corruption. She is pro-life and a good pick overall. (She presided over one of the biggest pork barrel bills ever, supports the succesionist party, spends 150,000 in two months on clothing, left her town 20 millions dollars in debt, and is borderline retarded) Sure I was hoping for maybe Romney or Huckabee but what the heck I like Palin just as well.

I'm curious why would you vote for who. Please no he's better then the other really get into the issues on why. They have completely opposing ideas. Oh, but they aren't better than the other. So make sure you vote based on total non issues and character questions! I searched for a thread like this but found none so sorry if its a repeat.

as for me I'm for McCain. His views on energy are good. Drill offshore. I also like how the government would buy bad mortgages and work out a payment plan for people to easily pay them. So your for small government, but you have no problem letting the government buy houses at full price, and refinancing them for less than that?
 

axia777

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,895
0
0
ffxfriek post=18.75110.859829 said:
Lets ask Joe the Plumber how Obama would help....er destroy his soon business if Obama is elected.....
That is the joke. There is no "Joe the Plumber". He has no Plumbers license. He makes enough money that he will be fine. Stop over reacting. As we have stated before all Obama wants to do is roll back the Bush tax cuts that he enacted after Clinton left office . That would put people who make more than $250K a year at a pre-2001 tax bracket. Just to let you know, the time Clinton was in office was the best economic boom America has had for decades. Being at a higher tax bracket certainly did not hamper people from making lots of cash.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2008/articles/2008/10/16/ohio_plumber_becomes_focus_of_debate/
 

Simalacrum

Resident Juggler
Apr 17, 2008
5,204
0
0
seriously, it isn't the question about oil anymore; it will run out very soon, this fact is as inevitable as the fucking tide (using mr Yahtzee's words :p)
we should be concentrating on other, more long term environmentally friendly options, like electricity, hydrogen, etc (NOT bio fuels btw thats still environmentally hazardous and raises food prices)
short term solutions like more drillig simply prolong the problem, as well as causing more
 

smallharmlesskitten

Not David Bowie
Apr 3, 2008
2,645
0
0
Sethran post=18.75110.859819 said:
>_>

The only thing I have to say is--

People that do more work already pay more taxes, it's a simple fact. Taxing is done via percentage, so if you make 100 dollars and get taxed 50 percent, you're paying 50 dollars in taxes. If you make 1000 dollars and get taxed 50 percent you're paying 500 dollars in taxes.

The problem with Obama's plan is he wants to double taxes for people over 250k a year. Trust me folks, 250k a year isn't a whole lot -- That's right in the middle of middle class -- and those people can't afford double the taxes. My family in particular will go bankrupt if that plan is approved and then we'll be living on wellfare, all because the people in the lower class don't want to work as hard as the people in the middle class.

I like Obama as a person, but his plans are far too idyllic to be usable. By the time he settled the national debt, millions of families would be bankrupt.
Are you smoking some serious weed....

250k is more than enough to pay a mortgage... gas, food and bills... Things cost more here.. My parents earn 125K combined. That is more than enough for us and we don't budget or anything.... Seriously dude 250k is a lot
 

Mathew952

New member
Feb 14, 2008
180
0
0
smallharmlesskitten post=18.75110.860222 said:
Sethran post=18.75110.859819 said:
>_>

The only thing I have to say is--

People that do more work already pay more taxes, it's a simple fact. Taxing is done via percentage, so if you make 100 dollars and get taxed 50 percent, you're paying 50 dollars in taxes. If you make 1000 dollars and get taxed 50 percent you're paying 500 dollars in taxes.

The problem with Obama's plan is he wants to double taxes for people over 250k a year. Trust me folks, 250k a year isn't a whole lot -- That's right in the middle of middle class -- and those people can't afford double the taxes. My family in particular will go bankrupt if that plan is approved and then we'll be living on wellfare, all because the people in the lower class don't want to work as hard as the people in the middle class.

I like Obama as a person, but his plans are far too idyllic to be usable. By the time he settled the national debt, millions of families would be bankrupt.
Are you smoking some serious weed....

