Pernese post=18.75011.853899 said:
As for myself, I trust my government to do its best to deal with the problems presented to it. I understand the necessity of state secrets, just as I am grateful for the Freedom of Information Act. Deriding the government as either evil or praising it as saintly places you in a polarized ideology camp. Take the government as what it is, a collection of fallible people, and try to better it.
While I like your last point, a lot, I think that degree of trust in this or any government is dangerous. And the precedent set by the Patriot Act is extremely far-reaching. It is never good enough to rationalize the use of exceptional powers because those who are entrusted with them promise not to abuse them. It is synonymous with the saying, "if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear." But can you guarantee that the Patriot Act won't be used against innocents? Of course, you cannot. History shows that exceptional powers, once granted, can and will be abused, or used against their original intent or purpose. It's only a matter of time. So what's to be done? Laws are enacted which restrict government actions, and individuals are guaranteed rights to protect them and prevent government abuse. Those are the guarantees. Individual freedoms and restrictions on government power are the guarantees that, in normal times, prevent the abuse of power.
Essentially, the Patriot Act is the dismantling of those very guarantees. All it is, is the suspension of that which is intended to prevent abuses of power. The precedent is too extreme, and the potential for corruption too dangerous. There is a reason we had those freedoms in the first place, and I would not have them suspended. Liberty is worthless if it is too lightly surrendered. This is why Benjamin Franklin said:
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both."