Poll: Chicken or the Egg?

Recommended Videos

TotallyFake

New member
Jun 14, 2009
401
0
0
Omikron009 said:
Egg. Chicken had to have hatched out of an egg.
But that won't have been a chicken egg, it'll have been the egg of whatever the chicken evolved from. As the egg comes from the mother and won't have the same DNA as the chicken within it, the Chicken must have come before chicken eggs.
 

savandicus

New member
Jun 5, 2008
664
0
0
The answer is obviously a chicken and here is a simple reason why

We have a non chicken creature that lays an egg that hatches the first creature close enough to a chicken to count as a chicken, the egg from which it hatched was not a chicken's egg it was an egg of the non chicken creature that layed it. Therefore the chicken came first because the egg from which it hatched is excluded for not being a chicken's egg.

But, i here you say, we did not put any restrictions on the egg having to be a chicken's egg but then you have made your original statement non-sensical since if you dont restrict the egg to that of a chicken's then ofcourse the egg came first by millions of years, only a fool would believe that chickens were the first creatures to lay eggs.

And thus you come to the logical conclusion that the correct answer is niether until the person who poses the question adds more limits on the question to ensure that there is only one answer.
 

omega 616

Elite Member
May 1, 2009
5,883
1
43
manaman said:
Icecoldcynic said:
If we're talking about any kind of egg generally, then the egg came first, but no other animal other than a chicken would lay a chicken egg.
Actually it would. Evolution is the reason the egg came first.
I only just woke up so I am a little groggy but if a single cell evolved, I imagine, it would be like a frog cell, it goes from a single cell to a tadpole then grows legs.

I can't see a single cell growing into an egg first, wouldn't it evolve into the creature first, in this case a chick, then grow into a chicken which lays an egg, starting the cycle.

It just seems more likely than it starting from the very start with a shell, then breaking out of it.
 

Wyes

New member
Aug 1, 2009
514
0
0
savandicus said:
The answer is obviously a chicken and here is a simple reason why

We have a non chicken creature that lays an egg that hatches the first creature close enough to a chicken to count as a chicken, the egg from which it hatched was not a chicken's egg it was an egg of the non chicken creature that layed it. Therefore the chicken came first because the egg from which it hatched is excluded for not being a chicken's egg.

But, i here you say, we did not put any restrictions on the egg having to be a chicken's egg but then you have made your original statement non-sensical since if you dont restrict the egg to that of a chicken's then ofcourse the egg came first by millions of years, only a fool would believe that chickens were the first creatures to lay eggs.

And thus you come to the logical conclusion that the correct answer is niether until the person who poses the question adds more limits on the question to ensure that there is only one answer.
While logically, yes, it wasn't a 'chicken egg' so to speak, the genes of/contained in the egg are that of the chicken, thus I'm going to dub it a 'chicken egg', and declare that the egg came first.

You're right though, the question does indeed need more limits.
 

dietpeachsnapple

New member
May 27, 2009
1,273
0
0
This did NOT need to be rooted in the creationism vs evolution debate.

Both could go either way given the lines of logic provided.
 

Kud

I'm stuck because demonic spider
Sep 29, 2009
3,713
0
0
Batman came before both of them, because he is just that awesome.
 

wilted_orchid

New member
Aug 11, 2009
279
0
0
You can't presume that the "I don't know" belongs to Athiests and Agnostics - that's terribly narrow minded. I'm a Christian and I responded 'I don't know', but I still believe God started it all, I just don't know how or with which because I wasn't there. Regardless, I have faith which tells me He was there and still is. I'm not having a go or a bash here, by the way, I'm just airing my views ^_^
 

reg42

New member
Mar 18, 2009
5,390
0
0
Samcanuck said:
Let's just say 'I don't know' goes to Agnostics and Athiests.
Um... What? Most atheists I've met believe in evolution, such as myself

I believe that some chicken-like-thing was on earth and after millions of years it slowly evolved into the chicken we know today. It's quite impossible to determine which was first, unless you know the specific point in time it became the chicken we know today.
 

-Orgasmatron-

New member
Nov 3, 2008
1,321
0
0
Samcanuck said:
Egg comes first.....That egg is the first evolved chicken. When this hatches, the first chicken will have entered the world. (or the first chicken zygote if you must)
This.

It's pretty simple, I don't know how people can't work it out.
 

BlackHat

New member
Jan 30, 2009
80
0
0
The chicken and the egg are lying in bed together, the chicken looks pleased with himself smoking a cigarette. THe egg on the other hand looks fustraited and a little out of breath.

"well i think we answered THAT question" said the egg

chicken came first
 

lukcos

New member
Apr 26, 2009
5
0
0
Quote Doomsday arcade:

Well if we believe Darwin's Evolution theory then something that evolved into the chicken would have laid the egg so...the Egg
 

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
Dinosaurs were born out of eggs long before there were even chicken.

/thread
 

Wyes

New member
Aug 1, 2009
514
0
0
Ekonk said:
Dinosaurs were born out of eggs long before there were even chicken.

/thread
You can really tell when people have read the thread. :D
 

Nannernade

New member
May 18, 2009
1,233
0
0
The egg comes first for one reason, nobody has stated that the egg is a chicken egg but due to evolution something laid the eggs that evolved into a chicken over time so yes the egg came first. =P
 

Rawker

New member
Jun 24, 2009
1,115
0
0
Chicken. What's there to incubate the egg. And the bible already answered this one.