250k is more than enough to pay a mortgage... gas, food and bills... Things cost more here.. My parents earn 125K combined. That is more than enough for us and we don't budget or anything.... Seriously dude 250k is a lot
Sorry,But people making 250,000 a year are NOT middle class. And how is raising their taxes by FIVE PERCENT doubling them? It would be an extra 12,500 dollars annually.
 

smallharmlesskitten

Not David Bowie
Apr 3, 2008
2,645
0
0
Just a bit of Palin/McCain facts..

*250K spent on her clothes
*80K spent on her make up artist
S*he has been called a Diva who refuses to listen to her advisors and has no relationship of trust with anyone.... THIS IS BY HER OWN ADVISORS.. They also say she is lining herself up for presidency
*Troopergate....need I say more

All of the above was in my National Newspaper...

She's a psycho christian who will probably try to prevent any research on evolution and related scientists (this is a 'positive statement', which means that it is my opinion and cannot be proven wrong. There is no facts involved)

into McCain.

*Fielding calls to give up presidency and concentrate on senate seats.
*Can't even handle the girls on the View.. constantly flip-flopping while talking to them (souricng video now)
*practically encourages racism against Obama
*Highyl likely he will die in office.. The man is in his 70's for crying out loud. Do you want that crazy palin in office

The only good thing to come out of this election is that 'Nailin Palin' video.. or so I have been told
 

axia777

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,895
0
0
smallharmlesskitten post=18.75110.860244 said:
Just a bit of Palin facts..They also say she is lining herself up for presidency
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, ever, not in a million years. As soon as she is able to run Hillary would come and kick her ass up and down the block. Hillary would eat her alive.
 

smallharmlesskitten

Not David Bowie
Apr 3, 2008
2,645
0
0
axia777 post=18.75110.860260 said:
smallharmlesskitten post=18.75110.860244 said:
Just a bit of Palin facts..They also say she is lining herself up for presidency
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No, ever, not in a million years. As soon as she is able to run Hillary would come and kick her ass up and down the block. Hillary would eat her alive.
True...and you broke the text box..
 

PedroSteckecilo

Mexican Fugitive
Feb 7, 2008
6,732
0
0
ffxfriek post=18.75110.857581 said:
If you put a tax on people with income of 250k+ a year then no one will want to work and you can't expand the company. Plus poverty will continue to rise because no one wants to work because the government will take their money. There's no such thing as free healthcare because the tax payers pay for it.
Um...

Canada has a scaled tax system whereby the more money you make the greater % of taxes you pay. Its kind of unfair but at the same time it kind of works. It hasn't killed our economy yet so I don't know why it would kill yours.
 

ffxfriek

New member
Apr 3, 2008
2,070
0
0
PedroSteckecilo post=18.75110.860341 said:
ffxfriek post=18.75110.857581 said:
If you put a tax on people with income of 250k+ a year then no one will want to work and you can't expand the company. Plus poverty will continue to rise because no one wants to work because the government will take their money. There's no such thing as free healthcare because the tax payers pay for it.
Um...

Canada has a scaled tax system whereby the more money you make the greater % of taxes you pay. Its kind of unfair but at the same time it kind of works. It hasn't killed our economy yet so I don't know why it would kill yours.
aagh your keyword here is: YET
 

Alex_P

All I really do is threadcrap
Mar 27, 2008
2,712
0
0
Sethran post=18.75110.859819 said:
The problem with Obama's plan is he wants to double taxes for people over 250k a year. Trust me folks, 250k a year isn't a whole lot -- That's right in the middle of middle class -- and those people can't afford double the taxes.
Umm, no. Hell no.

Median income for an American family is a lot closer to $50k/yr. than $250k/yr.

I live in one of the highest-income counties of the US, an area stuffed with well-educated workers and random millionaires, and median household income is around $90k-100k/yr.

In many areas of America, $250k will buy you a nice house -- no mortgage, just instant house.

Also, Obama's definitely not doubling income taxes -- how did you come up with that number? Now, the wealthy are also affected by other taxes, such as inheritance tax or capital gains tax, and I expect both of those to rise, but those are also taxes on money that, by definition, isn't the direct result of labor.

-- Alex
 

OuroborosChoked

New member
Aug 20, 2008
558
0
0
ffxfriek post=18.75110.857581 said:
Where is the love for Mccain as mediocre as he is he's still good and better then Obama. He is from Chicago. Chicago means corrupt. If you higher taxes you destroy jobs. If you put a tax on people with income of 250k+ a year then no one will want to work and you can't expand the company. Plus poverty will continue to rise because no one wants to work because the government will take their money. There's no such thing as free healthcare because the tax payers pay for it. On my final note about how bad Obama is he is pro-choice.

Now McCain on the other hand is pro-life. You can't start a war to end when it gets expensive. Yes the war should've ended a many years ago but no one wanted to get their hands dirty. Lowering taxes creates jobs and you have more money to expand the company. People are always complaining no woman is in the government. Well now Palin is the vice-president candidate and she is a woman and not exposed to corruption. She is pro-life and a good pick overall. Sure I was hoping for maybe Romney or Huckabee but what the heck I like Palin just as well.

I'm curious why would you vote for who. Please no he's better then the other really get into the issues on why. I searched for a thread like this but found none so sorry if its a repeat.

as for me I'm for McCain. His views on energy are good. Drill offshore. I also like how the government would buy bad mortgages and work out a payment plan for people to easily pay them.
Just a question: how can you be both pro-life and pro-war and NOT be a complete hypocrite?

Also, I'm glad you're not old enough to vote yet. Hell, you barely have a grasp on English...
 

ffxfriek

New member
Apr 3, 2008
2,070
0
0
OuroborosChoked post=18.75110.860396 said:
ffxfriek post=18.75110.857581 said:
Where is the love for Mccain as mediocre as he is he's still good and better then Obama. He is from Chicago. Chicago means corrupt. If you higher taxes you destroy jobs. If you put a tax on people with income of 250k+ a year then no one will want to work and you can't expand the company. Plus poverty will continue to rise because no one wants to work because the government will take their money. There's no such thing as free healthcare because the tax payers pay for it. On my final note about how bad Obama is he is pro-choice.

Now McCain on the other hand is pro-life. You can't start a war to end when it gets expensive. Yes the war should've ended a many years ago but no one wanted to get their hands dirty. Lowering taxes creates jobs and you have more money to expand the company. People are always complaining no woman is in the government. Well now Palin is the vice-president candidate and she is a woman and not exposed to corruption. She is pro-life and a good pick overall. Sure I was hoping for maybe Romney or Huckabee but what the heck I like Palin just as well.

I'm curious why would you vote for who. Please no he's better then the other really get into the issues on why. I searched for a thread like this but found none so sorry if its a repeat.

as for me I'm for McCain. His views on energy are good. Drill offshore. I also like how the government would buy bad mortgages and work out a payment plan for people to easily pay them.
Just a question: how can you be both pro-life and pro-war and NOT be a complete hypocrite?

Also, I'm glad you're not old enough to vote yet. Hell, you barely have a grasp on English...

pro-war???? noone is pro war.....we need to finish what we started or we look week and when it gets tough and expensive we back down and quit.....the very definition of america is quitters.....nope dont see it...and obama is pro war too by your definitions too....
 

OuroborosChoked

New member
Aug 20, 2008
558
0
0
ffxfriek post=18.75110.859989 said:
photog212 post=18.75110.859966 said:
Palin also said comments about invading Pakistan.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jxdRiHs0huSO2qb_uiwdR45pH2fAD93GNQT80
And blaming the media, I'm sorry but if she can't handle Katie Couric how can I trust her to handle Putin and Ahmadinajhad.
did ya read the article? it says attack terrorist hideouts...not an all out war with pakistan.......
Please explain to me how you can attack "terrorist hideouts" inside of a country you're NOT at war with WITHOUT invading said country? What, do you surreptitiously sidle up to the hideouts, quickly chuck a bomb in, and then whistle nonchalantly as you walk away... all while not entering that country in any way? You can't attack a sovereign nation without invasion or starting a war. It just isn't possible.
 

axia777

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,895
0
0
ffxfriek post=18.75110.860418 said:
pro-war???? noone is pro war.....we need to finish what we started or we look week and when it gets tough and expensive we back down and quit.....the very definition of america is quitters.....nope dont see it...and obama is pro war too by your definitions too....
I am sorry to say I am sure that we are debating with a 12-14 year old that is just regurgitating what his father says at the dinner table. I respectfully decline to debate with him anymore. Have a good day ffxFriek. Come debate with me when you are of an age you can vote.